Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation method that is convenient and popular for clinical use. However, there is a practical issue when tDCS is applied to actual subjects, in which the geometrical variation in each model influences the effect of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheolki Im, Hyeon Seo, Sung Chan Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2019-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8594560/
_version_ 1818427546288521216
author Cheolki Im
Hyeon Seo
Sung Chan Jun
author_facet Cheolki Im
Hyeon Seo
Sung Chan Jun
author_sort Cheolki Im
collection DOAJ
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation method that is convenient and popular for clinical use. However, there is a practical issue when tDCS is applied to actual subjects, in which the geometrical variation in each model influences the effect of the predicted electric field (EF) distribution tDCS induces, and thus, may evoke unexpected EF distributions. In this paper, we investigated the effect of geometrical variations in the conventional two-pad tDCS and multi-array tDCS. For comparison, we constructed five spherical models of various thicknesses with cerebrospinal fluid and skull, as well as three anatomical head models. Thereafter, tDCS’ stimulation effects in the primary motor cortex (Brodmann area 4) were compared with respect to the EFs induced. We observed that geometrical variation’s effect is obvious for both forms of tDCS; but regardless of inter-subject variability, the multi-array tDCS montage may yield induced EFs of comparable or higher intensity and far greater focality. Thus, the multi-array tDCS is expected to have great potential to overcome inter-subject variability.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:47:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8c0b08fb0f5481d9a192be4051c75e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-3536
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:47:27Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj.art-a8c0b08fb0f5481d9a192be4051c75e82022-12-21T22:57:15ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-0178557856910.1109/ACCESS.2018.28900198594560Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields ComputedCheolki Im0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7524-3320Hyeon Seo1Sung Chan Jun2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5357-4436School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South KoreaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South KoreaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, South KoreaTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation method that is convenient and popular for clinical use. However, there is a practical issue when tDCS is applied to actual subjects, in which the geometrical variation in each model influences the effect of the predicted electric field (EF) distribution tDCS induces, and thus, may evoke unexpected EF distributions. In this paper, we investigated the effect of geometrical variations in the conventional two-pad tDCS and multi-array tDCS. For comparison, we constructed five spherical models of various thicknesses with cerebrospinal fluid and skull, as well as three anatomical head models. Thereafter, tDCS’ stimulation effects in the primary motor cortex (Brodmann area 4) were compared with respect to the EFs induced. We observed that geometrical variation’s effect is obvious for both forms of tDCS; but regardless of inter-subject variability, the multi-array tDCS montage may yield induced EFs of comparable or higher intensity and far greater focality. Thus, the multi-array tDCS is expected to have great potential to overcome inter-subject variability.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8594560/tDCSconventional two pad tDCSmulti-array tDCSgeometrical variationspherical head modelanatomical head model
spellingShingle Cheolki Im
Hyeon Seo
Sung Chan Jun
Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
IEEE Access
tDCS
conventional two pad tDCS
multi-array tDCS
geometrical variation
spherical head model
anatomical head model
title Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
title_full Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
title_fullStr Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
title_full_unstemmed Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
title_short Geometrical Variation’s Influence on the Effects of Stimulation May be Important in the Conventional and Multi-Array tDCS–Comparison of Electrical Fields Computed
title_sort geometrical variation x2019 s influence on the effects of stimulation may be important in the conventional and multi array tdcs x2013 comparison of electrical fields computed
topic tDCS
conventional two pad tDCS
multi-array tDCS
geometrical variation
spherical head model
anatomical head model
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8594560/
work_keys_str_mv AT cheolkiim geometricalvariationx2019sinfluenceontheeffectsofstimulationmaybeimportantintheconventionalandmultiarraytdcsx2013comparisonofelectricalfieldscomputed
AT hyeonseo geometricalvariationx2019sinfluenceontheeffectsofstimulationmaybeimportantintheconventionalandmultiarraytdcsx2013comparisonofelectricalfieldscomputed
AT sungchanjun geometricalvariationx2019sinfluenceontheeffectsofstimulationmaybeimportantintheconventionalandmultiarraytdcsx2013comparisonofelectricalfieldscomputed