The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.

Conflicts fueled by popular religious mobilization have rekindled the controversy surrounding Samuel Huntington's theory of changing international alignments in the Post-Cold War era. In The Clash of Civilizations, Huntington challenged Fukuyama's "end of history" thesis that lib...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogdan State, Patrick Park, Ingmar Weber, Michael Macy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122543
_version_ 1819123108394565632
author Bogdan State
Patrick Park
Ingmar Weber
Michael Macy
author_facet Bogdan State
Patrick Park
Ingmar Weber
Michael Macy
author_sort Bogdan State
collection DOAJ
description Conflicts fueled by popular religious mobilization have rekindled the controversy surrounding Samuel Huntington's theory of changing international alignments in the Post-Cold War era. In The Clash of Civilizations, Huntington challenged Fukuyama's "end of history" thesis that liberal democracy had emerged victorious out of Post-war ideological and economic rivalries. Based on a top-down analysis of the alignments of nation states, Huntington famously concluded that the axes of international geo-political conflicts had reverted to the ancient cultural divisions that had characterized most of human history. Until recently, however, the debate has had to rely more on polemics than empirical evidence. Moreover, Huntington made this prediction in 1993, before social media connected the world's population. Do digital communications attenuate or echo the cultural, religious, and ethnic "fault lines" posited by Huntington prior to the global diffusion of social media? We revisit Huntington's thesis using hundreds of millions of anonymized email and Twitter communications among tens of millions of worldwide users to map the global alignment of interpersonal relations. Contrary to the supposedly borderless world of cyberspace, a bottom-up analysis confirms the persistence of the eight culturally differentiated civilizations posited by Huntington, with the divisions corresponding to differences in language, religion, economic development, and spatial distance.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T07:03:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8c479830aa949b39d28e48f14997b80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T07:03:06Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-a8c479830aa949b39d28e48f14997b802022-12-21T18:34:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012254310.1371/journal.pone.0122543The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.Bogdan StatePatrick ParkIngmar WeberMichael MacyConflicts fueled by popular religious mobilization have rekindled the controversy surrounding Samuel Huntington's theory of changing international alignments in the Post-Cold War era. In The Clash of Civilizations, Huntington challenged Fukuyama's "end of history" thesis that liberal democracy had emerged victorious out of Post-war ideological and economic rivalries. Based on a top-down analysis of the alignments of nation states, Huntington famously concluded that the axes of international geo-political conflicts had reverted to the ancient cultural divisions that had characterized most of human history. Until recently, however, the debate has had to rely more on polemics than empirical evidence. Moreover, Huntington made this prediction in 1993, before social media connected the world's population. Do digital communications attenuate or echo the cultural, religious, and ethnic "fault lines" posited by Huntington prior to the global diffusion of social media? We revisit Huntington's thesis using hundreds of millions of anonymized email and Twitter communications among tens of millions of worldwide users to map the global alignment of interpersonal relations. Contrary to the supposedly borderless world of cyberspace, a bottom-up analysis confirms the persistence of the eight culturally differentiated civilizations posited by Huntington, with the divisions corresponding to differences in language, religion, economic development, and spatial distance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122543
spellingShingle Bogdan State
Patrick Park
Ingmar Weber
Michael Macy
The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
PLoS ONE
title The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
title_full The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
title_fullStr The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
title_full_unstemmed The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
title_short The mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication.
title_sort mesh of civilizations in the global network of digital communication
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122543
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanstate themeshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT patrickpark themeshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT ingmarweber themeshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT michaelmacy themeshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT bogdanstate meshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT patrickpark meshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT ingmarweber meshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication
AT michaelmacy meshofcivilizationsintheglobalnetworkofdigitalcommunication