Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of six different aging methods (four types of moisture-permeable packaging, wet aging, and dry aging) and aging time (0, 7, and 14 d) on the quality of aging beef, especially physicochemical properties. The weight loss, aerobic bacterial cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yingwu Shi, Wangang Zhang, Guanghong Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/5/649
_version_ 1797567669830942720
author Yingwu Shi
Wangang Zhang
Guanghong Zhou
author_facet Yingwu Shi
Wangang Zhang
Guanghong Zhou
author_sort Yingwu Shi
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of six different aging methods (four types of moisture-permeable packaging, wet aging, and dry aging) and aging time (0, 7, and 14 d) on the quality of aging beef, especially physicochemical properties. The weight loss, aerobic bacterial counts, yeast counts, and mold counts increased with the increase of moisture permeability and aging time. However, shear force, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness followed an opposite trend with increasing moisture permeability. The values of L* and b* appeared to decrease in the dry-aged samples compared with those of the others. In addition, water content in dry-aged samples for 7 and 14 d showed a significant decrease. The higher myofibril fragmentation index was observed in dry-aged samples for 7 and 14 d compared with groups using moisture-permeable packaging. Meanwhile, the percentage of bound water and free water appeared to decrease with the increase of moisture permeability. Thus, different moisture-permeable packaging was able to control different levels of water loss and effectively reduce microbial contamination compared with dry aging. The changes of both myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI) and distribution of water indicated that moisture-permeable packaging affected the structure of myofibrils, which influenced the shear force.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:45:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a877e4713f2b4550946d994c3d638d25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:45:58Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-a877e4713f2b4550946d994c3d638d252023-11-20T00:49:30ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582020-05-019564910.3390/foods9050649Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry AgingYingwu Shi0Wangang Zhang1Guanghong Zhou2Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control (MOE), Key Laboratory of Meat Processing (MOA), Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, ChinaKey Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control (MOE), Key Laboratory of Meat Processing (MOA), Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, ChinaKey Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control (MOE), Key Laboratory of Meat Processing (MOA), Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, ChinaThe objective of this study was to investigate the effects of six different aging methods (four types of moisture-permeable packaging, wet aging, and dry aging) and aging time (0, 7, and 14 d) on the quality of aging beef, especially physicochemical properties. The weight loss, aerobic bacterial counts, yeast counts, and mold counts increased with the increase of moisture permeability and aging time. However, shear force, hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness followed an opposite trend with increasing moisture permeability. The values of L* and b* appeared to decrease in the dry-aged samples compared with those of the others. In addition, water content in dry-aged samples for 7 and 14 d showed a significant decrease. The higher myofibril fragmentation index was observed in dry-aged samples for 7 and 14 d compared with groups using moisture-permeable packaging. Meanwhile, the percentage of bound water and free water appeared to decrease with the increase of moisture permeability. Thus, different moisture-permeable packaging was able to control different levels of water loss and effectively reduce microbial contamination compared with dry aging. The changes of both myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI) and distribution of water indicated that moisture-permeable packaging affected the structure of myofibrils, which influenced the shear force.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/5/649beefagingmoisture-permeable packagingquality
spellingShingle Yingwu Shi
Wangang Zhang
Guanghong Zhou
Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
Foods
beef
aging
moisture-permeable packaging
quality
title Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
title_full Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
title_fullStr Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
title_short Effects of Different Moisture-Permeable Packaging on the Quality of Aging Beef Compared with Wet Aging and Dry Aging
title_sort effects of different moisture permeable packaging on the quality of aging beef compared with wet aging and dry aging
topic beef
aging
moisture-permeable packaging
quality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/5/649
work_keys_str_mv AT yingwushi effectsofdifferentmoisturepermeablepackagingonthequalityofagingbeefcomparedwithwetaginganddryaging
AT wangangzhang effectsofdifferentmoisturepermeablepackagingonthequalityofagingbeefcomparedwithwetaginganddryaging
AT guanghongzhou effectsofdifferentmoisturepermeablepackagingonthequalityofagingbeefcomparedwithwetaginganddryaging