Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: There is a wide variation in the management of acute “Zone 2” 5th metatarsal (MT) base fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify these differences and evaluate the effect of treating physician specialty. Methods: This was a retrospe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew T. Kingery MD, Manasa Kadiyala BS, Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS, Abhishek Ganta MD, Sanjit Konda MD, Nicole Stevens MD, Kenneth A. Egol MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00452
_version_ 1797375258875920384
author Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Nicole Stevens MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
author_facet Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Nicole Stevens MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
author_sort Matthew T. Kingery MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: There is a wide variation in the management of acute “Zone 2” 5th metatarsal (MT) base fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify these differences and evaluate the effect of treating physician specialty. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute Zone 2 5th MT fractures who presented to a single large, urban, academic medical center between December 2012 and April 2022. Zone 2 was defined as the region of the 5th MT base bordered by the 4th and 5th MT articulation on the oblique radiographic view. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of undergoing operative treatment based on provider specialty. Results: A total of 633 patients presented with Zone 2 fractures during the study period. 40.6% of patients initially presented to the ED, 36.3% to an urgent care (UC) center, and 23.1% directly to the office. Ultimately, 57.2% of patients were treated by orthopedic surgeons, 39.6% by podiatrists, and 3.2% by primary care physicians. For patients treated nonoperatively, the management plan significantly differed by treating specialty. Compared to podiatrists, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be treated in a hard sole shoe (30.8% versus 7.6%, p< 0.001) and less likely to be treated using a CAM boot (57.3% versus 76.3%, p< 0.001). Similarly, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be made WBAT compared to patients treated by podiatrists (71.8% versus 42.0%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, 2.5% of patients with Zone 2 metatarsal fractures were treated operatively. 0.5% of patients treated by orthopedic surgeons underwent surgery compared to 6.1% of patients treated by podiatrists (p=0.001). Furthermore, when controlling for age, sex, and time between injury and initial presentation to the office, the likelihood of undergoing operative treatment was still significantly greater when being treated by a podiatrist (OR=16.5, p=0.009). There is considerable heterogeneity among the treatment strategies for Zone 2 proximal 5th MT fractures. Compared to podiatrists, orthopedic surgeons are less likely to treat patients operatively and more likely to allow early weight bearing.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8ba9e6680d14039bae2de3fc707ab6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:42Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-a8ba9e6680d14039bae2de3fc707ab6c2023-12-26T19:05:49ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142023-12-01810.1177/2473011423S00452Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician SpecialtyMatthew T. Kingery MDManasa Kadiyala BSRaymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOSAbhishek Ganta MDSanjit Konda MDNicole Stevens MDKenneth A. Egol MDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: There is a wide variation in the management of acute “Zone 2” 5th metatarsal (MT) base fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify these differences and evaluate the effect of treating physician specialty. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute Zone 2 5th MT fractures who presented to a single large, urban, academic medical center between December 2012 and April 2022. Zone 2 was defined as the region of the 5th MT base bordered by the 4th and 5th MT articulation on the oblique radiographic view. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of undergoing operative treatment based on provider specialty. Results: A total of 633 patients presented with Zone 2 fractures during the study period. 40.6% of patients initially presented to the ED, 36.3% to an urgent care (UC) center, and 23.1% directly to the office. Ultimately, 57.2% of patients were treated by orthopedic surgeons, 39.6% by podiatrists, and 3.2% by primary care physicians. For patients treated nonoperatively, the management plan significantly differed by treating specialty. Compared to podiatrists, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be treated in a hard sole shoe (30.8% versus 7.6%, p< 0.001) and less likely to be treated using a CAM boot (57.3% versus 76.3%, p< 0.001). Similarly, patients treated by orthopedic surgeons were more likely to be made WBAT compared to patients treated by podiatrists (71.8% versus 42.0%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, 2.5% of patients with Zone 2 metatarsal fractures were treated operatively. 0.5% of patients treated by orthopedic surgeons underwent surgery compared to 6.1% of patients treated by podiatrists (p=0.001). Furthermore, when controlling for age, sex, and time between injury and initial presentation to the office, the likelihood of undergoing operative treatment was still significantly greater when being treated by a podiatrist (OR=16.5, p=0.009). There is considerable heterogeneity among the treatment strategies for Zone 2 proximal 5th MT fractures. Compared to podiatrists, orthopedic surgeons are less likely to treat patients operatively and more likely to allow early weight bearing.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00452
spellingShingle Matthew T. Kingery MD
Manasa Kadiyala BS
Raymond J. Walls MD, FRCS(Tr&Orth), MFSEM, FAAOS
Abhishek Ganta MD
Sanjit Konda MD
Nicole Stevens MD
Kenneth A. Egol MD
Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
title_full Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
title_fullStr Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
title_full_unstemmed Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
title_short Variations in the Management of Zone 2 5th Metatarsal Fractures Based on Physician Specialty
title_sort variations in the management of zone 2 5th metatarsal fractures based on physician specialty
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00452
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewtkingerymd variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT manasakadiyalabs variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT raymondjwallsmdfrcstrorthmfsemfaaos variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT abhishekgantamd variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT sanjitkondamd variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT nicolestevensmd variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty
AT kennethaegolmd variationsinthemanagementofzone25thmetatarsalfracturesbasedonphysicianspecialty