Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.
To evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient accept...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1818195291683160064 |
---|---|
author | Matthias Rief Sarah Feger Peter Martus Michael Laule Marc Dewey Eva Schönenberger |
author_facet | Matthias Rief Sarah Feger Peter Martus Michael Laule Marc Dewey Eva Schönenberger |
author_sort | Matthias Rief |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.A total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS-320 study. In this group, an intraindividual comparison of patient acceptance of CTA, CTP, and CCA was performed.CTP was experienced to be significantly more painful than CTA (p<0.001) and was associated with a higher frequency of dyspnea (p<0.001). Comparison of CTA/CTP with CCA revealed no significant differences in terms of pain (p = 0.141) and comfort (p = 0.377). Concern before CTA/CTP and CCA and overall satisfaction were likewise not significantly different (p = 0.097 and p = 0.123, respectively). Nevertheless, about two thirds (n = 60, 68%) preferred CTA/CTP to CCA (p<0.001). Moreover, patients felt less helpless during CTA/CTP than during CCA (p = 0.026). Lack of invasiveness and absence of pain were the most frequently mentioned advantages of CTA/CTP over CCA in our patient population.CCA and combined CTA/CTP are equally well accepted by patients; however, more patients prefer CTA/CTP. CTP was associated with more intense pain than CTA and more frequently caused dyspnea than CTA alone.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00967876. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T01:15:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a818a9b3fce54c3eb823de89fb8cc7aa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T01:15:51Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-a818a9b3fce54c3eb823de89fb8cc7aa2022-12-22T00:43:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013673710.1371/journal.pone.0136737Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.Matthias RiefSarah FegerPeter MartusMichael LauleMarc DeweyEva SchönenbergerTo evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).While combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.A total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS-320 study. In this group, an intraindividual comparison of patient acceptance of CTA, CTP, and CCA was performed.CTP was experienced to be significantly more painful than CTA (p<0.001) and was associated with a higher frequency of dyspnea (p<0.001). Comparison of CTA/CTP with CCA revealed no significant differences in terms of pain (p = 0.141) and comfort (p = 0.377). Concern before CTA/CTP and CCA and overall satisfaction were likewise not significantly different (p = 0.097 and p = 0.123, respectively). Nevertheless, about two thirds (n = 60, 68%) preferred CTA/CTP to CCA (p<0.001). Moreover, patients felt less helpless during CTA/CTP than during CCA (p = 0.026). Lack of invasiveness and absence of pain were the most frequently mentioned advantages of CTA/CTP over CCA in our patient population.CCA and combined CTA/CTP are equally well accepted by patients; however, more patients prefer CTA/CTP. CTP was associated with more intense pain than CTA and more frequently caused dyspnea than CTA alone.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00967876.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Matthias Rief Sarah Feger Peter Martus Michael Laule Marc Dewey Eva Schönenberger Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. PLoS ONE |
title | Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. |
title_full | Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. |
title_fullStr | Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. |
title_short | Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison. |
title_sort | acceptance of combined coronary ct angiography and myocardial ct perfusion versus conventional coronary angiography in patients with coronary stents intraindividual comparison |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556695?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthiasrief acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison AT sarahfeger acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison AT petermartus acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison AT michaellaule acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison AT marcdewey acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison AT evaschonenberger acceptanceofcombinedcoronaryctangiographyandmyocardialctperfusionversusconventionalcoronaryangiographyinpatientswithcoronarystentsintraindividualcomparison |