The essence of things. Is there a methodological specificity in sociological knowledge?
Scientific reasoning – presumed unique, perfect, objective – still solidly bases its foundations on the consequences of the evident success (theoretical and practical) obtained over the centuries starting from Galilean intuition. Over time, the granitic belief that scientific success can depend excl...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Science & Philosophy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/scienceandphilosophy/article/view/729 |
| Summary: | Scientific reasoning – presumed unique, perfect, objective – still solidly bases its foundations on the consequences of the evident success (theoretical and practical) obtained over the centuries starting from Galilean intuition. Over time, the granitic belief that scientific success can depend exclusively on a single, simple principle of method, has actually been slightly undermined; there is still a solid scientific basis about this idea, but the demands for rethinking and eclecticism also in the methodological approach begin to be "important". It therefore seems absolutely compelling to note the difference between "inanimate" sciences – which have gradually seen the level of compliexity growing, however, resulting from the fact that the more the system of knowledge grows and the greater are the dark areas to be revealed – and "animated" sciences who have as their object of interest people, sensibility, ethics, behaviors and social actions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2282-7757 2282-7765 |