An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea

With increasing seal populations in the Baltic Sea comes growing interaction between seals and coastal fisheries. The impact of seals, mainly grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), on fisheries can be reduced by implementing of seal-safe fishing gear, which hinders seal access to catches. One successful so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Ljungberg, Sara Königson, Sven-Gunnar Lunneryd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.981822/full
_version_ 1828722425157648384
author Peter Ljungberg
Sara Königson
Sven-Gunnar Lunneryd
author_facet Peter Ljungberg
Sara Königson
Sven-Gunnar Lunneryd
author_sort Peter Ljungberg
collection DOAJ
description With increasing seal populations in the Baltic Sea comes growing interaction between seals and coastal fisheries. The impact of seals, mainly grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), on fisheries can be reduced by implementing of seal-safe fishing gear, which hinders seal access to catches. One successful solution is the introduction of a modified seal-safe trap net, the pontoon trap. In this study, pontoon traps were modified for use in cod (Gadus morhua) fisheries in the southern Baltic Sea. Three aspects of the pontoon trap design were tested for their effects on catch rates: (1) leader net mesh size; (2) leader net length; and (3) fish chamber position. The greatest catch rates were obtained using a leader net with a 100 mm center-knot to center-knot mesh-size on a bottom-set fish chamber while there was no difference in cod catch rates in relation to leader net length. There was no seal-induced damaged cod in the pontoon traps during any of the trials. Cod catch rates using the pontoon trap were also compared to those of the cod gillnet fishery in the same area. The comparison showed that during specific fishing occasions, multiple pontoon traps may have similar catch rates to gillnets.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:24:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a85c097aa405452098065d478856fba2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:24:19Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-a85c097aa405452098065d478856fba22022-12-22T03:49:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452022-10-01910.3389/fmars.2022.981822981822An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic SeaPeter Ljungberg0Sara Königson1Sven-Gunnar Lunneryd2Institute of Coastal Research, Department of Aquatic Resources Swedish, University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenInstitute of Coastal Research, Department of Aquatic Resources Swedish, University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, SwedenInstitute of Coastal Research, Department of Aquatic Resources Swedish, University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, SwedenWith increasing seal populations in the Baltic Sea comes growing interaction between seals and coastal fisheries. The impact of seals, mainly grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), on fisheries can be reduced by implementing of seal-safe fishing gear, which hinders seal access to catches. One successful solution is the introduction of a modified seal-safe trap net, the pontoon trap. In this study, pontoon traps were modified for use in cod (Gadus morhua) fisheries in the southern Baltic Sea. Three aspects of the pontoon trap design were tested for their effects on catch rates: (1) leader net mesh size; (2) leader net length; and (3) fish chamber position. The greatest catch rates were obtained using a leader net with a 100 mm center-knot to center-knot mesh-size on a bottom-set fish chamber while there was no difference in cod catch rates in relation to leader net length. There was no seal-induced damaged cod in the pontoon traps during any of the trials. Cod catch rates using the pontoon trap were also compared to those of the cod gillnet fishery in the same area. The comparison showed that during specific fishing occasions, multiple pontoon traps may have similar catch rates to gillnets.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.981822/fullseal-fisheries conflictpassive gear developmentselective gearpontoon trapseal-safe gear
spellingShingle Peter Ljungberg
Sara Königson
Sven-Gunnar Lunneryd
An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
Frontiers in Marine Science
seal-fisheries conflict
passive gear development
selective gear
pontoon trap
seal-safe gear
title An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
title_full An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
title_fullStr An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
title_full_unstemmed An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
title_short An evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing (Gadus morhua) in the southern Baltic Sea
title_sort evolution of pontoon traps for cod fishing gadus morhua in the southern baltic sea
topic seal-fisheries conflict
passive gear development
selective gear
pontoon trap
seal-safe gear
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.981822/full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterljungberg anevolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea
AT sarakonigson anevolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea
AT svengunnarlunneryd anevolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea
AT peterljungberg evolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea
AT sarakonigson evolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea
AT svengunnarlunneryd evolutionofpontoontrapsforcodfishinggadusmorhuainthesouthernbalticsea