Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism

A general consensus persists that sensory-perceptual differences in autism, such as hypersensitivities to light or sound, result from an overreliance on new (rather than prior) sensory observations. However, conflicting Bayesian accounts of autism remain unresolved as to whether such alterations are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Randeniya, I. Vilares, J. B. Mattingley, M. I. Garrido
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-12-01
Series:Computational Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cpsyjournal.org/articles/69
_version_ 1828420220362948608
author R. Randeniya
I. Vilares
J. B. Mattingley
M. I. Garrido
author_facet R. Randeniya
I. Vilares
J. B. Mattingley
M. I. Garrido
author_sort R. Randeniya
collection DOAJ
description A general consensus persists that sensory-perceptual differences in autism, such as hypersensitivities to light or sound, result from an overreliance on new (rather than prior) sensory observations. However, conflicting Bayesian accounts of autism remain unresolved as to whether such alterations are caused by more precise sensory observations (precise likelihood model) or by forming a less precise model of the sensory context (hypo-priors model). We used a decision-under-uncertainty paradigm that manipulated uncertainty in both likelihoods and priors. Contrary to model predictions we found no differences in reliance on likelihood in autistic group (AS) compared to neurotypicals (NT) and found no differences in subjective prior variance between groups. However, we found reduced context adjustment in the AS group compared to NT. Further, the AS group showed heightened variability in their relative weighting of sensory information (vs. prior) on a trial-by-trial basis. When participants were aligned on a continuum of autistic traits, we found no associations with likelihood reliance or prior variance but found an increase in likelihood precision with autistic traits. These findings together provide empirical evidence for intact priors, precise likelihood, reduced context updating and heightened variability during sensory learning in autism.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T15:08:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7c6f0bffdf44936900b424074cd5e76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2379-6227
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T15:08:11Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Computational Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-a7c6f0bffdf44936900b424074cd5e762022-12-22T01:44:00ZengUbiquity PressComputational Psychiatry2379-62272021-12-015110.5334/cpsy.6963Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in AutismR. Randeniya0I. Vilares1J. B. Mattingley2M. I. Garrido3Queensland Brain Institute, The University of QueenslandDepartment of Psychology, University of MinnesotaQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, AU; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), CA; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain FunctionMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain FunctionA general consensus persists that sensory-perceptual differences in autism, such as hypersensitivities to light or sound, result from an overreliance on new (rather than prior) sensory observations. However, conflicting Bayesian accounts of autism remain unresolved as to whether such alterations are caused by more precise sensory observations (precise likelihood model) or by forming a less precise model of the sensory context (hypo-priors model). We used a decision-under-uncertainty paradigm that manipulated uncertainty in both likelihoods and priors. Contrary to model predictions we found no differences in reliance on likelihood in autistic group (AS) compared to neurotypicals (NT) and found no differences in subjective prior variance between groups. However, we found reduced context adjustment in the AS group compared to NT. Further, the AS group showed heightened variability in their relative weighting of sensory information (vs. prior) on a trial-by-trial basis. When participants were aligned on a continuum of autistic traits, we found no associations with likelihood reliance or prior variance but found an increase in likelihood precision with autistic traits. These findings together provide empirical evidence for intact priors, precise likelihood, reduced context updating and heightened variability during sensory learning in autism.https://cpsyjournal.org/articles/69asdvisualsensitivitiesautism traitsbayesianinsistence on samenessrestrictive repetitive behavioursrrbpriorlikelihood
spellingShingle R. Randeniya
I. Vilares
J. B. Mattingley
M. I. Garrido
Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
Computational Psychiatry
asd
visual
sensitivities
autism traits
bayesian
insistence on sameness
restrictive repetitive behaviours
rrb
prior
likelihood
title Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
title_full Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
title_fullStr Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
title_full_unstemmed Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
title_short Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism
title_sort reduced context updating but intact visual priors in autism
topic asd
visual
sensitivities
autism traits
bayesian
insistence on sameness
restrictive repetitive behaviours
rrb
prior
likelihood
url https://cpsyjournal.org/articles/69
work_keys_str_mv AT rrandeniya reducedcontextupdatingbutintactvisualpriorsinautism
AT ivilares reducedcontextupdatingbutintactvisualpriorsinautism
AT jbmattingley reducedcontextupdatingbutintactvisualpriorsinautism
AT migarrido reducedcontextupdatingbutintactvisualpriorsinautism