Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects

Abstract Temperature has a profound effect on the growth and development of ectothermic animals. However, the extent to which ecologically driven selection pressures can adjust thermal plastic responses in growth schedules is not well understood. Comparing temperature‐induced plastic responses betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiit Teder, Kristiina Taits, Ants Kaasik, Toomas Tammaru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2022-12-01
Series:Evolution Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.299
_version_ 1797697136541827072
author Tiit Teder
Kristiina Taits
Ants Kaasik
Toomas Tammaru
author_facet Tiit Teder
Kristiina Taits
Ants Kaasik
Toomas Tammaru
author_sort Tiit Teder
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Temperature has a profound effect on the growth and development of ectothermic animals. However, the extent to which ecologically driven selection pressures can adjust thermal plastic responses in growth schedules is not well understood. Comparing temperature‐induced plastic responses between sexes provides a promising but underexploited approach to evaluating the evolvability of thermal reaction norms: males and females share largely the same genes and immature environments but typically experience different ecological selection pressures. We proceed from the idea that substantial sex differences in plastic responses could be interpreted as resulting from sex‐specific life‐history optimization, whereas similarity among the sexes should rather be seen as evidence of an essential role of physiological constraints. In this study, we performed a meta‐analysis of sex‐specific thermal responses in insect development times, using data on 161 species with comprehensive phylogenetic and ecological coverage. As a reference for judging the magnitude of sex specificity in thermal plasticity, we compared the magnitude of sex differences in plastic responses to temperature with those in response to diet. We show that sex‐specific responses of development times to temperature variation are broadly similar. We also found no strong evidence for sex specificity in thermal responses to depend on the magnitude or direction of sex differences in development time. Sex differences in temperature‐induced plastic responses were systematically less pronounced than sex differences in responses induced by variations in larval diet. Our results point to the existence of substantial constraints on the evolvability of thermal reaction norms in insects as the most likely explanation. If confirmed, the low evolvability of thermal response is an essential aspect to consider in predicting evolutionary responses to climate warming.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:35:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8c19021fa8947c694af9402ebb008dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-3744
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:35:58Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format Article
series Evolution Letters
spelling doaj.art-a8c19021fa8947c694af9402ebb008dd2023-09-03T13:14:38ZengOxford University PressEvolution Letters2056-37442022-12-016639441110.1002/evl3.299Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insectsTiit Teder0Kristiina Taits1Ants Kaasik2Toomas Tammaru3Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu EE‐50409 EstoniaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu EE‐50409 EstoniaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu EE‐50409 EstoniaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu EE‐50409 EstoniaAbstract Temperature has a profound effect on the growth and development of ectothermic animals. However, the extent to which ecologically driven selection pressures can adjust thermal plastic responses in growth schedules is not well understood. Comparing temperature‐induced plastic responses between sexes provides a promising but underexploited approach to evaluating the evolvability of thermal reaction norms: males and females share largely the same genes and immature environments but typically experience different ecological selection pressures. We proceed from the idea that substantial sex differences in plastic responses could be interpreted as resulting from sex‐specific life‐history optimization, whereas similarity among the sexes should rather be seen as evidence of an essential role of physiological constraints. In this study, we performed a meta‐analysis of sex‐specific thermal responses in insect development times, using data on 161 species with comprehensive phylogenetic and ecological coverage. As a reference for judging the magnitude of sex specificity in thermal plasticity, we compared the magnitude of sex differences in plastic responses to temperature with those in response to diet. We show that sex‐specific responses of development times to temperature variation are broadly similar. We also found no strong evidence for sex specificity in thermal responses to depend on the magnitude or direction of sex differences in development time. Sex differences in temperature‐induced plastic responses were systematically less pronounced than sex differences in responses induced by variations in larval diet. Our results point to the existence of substantial constraints on the evolvability of thermal reaction norms in insects as the most likely explanation. If confirmed, the low evolvability of thermal response is an essential aspect to consider in predicting evolutionary responses to climate warming.https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.299Body sizedevelopment rateevolutionary constraintgrowth ratesexual bimaturismsexual size dimorphism
spellingShingle Tiit Teder
Kristiina Taits
Ants Kaasik
Toomas Tammaru
Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
Evolution Letters
Body size
development rate
evolutionary constraint
growth rate
sexual bimaturism
sexual size dimorphism
title Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
title_full Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
title_fullStr Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
title_full_unstemmed Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
title_short Limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms: A meta‐analysis in insects
title_sort limited sex differences in plastic responses suggest evolutionary conservatism of thermal reaction norms a meta analysis in insects
topic Body size
development rate
evolutionary constraint
growth rate
sexual bimaturism
sexual size dimorphism
url https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.299
work_keys_str_mv AT tiitteder limitedsexdifferencesinplasticresponsessuggestevolutionaryconservatismofthermalreactionnormsametaanalysisininsects
AT kristiinataits limitedsexdifferencesinplasticresponsessuggestevolutionaryconservatismofthermalreactionnormsametaanalysisininsects
AT antskaasik limitedsexdifferencesinplasticresponsessuggestevolutionaryconservatismofthermalreactionnormsametaanalysisininsects
AT toomastammaru limitedsexdifferencesinplasticresponsessuggestevolutionaryconservatismofthermalreactionnormsametaanalysisininsects