Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BackgroundPharmacological treatments play a significant role in treating mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the optimal doses of various drugs used for these treatments are unknown. Our study compared the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of different doses of pharmacological treatment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tingting Zhang, Nanyang Liu, Hongfu Cao, Wei Wei, Lina Ma, Hao Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2020.00778/full
_version_ 1819082714563739648
author Tingting Zhang
Nanyang Liu
Hongfu Cao
Wei Wei
Lina Ma
Hao Li
author_facet Tingting Zhang
Nanyang Liu
Hongfu Cao
Wei Wei
Lina Ma
Hao Li
author_sort Tingting Zhang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPharmacological treatments play a significant role in treating mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the optimal doses of various drugs used for these treatments are unknown. Our study compared the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of different doses of pharmacological treatments for mild to moderate AD.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (all RCTs published from the date of inception of the databases until September 19, 2019). Trials comparing the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of pharmacological interventions involving donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, memantine, huperzine A, and Ginkgo biloba extract EGb761, alone or in combination, were identified. The primary outcomes were efficacy, acceptability, and safety.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 37 studies involving 14,705 participants. In terms of improving cognitive function, galantamine 32 mg, galantamine 24 mg, donepezil 5 mg, and donepezil 10 mg were more effective than other interventions, with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 93.2, 75.5, 73.3, and 65.6%, respectively. According to the SUCRA values, EGb761 240 mg was considered to be the optimal intervention in terms of both acceptability and safety. With regard to clinical global impression, rivastigmine 12 mg had the highest probability of being ranked first (83.7%). The rivastigmine 15 cm2 patch (SUCRA = 93.7%) may be the best choice for daily living. However, there were no interventions that could significantly improve neuropsychiatric symptoms, compared with the placebo.ConclusionsDifferent doses of the tested pharmacological interventions yielded benefits with regard to cognition, acceptability, safety, function, and clinical global impressions, but not effective behaviors.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a87202555fd84ae5ad726f05937958d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:21:04Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-a87202555fd84ae5ad726f05937958d12022-12-21T18:51:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122020-05-011110.3389/fphar.2020.00778529266Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-AnalysisTingting Zhang0Nanyang Liu1Hongfu Cao2Wei Wei3Lina Ma4Hao Li5College of First Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Geratology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaInstitute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaCollege of First Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, ChinaDepartment of Geratology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Geratology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, ChinaBackgroundPharmacological treatments play a significant role in treating mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the optimal doses of various drugs used for these treatments are unknown. Our study compared the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of different doses of pharmacological treatments for mild to moderate AD.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (all RCTs published from the date of inception of the databases until September 19, 2019). Trials comparing the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of pharmacological interventions involving donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, memantine, huperzine A, and Ginkgo biloba extract EGb761, alone or in combination, were identified. The primary outcomes were efficacy, acceptability, and safety.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 37 studies involving 14,705 participants. In terms of improving cognitive function, galantamine 32 mg, galantamine 24 mg, donepezil 5 mg, and donepezil 10 mg were more effective than other interventions, with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 93.2, 75.5, 73.3, and 65.6%, respectively. According to the SUCRA values, EGb761 240 mg was considered to be the optimal intervention in terms of both acceptability and safety. With regard to clinical global impression, rivastigmine 12 mg had the highest probability of being ranked first (83.7%). The rivastigmine 15 cm2 patch (SUCRA = 93.7%) may be the best choice for daily living. However, there were no interventions that could significantly improve neuropsychiatric symptoms, compared with the placebo.ConclusionsDifferent doses of the tested pharmacological interventions yielded benefits with regard to cognition, acceptability, safety, function, and clinical global impressions, but not effective behaviors.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2020.00778/fullAlzheimer’s diseasedonepezilnetwork meta-analysispharmacological treatmentrandomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Tingting Zhang
Nanyang Liu
Hongfu Cao
Wei Wei
Lina Ma
Hao Li
Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Alzheimer’s disease
donepezil
network meta-analysis
pharmacological treatment
randomized controlled trial
title Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Different Doses of Pharmacological Treatments for Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort different doses of pharmacological treatments for mild to moderate alzheimer s disease a bayesian network meta analysis
topic Alzheimer’s disease
donepezil
network meta-analysis
pharmacological treatment
randomized controlled trial
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2020.00778/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tingtingzhang differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT nanyangliu differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT hongfucao differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiwei differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT linama differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT haoli differentdosesofpharmacologicaltreatmentsformildtomoderatealzheimersdiseaseabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis