Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the primary PCI proce...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249143?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1831758122590404608 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhenwei Li Yijiang Zhou Qingqing Xu Xiaomin Chen |
| author_facet | Zhenwei Li Yijiang Zhou Qingqing Xu Xiaomin Chen |
| author_sort | Zhenwei Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the primary PCI procedure is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing S-PCI with MV-PCI in patients with acute STEMI and MVD.Studies of STEMI with multivessel disease receiving primary PCI were searched in PUBMED, EMBASE and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from January 2004 to December 2014. The primary end points were long-term rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and their components-mortality, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were combined using a fixed-effects model.Of 507 citations, 10 studies (4 randomized, 6 nonrandomized; 820 patients, 562 staged PCI and 347 one-time, complete multi-vessel PCI) were included. S-PCI compared to MV-PCI significantly reduced mortality both long-term (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.66, P<0.0001, I2 = 0%) and short-term (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.1-0.51, P = 0.0003, I2 = 0%). There was a trend toward reduced risk of MACE with s-PCI compared with MV-PCI (OR 0.83, 0.62-1.12, P = 0.22, I2 = 0%). No difference between S-PCI and MV-PCI was observed in reinfarction (OR 0.97, 0.61-1.55, P = 0.91, I2 = 0%), or target vessel revascularization (OR1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.69, P = 0.40, I2 = 8%).The staged strategy for non-culprit lesions improved short- and long-term survival and should remain the standard approach to primary PCI in patients with STEMI; one-time complete multivessel PCI may be associated with greater mortality risk. However, additional large, randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal timing of a staged procedure on the non-culprit vessel in STEMI. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T00:43:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a8b7131a45f9423a803662c0e6dd7abd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T00:43:00Z |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a8b7131a45f9423a803662c0e6dd7abd2022-12-21T18:44:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e016940610.1371/journal.pone.0169406Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Zhenwei LiYijiang ZhouQingqing XuXiaomin ChenIn patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the preferred intervention is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Whether staged PCI (S-PCI) or one-time complete PCI (MV-PCI) is more beneficial and safer in terms of treating the non-culprit vessel during the primary PCI procedure is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing S-PCI with MV-PCI in patients with acute STEMI and MVD.Studies of STEMI with multivessel disease receiving primary PCI were searched in PUBMED, EMBASE and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from January 2004 to December 2014. The primary end points were long-term rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and their components-mortality, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were combined using a fixed-effects model.Of 507 citations, 10 studies (4 randomized, 6 nonrandomized; 820 patients, 562 staged PCI and 347 one-time, complete multi-vessel PCI) were included. S-PCI compared to MV-PCI significantly reduced mortality both long-term (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.66, P<0.0001, I2 = 0%) and short-term (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.1-0.51, P = 0.0003, I2 = 0%). There was a trend toward reduced risk of MACE with s-PCI compared with MV-PCI (OR 0.83, 0.62-1.12, P = 0.22, I2 = 0%). No difference between S-PCI and MV-PCI was observed in reinfarction (OR 0.97, 0.61-1.55, P = 0.91, I2 = 0%), or target vessel revascularization (OR1.17, 95% CI 0.81-1.69, P = 0.40, I2 = 8%).The staged strategy for non-culprit lesions improved short- and long-term survival and should remain the standard approach to primary PCI in patients with STEMI; one-time complete multivessel PCI may be associated with greater mortality risk. However, additional large, randomized trials are required to confirm the optimal timing of a staged procedure on the non-culprit vessel in STEMI.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249143?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Zhenwei Li Yijiang Zhou Qingqing Xu Xiaomin Chen Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_full | Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_short | Staged versus One-Time Complete Revascularization with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_sort | staged versus one time complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in stemi patients with multivessel disease a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249143?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenweili stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yijiangzhou stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qingqingxu stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaominchen stagedversusonetimecompleterevascularizationwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninstemipatientswithmultivesseldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |