Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat

Common bunt (caused by <i>Tilletia caries</i> and <i>T. Foetida</i>) is a major wheat disease. It occurs frequently in the USA and Turkey and damages grain yield and quality. Seed treatment with fungicides is an effective method to control this disease. However, using fungici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amira M. I. Mourad, Alexey Morgounov, P. Stephen Baenziger, Samar M. Esmail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/1/2
_version_ 1797406591932170240
author Amira M. I. Mourad
Alexey Morgounov
P. Stephen Baenziger
Samar M. Esmail
author_facet Amira M. I. Mourad
Alexey Morgounov
P. Stephen Baenziger
Samar M. Esmail
author_sort Amira M. I. Mourad
collection DOAJ
description Common bunt (caused by <i>Tilletia caries</i> and <i>T. Foetida</i>) is a major wheat disease. It occurs frequently in the USA and Turkey and damages grain yield and quality. Seed treatment with fungicides is an effective method to control this disease. However, using fungicides in organic and low-income fields is forbidden, and planting resistant cultivars are preferred. Due to the highly effective use of fungicides, little effort has been put into breeding resistant genotypes. In addition, the genetic diversity for this trait is low in modern wheat germplasm. Synthetic wheat genotypes were reported as an effective source to increase the diversity in wheat germplasm. Therefore, a set of 25 synthetics that are resistant to the Turkish common bunt race were evaluated against the Nebraska common bunt race. Four genotypes were found to be very resistant to Nebraska’s common bunt race. Using differential lines, four isolines carrying genes, <i>Bt10</i>, <i>Bt11</i>, <i>Bt12</i>, and <i>Btp</i>, were found to provide resistance against both Turkish and Nebraska common bunt races. Genotypes carrying any or all of these four genes could be used as a source of resistance in both countries. No correlation was found between common bunt resistance and some agronomic traits, which suggests that common bunt resistance is an independent trait.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:27:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7edd07ff7214ed9bbc8a3974ca32b39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:27:38Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-a7edd07ff7214ed9bbc8a3974ca32b392023-12-03T15:00:03ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-12-01121210.3390/plants12010002Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid WheatAmira M. I. Mourad0Alexey Morgounov1P. Stephen Baenziger2Samar M. Esmail3Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Gatersleben, GermanyInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.K. 39 Emek, 06511 Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, Plant Science Hall, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USAWheat Disease Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, EgyptCommon bunt (caused by <i>Tilletia caries</i> and <i>T. Foetida</i>) is a major wheat disease. It occurs frequently in the USA and Turkey and damages grain yield and quality. Seed treatment with fungicides is an effective method to control this disease. However, using fungicides in organic and low-income fields is forbidden, and planting resistant cultivars are preferred. Due to the highly effective use of fungicides, little effort has been put into breeding resistant genotypes. In addition, the genetic diversity for this trait is low in modern wheat germplasm. Synthetic wheat genotypes were reported as an effective source to increase the diversity in wheat germplasm. Therefore, a set of 25 synthetics that are resistant to the Turkish common bunt race were evaluated against the Nebraska common bunt race. Four genotypes were found to be very resistant to Nebraska’s common bunt race. Using differential lines, four isolines carrying genes, <i>Bt10</i>, <i>Bt11</i>, <i>Bt12</i>, and <i>Btp</i>, were found to provide resistance against both Turkish and Nebraska common bunt races. Genotypes carrying any or all of these four genes could be used as a source of resistance in both countries. No correlation was found between common bunt resistance and some agronomic traits, which suggests that common bunt resistance is an independent trait.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/1/2<i>Tilletia caries</i><i>T. Foetida</i>correlationdifferential linesseedling vigor
spellingShingle Amira M. I. Mourad
Alexey Morgounov
P. Stephen Baenziger
Samar M. Esmail
Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
Plants
<i>Tilletia caries</i>
<i>T. Foetida</i>
correlation
differential lines
seedling vigor
title Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
title_full Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
title_fullStr Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
title_short Genetic Variation in Common Bunt Resistance in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
title_sort genetic variation in common bunt resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat
topic <i>Tilletia caries</i>
<i>T. Foetida</i>
correlation
differential lines
seedling vigor
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT amiramimourad geneticvariationincommonbuntresistanceinsynthetichexaploidwheat
AT alexeymorgounov geneticvariationincommonbuntresistanceinsynthetichexaploidwheat
AT pstephenbaenziger geneticvariationincommonbuntresistanceinsynthetichexaploidwheat
AT samarmesmail geneticvariationincommonbuntresistanceinsynthetichexaploidwheat