Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms

Dairy cows and other ruminants contribute to human nutrition as they are able to convert feed components containing human inedible fibre concentrations (e.g. roughage and by-products from the food processing industry) into valuable animal-sourced food. A number of crops often fed to dairy cows (e.g....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S.M. Ineichen, J. Zumwald, B. Reidy, T. Nemecek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123003452
_version_ 1797384161430863872
author S.M. Ineichen
J. Zumwald
B. Reidy
T. Nemecek
author_facet S.M. Ineichen
J. Zumwald
B. Reidy
T. Nemecek
author_sort S.M. Ineichen
collection DOAJ
description Dairy cows and other ruminants contribute to human nutrition as they are able to convert feed components containing human inedible fibre concentrations (e.g. roughage and by-products from the food processing industry) into valuable animal-sourced food. A number of crops often fed to dairy cows (e.g. soy or cereals) are however potentially edible by humans too. Additionally, land used to grow dairy cattle feed may compete with crop production for human consumption. Two different methods to assess the competition between feed consumption of dairy cows and human food supply were thus refined and tested on 25 Swiss dairy farms. With respect to the potential human edibility of the feeds used in dairy production, the human-edible feed conversion ratio (eFCR) was applied. The land use ratio (LUR) was used to relate the food production potential, per area of land utilised, with the dairy production output. Low to medium eFCR, with values ranging from 0.02 to 0.68 were found, as an average proportion of 0.74 of total DM intake consisted of roughage. In contrast, we found relatively high LUR (0.69–5.93) for most farms. If the land area used to produce feed for cows was used for crop production (applying a crop rotation), 23 of the 25 farms could have produced more edible protein and all farms more human-edible energy. Indicator values strongly depend on the underlying scenarios, such as the human-edible proportion of feeds or the suitability of land and climate for crop production. Reducing the amount of human-edible feeds in dairy farming by feeding by-products from the food processing industry and improving forage quality may be suitable strategies to reduce eFCR, but relying on low-opportunity cost feeds may restrict milk performance level per cow. On farm level, improving overall efficiency and therefore using less land (especially area suitable for crop production) per kg product decreases LUR. However, the most promising strategy to mitigate land use competition may be to localise dairy production to land areas not suitable for crop production. Both methods (eFCR and LUR) should be used in parallel. They offer an opportunity to holistically evaluate the net contribution of dairy production to the human food supply under different environmental conditions and stress the importance of production systems well suited to specific farm site characteristics.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:32:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a82edff6becf47b3b87ce1ba7f48dd17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:32:27Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-a82edff6becf47b3b87ce1ba7f48dd172023-12-21T07:29:54ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112023-12-011712101028Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farmsS.M. Ineichen0J. Zumwald1B. Reidy2T. Nemecek3Bern University of Applied Sciences BFH, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL, Laenggasse 85, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Bern, SwitzerlandAgroscope, LCA Research Group, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zürich, SwitzerlandBern University of Applied Sciences BFH, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL, Laenggasse 85, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Bern, Switzerland; Corresponding author.Agroscope, LCA Research Group, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zürich, SwitzerlandDairy cows and other ruminants contribute to human nutrition as they are able to convert feed components containing human inedible fibre concentrations (e.g. roughage and by-products from the food processing industry) into valuable animal-sourced food. A number of crops often fed to dairy cows (e.g. soy or cereals) are however potentially edible by humans too. Additionally, land used to grow dairy cattle feed may compete with crop production for human consumption. Two different methods to assess the competition between feed consumption of dairy cows and human food supply were thus refined and tested on 25 Swiss dairy farms. With respect to the potential human edibility of the feeds used in dairy production, the human-edible feed conversion ratio (eFCR) was applied. The land use ratio (LUR) was used to relate the food production potential, per area of land utilised, with the dairy production output. Low to medium eFCR, with values ranging from 0.02 to 0.68 were found, as an average proportion of 0.74 of total DM intake consisted of roughage. In contrast, we found relatively high LUR (0.69–5.93) for most farms. If the land area used to produce feed for cows was used for crop production (applying a crop rotation), 23 of the 25 farms could have produced more edible protein and all farms more human-edible energy. Indicator values strongly depend on the underlying scenarios, such as the human-edible proportion of feeds or the suitability of land and climate for crop production. Reducing the amount of human-edible feeds in dairy farming by feeding by-products from the food processing industry and improving forage quality may be suitable strategies to reduce eFCR, but relying on low-opportunity cost feeds may restrict milk performance level per cow. On farm level, improving overall efficiency and therefore using less land (especially area suitable for crop production) per kg product decreases LUR. However, the most promising strategy to mitigate land use competition may be to localise dairy production to land areas not suitable for crop production. Both methods (eFCR and LUR) should be used in parallel. They offer an opportunity to holistically evaluate the net contribution of dairy production to the human food supply under different environmental conditions and stress the importance of production systems well suited to specific farm site characteristics.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123003452GrasslandHuman-edible feed conversion ratioLand use ratioLife cycle assessmentNet human food supply
spellingShingle S.M. Ineichen
J. Zumwald
B. Reidy
T. Nemecek
Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
Animal
Grassland
Human-edible feed conversion ratio
Land use ratio
Life cycle assessment
Net human food supply
title Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
title_full Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
title_fullStr Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
title_full_unstemmed Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
title_short Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
title_sort feed food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
topic Grassland
Human-edible feed conversion ratio
Land use ratio
Life cycle assessment
Net human food supply
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123003452
work_keys_str_mv AT smineichen feedfoodandlandusecompetitionoflowlandandmountaindairycowfarms
AT jzumwald feedfoodandlandusecompetitionoflowlandandmountaindairycowfarms
AT breidy feedfoodandlandusecompetitionoflowlandandmountaindairycowfarms
AT tnemecek feedfoodandlandusecompetitionoflowlandandmountaindairycowfarms