Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania

The transition of farming systems to higher levels of productivity without overusing natural resources is of rising interest especially in African countries, where population growth has often been larger than past productivity increases. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on whether environ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen Brüssow, Anja Faße, Ulrike Grote
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/3/47
_version_ 1811304436150042624
author Kathleen Brüssow
Anja Faße
Ulrike Grote
author_facet Kathleen Brüssow
Anja Faße
Ulrike Grote
author_sort Kathleen Brüssow
collection DOAJ
description The transition of farming systems to higher levels of productivity without overusing natural resources is of rising interest especially in African countries, where population growth has often been larger than past productivity increases. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on whether environmentally friendly agricultural practices are compatible with economic interests. In the context of small-scale farm households in Tanzania, the analysis focuses on Conservation Agriculture (CA) at different levels of agricultural output, as CA is a promising toolbox for sustainable intensification. The results are based on a household survey conducted in 2014 with 900 randomly selected small-scale farmers in rural Tanzania, i.e., in semi-arid Dodoma and in semi-humid Morogoro region. We find that mulching is most frequently applied, followed by crop rotation, fallowing, intercropping and tree planting. Logit regressions show that CA adoption is influenced by socio-economic factors, farm characteristics and the regional context. Quantile regressions explain different levels of agricultural output through variables related to the extent of using CA. They indicate that marginalized farmers have the strongest crop income effect from an increased use of mulching. With increasing levels of agricultural output, the use of mulching remains beneficial for farmers, but the effect appears less pronounced.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:07:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a85f5d5332674899ae10aee304a959a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:07:15Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Resources
spelling doaj.art-a85f5d5332674899ae10aee304a959a92022-12-22T02:55:07ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762017-09-01634710.3390/resources6030047resources6030047Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural TanzaniaKathleen Brüssow0Anja Faße1Ulrike Grote2Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Policy and Resource Economics, Straubing Centre of Science, Petersgasse 18, 94315 Straubing, GermanyInstitute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover, GermanyThe transition of farming systems to higher levels of productivity without overusing natural resources is of rising interest especially in African countries, where population growth has often been larger than past productivity increases. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on whether environmentally friendly agricultural practices are compatible with economic interests. In the context of small-scale farm households in Tanzania, the analysis focuses on Conservation Agriculture (CA) at different levels of agricultural output, as CA is a promising toolbox for sustainable intensification. The results are based on a household survey conducted in 2014 with 900 randomly selected small-scale farmers in rural Tanzania, i.e., in semi-arid Dodoma and in semi-humid Morogoro region. We find that mulching is most frequently applied, followed by crop rotation, fallowing, intercropping and tree planting. Logit regressions show that CA adoption is influenced by socio-economic factors, farm characteristics and the regional context. Quantile regressions explain different levels of agricultural output through variables related to the extent of using CA. They indicate that marginalized farmers have the strongest crop income effect from an increased use of mulching. With increasing levels of agricultural output, the use of mulching remains beneficial for farmers, but the effect appears less pronounced.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/3/47Sustainable IntensificationConservation AgricultureSmall-Scale FarmingTanzania
spellingShingle Kathleen Brüssow
Anja Faße
Ulrike Grote
Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
Resources
Sustainable Intensification
Conservation Agriculture
Small-Scale Farming
Tanzania
title Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
title_full Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
title_fullStr Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
title_short Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania
title_sort is sustainable intensification pro poor evidence from small scale farmers in rural tanzania
topic Sustainable Intensification
Conservation Agriculture
Small-Scale Farming
Tanzania
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/3/47
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleenbrussow issustainableintensificationpropoorevidencefromsmallscalefarmersinruraltanzania
AT anjafaße issustainableintensificationpropoorevidencefromsmallscalefarmersinruraltanzania
AT ulrikegrote issustainableintensificationpropoorevidencefromsmallscalefarmersinruraltanzania