Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems
Abstract Background An international comparison of health system performance is a popular tool of health policy analysis. However, the efficiency evaluation of health systems is a practical example of an international comparison in which non-homogeneity is expected. The objective of this paper is to...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10246-8 |
| _version_ | 1797630327641866240 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin Dlouhý |
| author_facet | Martin Dlouhý |
| author_sort | Martin Dlouhý |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background An international comparison of health system performance is a popular tool of health policy analysis. However, the efficiency evaluation of health systems is a practical example of an international comparison in which non-homogeneity is expected. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of health systems by models in which a degree of non-homogeneity among countries is considered. Methods We study the problem of non-homogeneity of health systems in the theoretical framework of the data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is a popular method of efficiency evaluation with hundreds of applications from various fields. DEA assume the homogeneity of production units and the homogeneity of the environment in which the production units operate. Hence, we compiled a summary of 14 recommendations on how to deal with the non-homogeneity in the DEA models. The analysed sample includes 38 OECD member countries. The data are from the year 2019. Results As an example, we evaluated the health system efficiency of the Czech Republic. We used the DEA models with the neighbourhood measure of distance and the constraint limiting the comparison of countries with different levels of economic development. The health system inputs were the numbers of physicians, nurses, and hospital beds. In the production of the intermediate outputs (doctor consultations, inpatient care discharges), the Czech Republic should look at Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. In the production of health outcomes (life expectancy), the peer countries are France, Italy and Switzerland. Conclusions The results of the DEA analysis are only indicative because no single analytical method can determine whether a health system is better or worse than others. We need to combine different methods, and DEA is one of them. We consider DEA as an exploratory method, not a method providing definitive answers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T11:06:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a82e381001ed496a977346ca42777875 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T11:06:48Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-a82e381001ed496a977346ca427778752023-11-12T12:11:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632023-11-0123111210.1186/s12913-023-10246-8Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systemsMartin Dlouhý0Faculty of Statistics and Informatics, Prague University of Economics and BusinessAbstract Background An international comparison of health system performance is a popular tool of health policy analysis. However, the efficiency evaluation of health systems is a practical example of an international comparison in which non-homogeneity is expected. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of health systems by models in which a degree of non-homogeneity among countries is considered. Methods We study the problem of non-homogeneity of health systems in the theoretical framework of the data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is a popular method of efficiency evaluation with hundreds of applications from various fields. DEA assume the homogeneity of production units and the homogeneity of the environment in which the production units operate. Hence, we compiled a summary of 14 recommendations on how to deal with the non-homogeneity in the DEA models. The analysed sample includes 38 OECD member countries. The data are from the year 2019. Results As an example, we evaluated the health system efficiency of the Czech Republic. We used the DEA models with the neighbourhood measure of distance and the constraint limiting the comparison of countries with different levels of economic development. The health system inputs were the numbers of physicians, nurses, and hospital beds. In the production of the intermediate outputs (doctor consultations, inpatient care discharges), the Czech Republic should look at Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. In the production of health outcomes (life expectancy), the peer countries are France, Italy and Switzerland. Conclusions The results of the DEA analysis are only indicative because no single analytical method can determine whether a health system is better or worse than others. We need to combine different methods, and DEA is one of them. We consider DEA as an exploratory method, not a method providing definitive answers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10246-8Health systemsData envelopment analysisEfficiency evaluationNon-homogeneity |
| spellingShingle | Martin Dlouhý Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems BMC Health Services Research Health systems Data envelopment analysis Efficiency evaluation Non-homogeneity |
| title | Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| title_full | Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| title_fullStr | Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| title_short | Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| title_sort | non homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems |
| topic | Health systems Data envelopment analysis Efficiency evaluation Non-homogeneity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10246-8 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martindlouhy nonhomogeneityintheefficiencyevaluationofhealthsystems |