Early relapse following sagittal split advancement
Early relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement (BSSA) was assessed by evaluating the cephalograms of 47 patients. The records were assigned to either screw fixation (SF: n=25) or wire osteosynthesis (WF: n=22) groups and subdivided if additional Le Fort I osteotomy was performed. 9 ske...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
1989-10-01
|
| Series: | Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1989-0021 |
| _version_ | 1797340436844511232 |
|---|---|
| author | Richard Hing N. |
| author_facet | Richard Hing N. |
| author_sort | Richard Hing N. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Early relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement (BSSA) was assessed by evaluating the cephalograms of 47 patients. The records were assigned to either screw fixation (SF: n=25) or wire osteosynthesis (WF: n=22) groups and subdivided if additional Le Fort I osteotomy was performed. 9 skeletal parameters were evaluated. The results showed that there were relatively minor differences between the screw and wire osteosynthesis groups in the first 6 weeks following surgery. Relapse of 11 percent and 22 percent was recorded respectively but this difference was not statistically significant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:02:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a8c23fe5a1ad4c399cc81463704d88b8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2207-7480 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:02:58Z |
| publishDate | 1989-10-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-a8c23fe5a1ad4c399cc81463704d88b82024-01-29T08:53:15ZengSciendoAustralasian Orthodontic Journal2207-74801989-10-0111210010610.2478/aoj-1989-0021Early relapse following sagittal split advancementRichard Hing N.01Adelaide, AustraliaEarly relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement (BSSA) was assessed by evaluating the cephalograms of 47 patients. The records were assigned to either screw fixation (SF: n=25) or wire osteosynthesis (WF: n=22) groups and subdivided if additional Le Fort I osteotomy was performed. 9 skeletal parameters were evaluated. The results showed that there were relatively minor differences between the screw and wire osteosynthesis groups in the first 6 weeks following surgery. Relapse of 11 percent and 22 percent was recorded respectively but this difference was not statistically significant.https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1989-0021relapsebilateral sagittal split advancementscrew fixationupper border wire fixationcephalometrymandibular surgery |
| spellingShingle | Richard Hing N. Early relapse following sagittal split advancement Australasian Orthodontic Journal relapse bilateral sagittal split advancement screw fixation upper border wire fixation cephalometry mandibular surgery |
| title | Early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| title_full | Early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| title_fullStr | Early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| title_full_unstemmed | Early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| title_short | Early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| title_sort | early relapse following sagittal split advancement |
| topic | relapse bilateral sagittal split advancement screw fixation upper border wire fixation cephalometry mandibular surgery |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1989-0021 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT richardhingn earlyrelapsefollowingsagittalsplitadvancement |