Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

Background: Cognitive–motor interference is a phenomenon in which the concomitant performance of cognitive and motor tasks results in poorer performance than the isolated performance of these tasks. We aimed to evaluate changes in dual-task performance after robotic upper extremity rehabilitation in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuem Ju Lee, Gyulee Park, Joon-Ho Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.771185/full
_version_ 1818461793808285696
author Kuem Ju Lee
Kuem Ju Lee
Gyulee Park
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joon-Ho Shin
author_facet Kuem Ju Lee
Kuem Ju Lee
Gyulee Park
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joon-Ho Shin
author_sort Kuem Ju Lee
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cognitive–motor interference is a phenomenon in which the concomitant performance of cognitive and motor tasks results in poorer performance than the isolated performance of these tasks. We aimed to evaluate changes in dual-task performance after robotic upper extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke-induced hemiplegia.Methods: This prospective study included patients with left upper limb weakness secondary to middle cerebral artery stroke who visited a rehabilitation hospital. Participants performed a total of 640 robot-assisted planar reaching movements during a therapist-supervised robotic intervention that was conducted five times a week for 4 weeks. Cognitive and motor performance was separately evaluated in single- and dual-task conditions. The digit span test and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) were used to assess cognitive performance, whereas motor performance was evaluated through kinematic assessment of the motor task.Results: In single-task conditions, motor performance showed significant improvement after robotic rehabilitation, as did the scores of the COWAT subdomains of animal naming (p < 0.001), supermarket item naming (p < 0.06), and phonemes (p < 0.05). In dual-task conditions, all motor task performance variables except mean velocity showed improvement after robotic rehabilitation. The type of cognitive task did not affect the dual-task effect, and there were no significant differences in the dual-task effects of motor, cognitive, or the sum of motor and cognitive performance after robotic rehabilitation.Conclusion: Post-stroke robotic rehabilitation has different effects on motor and cognitive function, with more consistent effects on motor function than on cognitive function. Although motor and cognitive performance improved after robotic rehabilitation, there were no changes in the corresponding dual-task effects.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T23:51:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a836991b12f7478f9c904bbf8ea2ba5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T23:51:48Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-a836991b12f7478f9c904bbf8ea2ba5f2022-12-21T22:43:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-12-011210.3389/fneur.2021.771185771185Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke PatientsKuem Ju Lee0Kuem Ju Lee1Gyulee Park2Gyulee Park3Joon-Ho Shin4Joon-Ho Shin5Department of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute, Seoul, South KoreaTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute, Seoul, South KoreaTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, South KoreaTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Korea National Rehabilitation Hospital, Seoul, South KoreaBackground: Cognitive–motor interference is a phenomenon in which the concomitant performance of cognitive and motor tasks results in poorer performance than the isolated performance of these tasks. We aimed to evaluate changes in dual-task performance after robotic upper extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke-induced hemiplegia.Methods: This prospective study included patients with left upper limb weakness secondary to middle cerebral artery stroke who visited a rehabilitation hospital. Participants performed a total of 640 robot-assisted planar reaching movements during a therapist-supervised robotic intervention that was conducted five times a week for 4 weeks. Cognitive and motor performance was separately evaluated in single- and dual-task conditions. The digit span test and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) were used to assess cognitive performance, whereas motor performance was evaluated through kinematic assessment of the motor task.Results: In single-task conditions, motor performance showed significant improvement after robotic rehabilitation, as did the scores of the COWAT subdomains of animal naming (p < 0.001), supermarket item naming (p < 0.06), and phonemes (p < 0.05). In dual-task conditions, all motor task performance variables except mean velocity showed improvement after robotic rehabilitation. The type of cognitive task did not affect the dual-task effect, and there were no significant differences in the dual-task effects of motor, cognitive, or the sum of motor and cognitive performance after robotic rehabilitation.Conclusion: Post-stroke robotic rehabilitation has different effects on motor and cognitive function, with more consistent effects on motor function than on cognitive function. Although motor and cognitive performance improved after robotic rehabilitation, there were no changes in the corresponding dual-task effects.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.771185/fullcognitive-motor interferencedual-taskmotor skillsrobotic rehabilitationstroke
spellingShingle Kuem Ju Lee
Kuem Ju Lee
Gyulee Park
Gyulee Park
Joon-Ho Shin
Joon-Ho Shin
Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
Frontiers in Neurology
cognitive-motor interference
dual-task
motor skills
robotic rehabilitation
stroke
title Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
title_full Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
title_short Differences in Dual Task Performance After Robotic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
title_sort differences in dual task performance after robotic upper extremity rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients
topic cognitive-motor interference
dual-task
motor skills
robotic rehabilitation
stroke
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.771185/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kuemjulee differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients
AT kuemjulee differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients
AT gyuleepark differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients
AT gyuleepark differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients
AT joonhoshin differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients
AT joonhoshin differencesindualtaskperformanceafterroboticupperextremityrehabilitationinhemiplegicstrokepatients