Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial
Background: This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess and compare postoperative swelling and pain in patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation using RidgeMax Pro and AlveoGraft Plus. Methods: A total of 20 patients requiring tooth extraction were enrolled in this study and randomly assi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=443;epage=445;aulast=Kumar |
| _version_ | 1797222331356020736 |
|---|---|
| author | Mukesh Kumar Ram Prasad Sah Neha Kumari Rohan Kumar Monalisha Jha Rakhi Kumari |
| author_facet | Mukesh Kumar Ram Prasad Sah Neha Kumari Rohan Kumar Monalisha Jha Rakhi Kumari |
| author_sort | Mukesh Kumar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess and compare postoperative swelling and pain in patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation using RidgeMax Pro and AlveoGraft Plus. Methods: A total of 20 patients requiring tooth extraction were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received alveolar ridge preservation with RidgeMax Pro and Group B with AlveoGraft Plus. Postoperative swelling was evaluated by measuring facial dimensions using standardized facial photographs at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at the same time points. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Both RidgeMax Pro and AlveoGraft Plus demonstrated effective alveolar ridge preservation without any reported complications. In terms of postoperative swelling, Group A (RidgeMax Pro) exhibited significantly lower facial swelling compared to Group B (AlveoGraft Plus) at all time points (P < 0.05). The mean pain scores on the VAS were consistently lower in Group A than in Group B across the assessment time points (P < 0.05). The trend of reduced swelling and pain in Group A persisted throughout the 72-hour follow-up period. Conclusion: Alveolar ridge preservation with RidgeMax Pro (Trade Name: RidgeMax Pro) resulted in significantly reduced postoperative swelling and pain compared to AlveoGraft Plus (Trade Name: AlveoGraft Plus). |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:19:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a7db1168da914a0a9c18f8e87ef05b0d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:19:38Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-a7db1168da914a0a9c18f8e87ef05b0d2024-04-04T16:37:39ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116544344510.4103/jpbs.jpbs_699_23Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trialMukesh KumarRam Prasad SahNeha KumariRohan KumarMonalisha JhaRakhi KumariBackground: This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess and compare postoperative swelling and pain in patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation using RidgeMax Pro and AlveoGraft Plus. Methods: A total of 20 patients requiring tooth extraction were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received alveolar ridge preservation with RidgeMax Pro and Group B with AlveoGraft Plus. Postoperative swelling was evaluated by measuring facial dimensions using standardized facial photographs at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at the same time points. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Both RidgeMax Pro and AlveoGraft Plus demonstrated effective alveolar ridge preservation without any reported complications. In terms of postoperative swelling, Group A (RidgeMax Pro) exhibited significantly lower facial swelling compared to Group B (AlveoGraft Plus) at all time points (P < 0.05). The mean pain scores on the VAS were consistently lower in Group A than in Group B across the assessment time points (P < 0.05). The trend of reduced swelling and pain in Group A persisted throughout the 72-hour follow-up period. Conclusion: Alveolar ridge preservation with RidgeMax Pro (Trade Name: RidgeMax Pro) resulted in significantly reduced postoperative swelling and pain compared to AlveoGraft Plus (Trade Name: AlveoGraft Plus).http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=443;epage=445;aulast=Kumaralveolar ridge preservationbiomaterialspainpostoperative swelling |
| spellingShingle | Mukesh Kumar Ram Prasad Sah Neha Kumari Rohan Kumar Monalisha Jha Rakhi Kumari Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences alveolar ridge preservation biomaterials pain postoperative swelling |
| title | Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_full | Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_short | Assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials: A randomized controlled trial |
| title_sort | assessment of postoperative swelling and pain following alveolar ridge preservation with different biomaterials a randomized controlled trial |
| topic | alveolar ridge preservation biomaterials pain postoperative swelling |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=443;epage=445;aulast=Kumar |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mukeshkumar assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ramprasadsah assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nehakumari assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rohankumar assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT monalishajha assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rakhikumari assessmentofpostoperativeswellingandpainfollowingalveolarridgepreservationwithdifferentbiomaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |