Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model

Abstract Consideration of the full annual cycle population dynamics can provide useful insight for conservation efforts, but collecting data needed to estimate demographic parameters is often logistically difficult. For species that breed in remote areas, monitoring is often conducted during migrato...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna M. Tucker, Conor P. McGowan, Bryan L. Nuse, James E. Lyons, Clinton T. Moore, David R. Smith, John A. Sweka, Kristen A. Anstead, Audrey DeRose‐Wilson, Nigel A. Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4439
_version_ 1797894413794410496
author Anna M. Tucker
Conor P. McGowan
Bryan L. Nuse
James E. Lyons
Clinton T. Moore
David R. Smith
John A. Sweka
Kristen A. Anstead
Audrey DeRose‐Wilson
Nigel A. Clark
author_facet Anna M. Tucker
Conor P. McGowan
Bryan L. Nuse
James E. Lyons
Clinton T. Moore
David R. Smith
John A. Sweka
Kristen A. Anstead
Audrey DeRose‐Wilson
Nigel A. Clark
author_sort Anna M. Tucker
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Consideration of the full annual cycle population dynamics can provide useful insight for conservation efforts, but collecting data needed to estimate demographic parameters is often logistically difficult. For species that breed in remote areas, monitoring is often conducted during migratory stopover or at nonbreeding sites, and the recruitment rate of new breeding adults can be difficult to estimate directly. Here, we present an integrated population model that uses mark‐resight and count data to estimate survival probability, population growth rate, and recruitment rate for an Arctic‐breeding shorebird of conservation concern, the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa), from data collected during spring stopover in Delaware Bay, USA, from 2005 to 2018. At this site, red knots feed primarily on the eggs of spawning horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus), a legally harvested species. We used this model to estimate the relationship between horseshoe crab abundance and red knot demographics, which informed a recent revision to the framework used to establish horseshoe crab harvest regulations. Our analysis indicates that the red knot population was most likely stable from 2005 to 2018 (average λ = 1.03, 95% credible interval [CRI]: 0.961, 1.15) despite low recruitment rates (average ρ = 0.088, 95% CRI: 0.012, 0.18). Adult survival probability was positively associated with horseshoe crab abundance in the same year (β = 0.35, 95% CRI: 0.09, 0.63), but we found no effect of horseshoe crab abundance two years previously on recruitment of new adults (β = −0.08, 95% CRI: −0.41, 0.38). Our approach demonstrates the utility of integrated population models for understanding population dynamics, even when data are only available from migratory stopover monitoring.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:09:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8c58d2be1d542b7ac09d5b0854ce9b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:09:39Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-a8c58d2be1d542b7ac09d5b0854ce9b62023-02-27T00:40:39ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252023-02-01142n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4439Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population modelAnna M. Tucker0Conor P. McGowan1Bryan L. Nuse2James E. Lyons3Clinton T. Moore4David R. Smith5John A. Sweka6Kristen A. Anstead7Audrey DeRose‐Wilson8Nigel A. Clark9U.S. Geological Survey, Iowa Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Iowa State University Ames Iowa USAU.S. Geological Survey, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Florida Gainesville Florida USABird Conservancy of the Rockies Ft. Collins Colorado USAU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Patuxent Research Refuge Laurel Maryland USAU.S. Geological Survey, Georgia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Georgia Athens Georgia USAU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center at Leetown Kearneysville West Virginia USAU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Fishery Center Lamar Pennsylvania USAAtlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Arlington Virginia USADelaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Dover Delaware USABritish Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery Norfolk UKAbstract Consideration of the full annual cycle population dynamics can provide useful insight for conservation efforts, but collecting data needed to estimate demographic parameters is often logistically difficult. For species that breed in remote areas, monitoring is often conducted during migratory stopover or at nonbreeding sites, and the recruitment rate of new breeding adults can be difficult to estimate directly. Here, we present an integrated population model that uses mark‐resight and count data to estimate survival probability, population growth rate, and recruitment rate for an Arctic‐breeding shorebird of conservation concern, the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa), from data collected during spring stopover in Delaware Bay, USA, from 2005 to 2018. At this site, red knots feed primarily on the eggs of spawning horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus), a legally harvested species. We used this model to estimate the relationship between horseshoe crab abundance and red knot demographics, which informed a recent revision to the framework used to establish horseshoe crab harvest regulations. Our analysis indicates that the red knot population was most likely stable from 2005 to 2018 (average λ = 1.03, 95% credible interval [CRI]: 0.961, 1.15) despite low recruitment rates (average ρ = 0.088, 95% CRI: 0.012, 0.18). Adult survival probability was positively associated with horseshoe crab abundance in the same year (β = 0.35, 95% CRI: 0.09, 0.63), but we found no effect of horseshoe crab abundance two years previously on recruitment of new adults (β = −0.08, 95% CRI: −0.41, 0.38). Our approach demonstrates the utility of integrated population models for understanding population dynamics, even when data are only available from migratory stopover monitoring.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4439Arctic‐breeding shorebirdsBayesian hierarchical modelingdemographic estimationintegrated population modelmigratory stopover
spellingShingle Anna M. Tucker
Conor P. McGowan
Bryan L. Nuse
James E. Lyons
Clinton T. Moore
David R. Smith
John A. Sweka
Kristen A. Anstead
Audrey DeRose‐Wilson
Nigel A. Clark
Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
Ecosphere
Arctic‐breeding shorebirds
Bayesian hierarchical modeling
demographic estimation
integrated population model
migratory stopover
title Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
title_full Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
title_fullStr Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
title_full_unstemmed Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
title_short Estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
title_sort estimating recruitment rate and population dynamics at a migratory stopover site using an integrated population model
topic Arctic‐breeding shorebirds
Bayesian hierarchical modeling
demographic estimation
integrated population model
migratory stopover
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4439
work_keys_str_mv AT annamtucker estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT conorpmcgowan estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT bryanlnuse estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT jameselyons estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT clintontmoore estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT davidrsmith estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT johnasweka estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT kristenaanstead estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT audreyderosewilson estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel
AT nigelaclark estimatingrecruitmentrateandpopulationdynamicsatamigratorystopoversiteusinganintegratedpopulationmodel