Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana

To estimate the prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 12–15-year-old children in eighteen public junior high schools in the Bongo District of Ghana. External and intern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frederick A Asare, Priya Morjaria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Cogent Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2021.1911414
_version_ 1811227649797783552
author Frederick A Asare
Priya Morjaria
author_facet Frederick A Asare
Priya Morjaria
author_sort Frederick A Asare
collection DOAJ
description To estimate the prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 12–15-year-old children in eighteen public junior high schools in the Bongo District of Ghana. External and internal eye examinations were conducted while a non–cycloplegic refraction technique was used to determine refractive errors among the children. A total of 1,705 school children were recruited and examined for refractive errors. Their mean age ± SD was 14.1 ± 0.9 years. The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error was 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%—2.5%) with myopia (0.8%; 95% CI 0.5%—1.4%) being the most common, followed by astigmatism (0.6%; 95% CI 0.3%—1.1%) then hyperopia (0.4%; 95% CI 0.2%—0.8%). A multinomial logistic regression revealed that female students had about three times higher risk of having uncorrected refractive error as compared to males after adjusting for age which was statistically significant (ARR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.3; z = 2.3; P = .02). None of the children with refractive error had correction. Even though the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in this study is lower than that reported in different parts of the country, none of the children with an error had correction. There is, therefore, the need for other studies to be conducted to further explore the cause of this as well as the varying prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among children in the northern and southern parts of Ghana.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:45:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a816733693724cdc8fd6bbbb3f62d869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-205X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:45:39Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a816733693724cdc8fd6bbbb3f62d8692022-12-22T03:37:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Medicine2331-205X2021-01-018110.1080/2331205X.2021.19114141911414Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of GhanaFrederick A Asare0Priya Morjaria1London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineTo estimate the prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 12–15-year-old children in eighteen public junior high schools in the Bongo District of Ghana. External and internal eye examinations were conducted while a non–cycloplegic refraction technique was used to determine refractive errors among the children. A total of 1,705 school children were recruited and examined for refractive errors. Their mean age ± SD was 14.1 ± 0.9 years. The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error was 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%—2.5%) with myopia (0.8%; 95% CI 0.5%—1.4%) being the most common, followed by astigmatism (0.6%; 95% CI 0.3%—1.1%) then hyperopia (0.4%; 95% CI 0.2%—0.8%). A multinomial logistic regression revealed that female students had about three times higher risk of having uncorrected refractive error as compared to males after adjusting for age which was statistically significant (ARR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.3; z = 2.3; P = .02). None of the children with refractive error had correction. Even though the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in this study is lower than that reported in different parts of the country, none of the children with an error had correction. There is, therefore, the need for other studies to be conducted to further explore the cause of this as well as the varying prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among children in the northern and southern parts of Ghana.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2021.1911414ghanauncorrected refractive errorschooleye health; prevalencebongo district
spellingShingle Frederick A Asare
Priya Morjaria
Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
Cogent Medicine
ghana
uncorrected refractive error
school
eye health; prevalence
bongo district
title Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
title_full Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
title_fullStr Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
title_short Prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the Bongo District of Ghana
title_sort prevalence and distribution of uncorrected refractive error among school children in the bongo district of ghana
topic ghana
uncorrected refractive error
school
eye health; prevalence
bongo district
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2021.1911414
work_keys_str_mv AT frederickaasare prevalenceanddistributionofuncorrectedrefractiveerroramongschoolchildreninthebongodistrictofghana
AT priyamorjaria prevalenceanddistributionofuncorrectedrefractiveerroramongschoolchildreninthebongodistrictofghana