Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.

To evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient accept...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Rief, Sarah Feger, Peter Martus, Michael Laule, Marc Dewey, Eva Schönenberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render
_version_ 1818195291683160064
author Matthias Rief
Sarah Feger
Peter Martus
Michael Laule
Marc Dewey
Eva Schönenberger
author_facet Matthias Rief
Sarah Feger
Peter Martus
Michael Laule
Marc Dewey
Eva Schönenberger
author_sort Matthias Rief
collection DOAJ
description To evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.A total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS-320 study. In this group, an intraindividual comparison of patient acceptance of CTA, CTP, and CCA was performed.CTP was experienced to be significantly more painful than CTA (p<0.001) and was associated with a higher frequency of dyspnea (p<0.001). Comparison of CTA/CTP with CCA revealed no significant differences in terms of pain (p = 0.141) and comfort (p = 0.377). Concern before CTA/CTP and CCA and overall satisfaction were likewise not significantly different (p = 0.097 and p = 0.123, respectively). Nevertheless, about two thirds (n = 60, 68%) preferred CTA/CTP to CCA (p<0.001). Moreover, patients felt less helpless during CTA/CTP than during CCA (p = 0.026). Lack of invasiveness and absence of pain were the most frequently mentioned advantages of CTA/CTP over CCA in our patient population.CCA and combined CTA/CTP are equally well accepted by patients; however, more patients prefer CTA/CTP. CTP was associated with more intense pain than CTA and more frequently caused dyspnea than CTA alone.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00967876.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:15:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a818a9b3fce54c3eb823de89fb8cc7aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:15:51Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-a818a9b3fce54c3eb823de89fb8cc7aa2022-12-22T00:43:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013673710.1371/journal.pone.0136737Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.Matthias RiefSarah FegerPeter MartusMichael LauleMarc DeweyEva SchönenbergerTo evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.A total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS-320 study. In this group, an intraindividual comparison of patient acceptance of CTA, CTP, and CCA was performed.CTP was experienced to be significantly more painful than CTA (p<0.001) and was associated with a higher frequency of dyspnea (p<0.001). Comparison of CTA/CTP with CCA revealed no significant differences in terms of pain (p = 0.141) and comfort (p = 0.377). Concern before CTA/CTP and CCA and overall satisfaction were likewise not significantly different (p = 0.097 and p = 0.123, respectively). Nevertheless, about two thirds (n = 60, 68%) preferred CTA/CTP to CCA (p<0.001). Moreover, patients felt less helpless during CTA/CTP than during CCA (p = 0.026). Lack of invasiveness and absence of pain were the most frequently mentioned advantages of CTA/CTP over CCA in our patient population.CCA and combined CTA/CTP are equally well accepted by patients; however, more patients prefer CTA/CTP. CTP was associated with more intense pain than CTA and more frequently caused dyspnea than CTA alone.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00967876.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render
spellingShingle Matthias Rief
Sarah Feger
Peter Martus
Michael Laule
Marc Dewey
Eva Schönenberger
Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
PLoS ONE
title Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
title_full Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
title_fullStr Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
title_short Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
title_sort acceptance of combined coronary ct angiography and myocardial ct perfusion versus conventional coronary angiography in patients with coronary stents intraindividual comparison
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasrief acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison
AT sarahfeger acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison
AT petermartus acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison
AT michaellaule acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison
AT marcdewey acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison
AT evaschonenberger acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison