Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls

This research study investigated the transient behavior of the convection–diffusion model for the infiltration heat recovery (IHR) and the influence of the building envelope heat capacity, along with other factors. A transient numerical model was developed and validated to analyze the IHR under vari...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alaa Alaidroos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7198
_version_ 1797573982710398976
author Alaa Alaidroos
author_facet Alaa Alaidroos
author_sort Alaa Alaidroos
collection DOAJ
description This research study investigated the transient behavior of the convection–diffusion model for the infiltration heat recovery (IHR) and the influence of the building envelope heat capacity, along with other factors. A transient numerical model was developed and validated to analyze the IHR under various conditions. The results highlight the role of heat capacity, thermal conductivity, wall thickness, airflow rate, airflow direction, and wall porosity on the temperature distribution and the heat recovery factor within the wall. Higher-heat-capacity walls displayed a delayed temperature rise, while low-thermal-conductivity walls reduced the conduction heat transfer and increased the IHR factor. The impact of heat capacity diminished with very low thermal conductivity walls but became evident for high-thermal-conductivity walls, particularly at higher Peclet numbers. Thicker walls enhanced the heat retention and improved the IHR, with a reduced influence of airflow rate. Higher IHR factors were associated with thicker walls, lower Peclet numbers, and higher heat capacities. The analysis also showed that the wall porosity affected the IHR with less significance than the other factors. Incorporating these findings into building energy modeling tools could improve the prediction accuracy of the thermal behavior of buildings. Accordingly, this study contributes to building physics by understanding IHR dynamics and thermal mass interactions, as well as improving building energy modeling accuracy for performance prediction. Future research can explore the impacts of additional factors on IHR and investigate the effect of IHR on the overall energy consumption of buildings.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:16:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a81633a2f8324b4fb48329628f28dd0e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:16:51Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-a81633a2f8324b4fb48329628f28dd0e2023-11-19T16:23:34ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-10-011620719810.3390/en16207198Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building WallsAlaa Alaidroos0Architectural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering-Rabigh Branch, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi ArabiaThis research study investigated the transient behavior of the convection–diffusion model for the infiltration heat recovery (IHR) and the influence of the building envelope heat capacity, along with other factors. A transient numerical model was developed and validated to analyze the IHR under various conditions. The results highlight the role of heat capacity, thermal conductivity, wall thickness, airflow rate, airflow direction, and wall porosity on the temperature distribution and the heat recovery factor within the wall. Higher-heat-capacity walls displayed a delayed temperature rise, while low-thermal-conductivity walls reduced the conduction heat transfer and increased the IHR factor. The impact of heat capacity diminished with very low thermal conductivity walls but became evident for high-thermal-conductivity walls, particularly at higher Peclet numbers. Thicker walls enhanced the heat retention and improved the IHR, with a reduced influence of airflow rate. Higher IHR factors were associated with thicker walls, lower Peclet numbers, and higher heat capacities. The analysis also showed that the wall porosity affected the IHR with less significance than the other factors. Incorporating these findings into building energy modeling tools could improve the prediction accuracy of the thermal behavior of buildings. Accordingly, this study contributes to building physics by understanding IHR dynamics and thermal mass interactions, as well as improving building energy modeling accuracy for performance prediction. Future research can explore the impacts of additional factors on IHR and investigate the effect of IHR on the overall energy consumption of buildings.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7198infiltration heat recoverybuilding thermal masswall’s heat capacitynumerical modelingbreathing wall
spellingShingle Alaa Alaidroos
Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
Energies
infiltration heat recovery
building thermal mass
wall’s heat capacity
numerical modeling
breathing wall
title Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
title_full Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
title_fullStr Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
title_full_unstemmed Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
title_short Transient Behavior Analysis of the Infiltration Heat Recovery of Exterior Building Walls
title_sort transient behavior analysis of the infiltration heat recovery of exterior building walls
topic infiltration heat recovery
building thermal mass
wall’s heat capacity
numerical modeling
breathing wall
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/20/7198
work_keys_str_mv AT alaaalaidroos transientbehavioranalysisoftheinfiltrationheatrecoveryofexteriorbuildingwalls