Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV

Background: Current diagnostic criteria of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) rely on neuropsychological assessments. The aim of this study was to evaluate if gray matter volumes (GMV) can distinguish people with HAND, neurocognitively unimpaired people with HIV (unimpaired PWH), and uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikki Schantell, Brittany K. Taylor, Brandon J. Lew, Jennifer L. O'Neill, Pamela E. May, Susan Swindells, Tony W. Wilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158221002199
_version_ 1818367842884517888
author Mikki Schantell
Brittany K. Taylor
Brandon J. Lew
Jennifer L. O'Neill
Pamela E. May
Susan Swindells
Tony W. Wilson
author_facet Mikki Schantell
Brittany K. Taylor
Brandon J. Lew
Jennifer L. O'Neill
Pamela E. May
Susan Swindells
Tony W. Wilson
author_sort Mikki Schantell
collection DOAJ
description Background: Current diagnostic criteria of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) rely on neuropsychological assessments. The aim of this study was to evaluate if gray matter volumes (GMV) can distinguish people with HAND, neurocognitively unimpaired people with HIV (unimpaired PWH), and uninfected controls using linear discriminant analyses. Methods: A total of 231 participants, including 110 PWH and 121 uninfected controls, completed a neuropsychological assessment and an MRI protocol. Among PWH, HAND (n = 48) and unimpaired PWH (n = 62) designations were determined using the widely accepted Frascati criteria. We then assessed the extent to which GMV, corrected for intracranial volume, could accurately distinguish the three groups using linear discriminant analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy were computed for each model using the classification results based on GMV compared to the neuropsychological assessment. Results: The best performing model was comprised of bilaterally combined GMV and was stratified by sex. Among males, sensitivity was 85.2% (95% CI: 66.3%–95.8%), specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 91.6%-99.4%), and the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83–0.99). Among females, sensitivity was 100.0% (95% CI: 83.9%–100.0%), specificity was 98.8% (95% CI: 93.4%-100.0%), and the AUC was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Conclusions: GMV accurately discriminated HAND from unimpaired PWH and controls. Measures of GMV may be highly sensitive to HAND, and revisions to the Frascati criteria should consider including GMV in conjunction with a neuropsychological assessment to diagnose HAND.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a81dc75139cc448bac5de605b89e29c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2213-1582
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:58:29Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage: Clinical
spelling doaj.art-a81dc75139cc448bac5de605b89e29c92022-12-21T23:28:27ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822021-01-0131102775Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIVMikki Schantell0Brittany K. Taylor1Brandon J. Lew2Jennifer L. O'Neill3Pamela E. May4Susan Swindells5Tony W. Wilson6Institute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, NE, USA; College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, NE, USAInstitute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, NE, USAInstitute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, NE, USA; College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, NE, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, UNMC, Omaha, NE, USADepartment of Neurological Sciences, UNMC, Omaha, NE, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, UNMC, Omaha, NE, USAInstitute for Human Neuroscience, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, NE, USA; College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, NE, USA; Corresponding author at: Institute for Human Neuroscience, 378 Bucher Cir, Boys Town, NE 68010, United States.Background: Current diagnostic criteria of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) rely on neuropsychological assessments. The aim of this study was to evaluate if gray matter volumes (GMV) can distinguish people with HAND, neurocognitively unimpaired people with HIV (unimpaired PWH), and uninfected controls using linear discriminant analyses. Methods: A total of 231 participants, including 110 PWH and 121 uninfected controls, completed a neuropsychological assessment and an MRI protocol. Among PWH, HAND (n = 48) and unimpaired PWH (n = 62) designations were determined using the widely accepted Frascati criteria. We then assessed the extent to which GMV, corrected for intracranial volume, could accurately distinguish the three groups using linear discriminant analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy were computed for each model using the classification results based on GMV compared to the neuropsychological assessment. Results: The best performing model was comprised of bilaterally combined GMV and was stratified by sex. Among males, sensitivity was 85.2% (95% CI: 66.3%–95.8%), specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 91.6%-99.4%), and the AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83–0.99). Among females, sensitivity was 100.0% (95% CI: 83.9%–100.0%), specificity was 98.8% (95% CI: 93.4%-100.0%), and the AUC was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Conclusions: GMV accurately discriminated HAND from unimpaired PWH and controls. Measures of GMV may be highly sensitive to HAND, and revisions to the Frascati criteria should consider including GMV in conjunction with a neuropsychological assessment to diagnose HAND.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158221002199neuroHIVHANDClassificationSex differencesStructural MRI
spellingShingle Mikki Schantell
Brittany K. Taylor
Brandon J. Lew
Jennifer L. O'Neill
Pamela E. May
Susan Swindells
Tony W. Wilson
Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
NeuroImage: Clinical
neuroHIV
HAND
Classification
Sex differences
Structural MRI
title Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
title_full Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
title_fullStr Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
title_full_unstemmed Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
title_short Gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with HIV
title_sort gray matter volumes discriminate cognitively impaired and unimpaired people with hiv
topic neuroHIV
HAND
Classification
Sex differences
Structural MRI
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158221002199
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkischantell graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT brittanyktaylor graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT brandonjlew graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT jenniferloneill graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT pamelaemay graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT susanswindells graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv
AT tonywwilson graymattervolumesdiscriminatecognitivelyimpairedandunimpairedpeoplewithhiv