Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers

Abstract Background To investigate the frequency of temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) soon after radiotherapy (RT) and identify differences among patients with various types of head and neck cancer (HNC) and between different RT methods. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 483 patients with HNC who had c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chi-Hung Liu, Chien-Yu Lin, Bing-Shen Huang, Yi-Chia Wei, Ting-Yu Chang, Chih-Hua Yeh, Pi-Shan Sung, Jian-Lin Jiang, Li-Ying Lin, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Kang-Hsing Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02344-y
_version_ 1797451907927638016
author Chi-Hung Liu
Chien-Yu Lin
Bing-Shen Huang
Yi-Chia Wei
Ting-Yu Chang
Chih-Hua Yeh
Pi-Shan Sung
Jian-Lin Jiang
Li-Ying Lin
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Kang-Hsing Fan
author_facet Chi-Hung Liu
Chien-Yu Lin
Bing-Shen Huang
Yi-Chia Wei
Ting-Yu Chang
Chih-Hua Yeh
Pi-Shan Sung
Jian-Lin Jiang
Li-Ying Lin
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Kang-Hsing Fan
author_sort Chi-Hung Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To investigate the frequency of temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) soon after radiotherapy (RT) and identify differences among patients with various types of head and neck cancer (HNC) and between different RT methods. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 483 patients with HNC who had completed RT in our hospital after January, 2015. These patients were followed-up at the radio-oncology department and received contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) to identify metastases or recurrence of cancer at regular intervals. Meanwhile, the occurrence of TLN, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0, was recorded. We categorized the patients into nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and non-NPC groups and compared the cumulative occurrence of TLN between the groups using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. We further compared the cumulative occurrence of TLN between proton beam therapy (PBT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with any HNC, NPC, and non-NPC HNC. Results Compared with the non-NPC group, the NPC group had a higher frequency of TLN (5.6% vs. 0.4%,  p < 0.01) and were more commonly associated with TLN in the Kaplan–Meier analysis (p < 0.01) and the Cox regression model after covariates were adjusted for (adjusted hazard ratio: 13.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.37–130.61) during the follow-up period. Furthermore, the frequency of TLN was similar between patients receiving PBT and those receiving VMAT (PBT vs. VMAT: 4.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.76). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the accumulated risks of TLN were similar between PBT and VMAT in patients with any HNC (p = 0.44), NPC (p = 0.84), and non-NPC HNC (p = 0.70). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that patients with NPC are susceptible to TLN during the early period after RT. In addition, PBT may be associated with an equivalent risk of TLN when compared with VMAT in patients with NPC or other HNCs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:01:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8531310832d4b309386f1691de40a3e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-717X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:01:13Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-a8531310832d4b309386f1691de40a3e2023-11-26T13:54:06ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2023-09-0118111110.1186/s13014-023-02344-yRisk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancersChi-Hung Liu0Chien-Yu Lin1Bing-Shen Huang2Yi-Chia Wei3Ting-Yu Chang4Chih-Hua Yeh5Pi-Shan Sung6Jian-Lin Jiang7Li-Ying Lin8Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang9Kang-Hsing Fan10Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversitySchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalStroke Center, Department of Neurology, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityStroke Center, Department of Neurology, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversitySchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversitySchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityAbstract Background To investigate the frequency of temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) soon after radiotherapy (RT) and identify differences among patients with various types of head and neck cancer (HNC) and between different RT methods. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 483 patients with HNC who had completed RT in our hospital after January, 2015. These patients were followed-up at the radio-oncology department and received contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) to identify metastases or recurrence of cancer at regular intervals. Meanwhile, the occurrence of TLN, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0, was recorded. We categorized the patients into nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and non-NPC groups and compared the cumulative occurrence of TLN between the groups using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. We further compared the cumulative occurrence of TLN between proton beam therapy (PBT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with any HNC, NPC, and non-NPC HNC. Results Compared with the non-NPC group, the NPC group had a higher frequency of TLN (5.6% vs. 0.4%,  p < 0.01) and were more commonly associated with TLN in the Kaplan–Meier analysis (p < 0.01) and the Cox regression model after covariates were adjusted for (adjusted hazard ratio: 13.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.37–130.61) during the follow-up period. Furthermore, the frequency of TLN was similar between patients receiving PBT and those receiving VMAT (PBT vs. VMAT: 4.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.76). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the accumulated risks of TLN were similar between PBT and VMAT in patients with any HNC (p = 0.44), NPC (p = 0.84), and non-NPC HNC (p = 0.70). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that patients with NPC are susceptible to TLN during the early period after RT. In addition, PBT may be associated with an equivalent risk of TLN when compared with VMAT in patients with NPC or other HNCs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02344-yTemporal lobe necrosisHead and neck cancerNasopharyngeal carcinomaRadiation therapyProton therapy
spellingShingle Chi-Hung Liu
Chien-Yu Lin
Bing-Shen Huang
Yi-Chia Wei
Ting-Yu Chang
Chih-Hua Yeh
Pi-Shan Sung
Jian-Lin Jiang
Li-Ying Lin
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Kang-Hsing Fan
Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
Radiation Oncology
Temporal lobe necrosis
Head and neck cancer
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Radiation therapy
Proton therapy
title Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
title_full Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
title_short Risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
title_sort risk of temporal lobe necrosis between proton beam and volumetric modulated arc therapies in patients with different head and neck cancers
topic Temporal lobe necrosis
Head and neck cancer
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Radiation therapy
Proton therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02344-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chihungliu riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT chienyulin riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT bingshenhuang riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT yichiawei riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT tingyuchang riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT chihhuayeh riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT pishansung riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT jianlinjiang riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT liyinglin riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT josephtungchiehchang riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers
AT kanghsingfan riskoftemporallobenecrosisbetweenprotonbeamandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapiesinpatientswithdifferentheadandneckcancers