One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly contribute to the prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected patients. However, it is essential to identify those who are likely to not have benefit from an ICD and to defer a pulse generator exchange. Easily implementable guidelines f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Feijen, Anastasia D. Egorova, Teresa Kuijken, Marianne Bootsma, Martin J. Schalij, Lieselot van Erven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5654
_version_ 1797582344156086272
author Michelle Feijen
Anastasia D. Egorova
Teresa Kuijken
Marianne Bootsma
Martin J. Schalij
Lieselot van Erven
author_facet Michelle Feijen
Anastasia D. Egorova
Teresa Kuijken
Marianne Bootsma
Martin J. Schalij
Lieselot van Erven
author_sort Michelle Feijen
collection DOAJ
description Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly contribute to the prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected patients. However, it is essential to identify those who are likely to not have benefit from an ICD and to defer a pulse generator exchange. Easily implementable guidelines for individual risk stratification and decision making are lacking. This study investigates the 1-year mortality of patients who underwent an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) pulse generator replacement in a contemporary real-world tertiary hospital setting. The cause of death and patient- and procedure-related factors are stratified, and predictive values for 1-year mortality are evaluated. Patients with a follow-up of ≥365 days (or prior mortality) after an ICD or CRT-D exchange at the Leiden University Medical Center from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 were eligible. In total, 588 patients were included (77% male, 69 [60–76] years old, 59% primary prevention, 46% ischemic cardiomyopathy and 37% mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)). Patients undergoing a CRT-D replacement or upgrade had a significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to patients undergoing ICD (2.8%) exchange (<i>p</i> = 0.002). LVEF ≤ 30%, New York Heart Association class ≥ 3, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min/m<sup>2</sup> and haemoglobin ≤ 7 mmol/L were independently associated with mortality within 1 year after pulse generator replacement. There is a growing need for prospectively validated risk scores to weight individualized risk of mortality with the expected ICD therapy benefit and to support a well-informed, shared decision-making process.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:19:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8b36b9662644b7a80ce5b17b18542fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:19:43Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-a8b36b9662644b7a80ce5b17b18542fb2023-11-19T08:23:32ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-08-011217565410.3390/jcm12175654One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at RiskMichelle Feijen0Anastasia D. Egorova1Teresa Kuijken2Marianne Bootsma3Martin J. Schalij4Lieselot van Erven5Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsImplantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly contribute to the prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected patients. However, it is essential to identify those who are likely to not have benefit from an ICD and to defer a pulse generator exchange. Easily implementable guidelines for individual risk stratification and decision making are lacking. This study investigates the 1-year mortality of patients who underwent an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) pulse generator replacement in a contemporary real-world tertiary hospital setting. The cause of death and patient- and procedure-related factors are stratified, and predictive values for 1-year mortality are evaluated. Patients with a follow-up of ≥365 days (or prior mortality) after an ICD or CRT-D exchange at the Leiden University Medical Center from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 were eligible. In total, 588 patients were included (77% male, 69 [60–76] years old, 59% primary prevention, 46% ischemic cardiomyopathy and 37% mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)). Patients undergoing a CRT-D replacement or upgrade had a significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to patients undergoing ICD (2.8%) exchange (<i>p</i> = 0.002). LVEF ≤ 30%, New York Heart Association class ≥ 3, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min/m<sup>2</sup> and haemoglobin ≤ 7 mmol/L were independently associated with mortality within 1 year after pulse generator replacement. There is a growing need for prospectively validated risk scores to weight individualized risk of mortality with the expected ICD therapy benefit and to support a well-informed, shared decision-making process.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5654pulse generator replacementICDCRT-Dmortality riskrisk prediction
spellingShingle Michelle Feijen
Anastasia D. Egorova
Teresa Kuijken
Marianne Bootsma
Martin J. Schalij
Lieselot van Erven
One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
Journal of Clinical Medicine
pulse generator replacement
ICD
CRT-D
mortality risk
risk prediction
title One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
title_full One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
title_fullStr One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
title_full_unstemmed One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
title_short One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk
title_sort one year mortality in patients undergoing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy pulse generator replacement identifying patients at risk
topic pulse generator replacement
ICD
CRT-D
mortality risk
risk prediction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5654
work_keys_str_mv AT michellefeijen oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk
AT anastasiadegorova oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk
AT teresakuijken oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk
AT mariannebootsma oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk
AT martinjschalij oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk
AT lieselotvanerven oneyearmortalityinpatientsundergoinganimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatororcardiacresynchronizationtherapypulsegeneratorreplacementidentifyingpatientsatrisk