Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study

Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sargam Miglani, Shruti Chandak, Yogender, Ankur Malhotra, Arjit Agarwal, Jigar Haria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18391/65460_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_QC(KK_RV_RDW_SS)_PF1(AG_OM)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1797671754212048896
author Sargam Miglani
Shruti Chandak
Yogender
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Jigar Haria
author_facet Sargam Miglani
Shruti Chandak
Yogender
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Jigar Haria
author_sort Sargam Miglani
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious on conventional MRI. Aim: To determine DTI parameters, specifically Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), in patients with meningitis and compare them with controls. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted over a period of 18 months at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study included a total of 61 clinically diagnosed meningitis patients, aged 18 years and above, who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for an MRI Brain. Additionally, 61 controls were included. Conventional MRI images were obtained followed by DTI. FA and ADC values were calculated by placing Regions Of Interest (ROI) at different levels for both groups. DTI parameters for different causative organisms (bacterial, viral, tubercular, and fungal) were compared. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to identify significant differences. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: FA values were significantly lower in cases compared to controls at all levels in the brain (mean whole brain FA value of 0.30±0.036 in cases vs 0.43±0.030 in controls). ADC values were significantly higher in cases at the cerebellum, brainstem, and whole brain levels compared to controls (mean whole brain ADC value of 0.812±0.095 in cases vs 0.758±0.026 in controls) (p-value<0.05 considered statistically significant). These differences were evident in patients with clinically proven meningitis who had a normal appearance on conventional MRI, demonstrating the superiority of DTI over conventional MRI for the diagnosis of meningitis. Statistically significant differences were also found among different aetiological agents, highlighting the potential utility of DTI in the differential diagnosis of meningitis cases (mean whole brain FA of 0.31±0.038 in bacterial cases, 0.029±0.037 in viral cases, 0.299±0.034 in tubercular cases, and 0.27±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.43±0.030 in controls (p-value <0.01) and mean whole brain ADC values of 0.80±0.051 in bacterial, 0.85±0.14 in viral, 0.79±0.058 in tubercular, 1.03±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.758±0.026 in controls (p-value <0.01)). Conclusion: DTI is more sensitive than conventional MRI and is a useful early indicator of inflammatory process in patients with meningitis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:20:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7e60267b2d9456d962664866565079f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:20:08Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-a7e60267b2d9456d962664866565079f2023-09-28T09:26:12ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-09-011709010510.7860/JCDR/2023/65460.18391Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control StudySargam Miglani0Shruti Chandak1Yogender2Ankur Malhotra3Arjit Agarwal4Jigar Haria5PG Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiodiagnosis, A to Z Diagnostics, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious on conventional MRI. Aim: To determine DTI parameters, specifically Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), in patients with meningitis and compare them with controls. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted over a period of 18 months at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study included a total of 61 clinically diagnosed meningitis patients, aged 18 years and above, who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for an MRI Brain. Additionally, 61 controls were included. Conventional MRI images were obtained followed by DTI. FA and ADC values were calculated by placing Regions Of Interest (ROI) at different levels for both groups. DTI parameters for different causative organisms (bacterial, viral, tubercular, and fungal) were compared. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to identify significant differences. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: FA values were significantly lower in cases compared to controls at all levels in the brain (mean whole brain FA value of 0.30±0.036 in cases vs 0.43±0.030 in controls). ADC values were significantly higher in cases at the cerebellum, brainstem, and whole brain levels compared to controls (mean whole brain ADC value of 0.812±0.095 in cases vs 0.758±0.026 in controls) (p-value<0.05 considered statistically significant). These differences were evident in patients with clinically proven meningitis who had a normal appearance on conventional MRI, demonstrating the superiority of DTI over conventional MRI for the diagnosis of meningitis. Statistically significant differences were also found among different aetiological agents, highlighting the potential utility of DTI in the differential diagnosis of meningitis cases (mean whole brain FA of 0.31±0.038 in bacterial cases, 0.029±0.037 in viral cases, 0.299±0.034 in tubercular cases, and 0.27±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.43±0.030 in controls (p-value <0.01) and mean whole brain ADC values of 0.80±0.051 in bacterial, 0.85±0.14 in viral, 0.79±0.058 in tubercular, 1.03±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.758±0.026 in controls (p-value <0.01)). Conclusion: DTI is more sensitive than conventional MRI and is a useful early indicator of inflammatory process in patients with meningitis.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18391/65460_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_QC(KK_RV_RDW_SS)_PF1(AG_OM)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdfanisotropyapparent diffusion coefficientcentral nervous system infectionsmagnetic resonance imaging
spellingShingle Sargam Miglani
Shruti Chandak
Yogender
Ankur Malhotra
Arjit Agarwal
Jigar Haria
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
anisotropy
apparent diffusion coefficient
central nervous system infections
magnetic resonance imaging
title Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
title_full Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
title_fullStr Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
title_short Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
title_sort diffusion tensor imaging parameters in patients with meningitis a case control study
topic anisotropy
apparent diffusion coefficient
central nervous system infections
magnetic resonance imaging
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18391/65460_CE[Ra1]_F(KR)_QC(KK_RV_RDW_SS)_PF1(AG_OM)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sargammiglani diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy
AT shrutichandak diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy
AT yogender diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy
AT ankurmalhotra diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy
AT arjitagarwal diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy
AT jigarharia diffusiontensorimagingparametersinpatientswithmeningitisacasecontrolstudy