Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought

The ubiquity of "crisis" and its sheer pervasiveness as a description of the contemporary world means that we do not so much write about crisis as much as we write from crisis. What type of thought is possible within crisis? If crisis extends to thought itself, insofar as we find ourselves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Will Daddario, Theron Schmidt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Performance Philosophy 2018-08-01
Series:Performance Philosophy
Online Access:http://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/225
_version_ 1819101625047842816
author Will Daddario
Theron Schmidt
author_facet Will Daddario
Theron Schmidt
author_sort Will Daddario
collection DOAJ
description The ubiquity of "crisis" and its sheer pervasiveness as a description of the contemporary world means that we do not so much write about crisis as much as we write from crisis. What type of thought is possible within crisis? If crisis extends to thought itself, insofar as we find ourselves in a crisis of thought (i.e., the crisis of not being able to think beyond the crisis of thought), then what kind of thinking is possible anymore? These are the questions raised by this special issue of Performance Philosophy, introduced here by the issue's co-editors.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:21:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8773b4f5b18494da6750bc43535c843
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2057-7176
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:21:38Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher Performance Philosophy
record_format Article
series Performance Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-a8773b4f5b18494da6750bc43535c8432022-12-21T18:43:43ZengPerformance PhilosophyPerformance Philosophy2057-71762018-08-01411810.21476/PP.2018.41225135Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of ThoughtWill Daddario0Theron Schmidt1Independent scholarUNSW SydneyThe ubiquity of "crisis" and its sheer pervasiveness as a description of the contemporary world means that we do not so much write about crisis as much as we write from crisis. What type of thought is possible within crisis? If crisis extends to thought itself, insofar as we find ourselves in a crisis of thought (i.e., the crisis of not being able to think beyond the crisis of thought), then what kind of thinking is possible anymore? These are the questions raised by this special issue of Performance Philosophy, introduced here by the issue's co-editors.http://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/225
spellingShingle Will Daddario
Theron Schmidt
Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
Performance Philosophy
title Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
title_full Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
title_fullStr Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
title_full_unstemmed Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
title_short Introduction: Crisis and the Im/possibility of Thought
title_sort introduction crisis and the im possibility of thought
url http://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/225
work_keys_str_mv AT willdaddario introductioncrisisandtheimpossibilityofthought
AT theronschmidt introductioncrisisandtheimpossibilityofthought