Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

To systematically review the published literature with the purpose of knowing the oral health effects of oil pulling. A systematic review of the literature was conducted across PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Campbell systematic review, and Cochrane. All papers published from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B Kumara Raja, Kavitha Devi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jiaphd.org/article.asp?issn=2319-5932;year=2021;volume=19;issue=3;spage=170;epage=179;aulast=Raja
_version_ 1819006277148213248
author B Kumara Raja
Kavitha Devi
author_facet B Kumara Raja
Kavitha Devi
author_sort B Kumara Raja
collection DOAJ
description To systematically review the published literature with the purpose of knowing the oral health effects of oil pulling. A systematic review of the literature was conducted across PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Campbell systematic review, and Cochrane. All papers published from January 2010 to March 2020 that focused on oil pulling as a study intervention were included in this review. Randomized control trials comparing oil pulling using conventional cooking oil with any controls such as chlorhexidine (CHX), placebo or routine dental hygiene practice were included. Eighty fulltext articles were analyzed initially. Among these 80 articles, only 14 articles fulfilled the research question and were included for review. A maximum of 600 participants were present across the reviewed studies, with study duration ranged between 1 and 45 days. With a high risk of bias in multiple aspects and unclear reporting of others, the methodological quality of the included studies was questionable. Among 14 studies included studies in this systematic review, nine studies compared oil pulling with CHX in the control group in which statistically significant reduction of scores was found in six studies, two studies showed a nonsignificant reduction, and one study did not report about significant difference. The quality of evidence appears to be low to recommend oil pulling as a suitable adjunct to other conventional oral hygiene methods, as most of the included studies had high or unclear risk of bias.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:06:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8d7dba4ad5a4416b33dbfd3f3d57387
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2319-5932
2350-0484
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:06:07Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-a8d7dba4ad5a4416b33dbfd3f3d573872022-12-21T19:22:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry2319-59322350-04842021-01-0119317017910.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_8_21Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trialsB Kumara RajaKavitha DeviTo systematically review the published literature with the purpose of knowing the oral health effects of oil pulling. A systematic review of the literature was conducted across PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Campbell systematic review, and Cochrane. All papers published from January 2010 to March 2020 that focused on oil pulling as a study intervention were included in this review. Randomized control trials comparing oil pulling using conventional cooking oil with any controls such as chlorhexidine (CHX), placebo or routine dental hygiene practice were included. Eighty fulltext articles were analyzed initially. Among these 80 articles, only 14 articles fulfilled the research question and were included for review. A maximum of 600 participants were present across the reviewed studies, with study duration ranged between 1 and 45 days. With a high risk of bias in multiple aspects and unclear reporting of others, the methodological quality of the included studies was questionable. Among 14 studies included studies in this systematic review, nine studies compared oil pulling with CHX in the control group in which statistically significant reduction of scores was found in six studies, two studies showed a nonsignificant reduction, and one study did not report about significant difference. The quality of evidence appears to be low to recommend oil pulling as a suitable adjunct to other conventional oral hygiene methods, as most of the included studies had high or unclear risk of bias.http://www.jiaphd.org/article.asp?issn=2319-5932;year=2021;volume=19;issue=3;spage=170;epage=179;aulast=Rajachlorhexidine mouth washcoconut oiloil pullingoral healthsesame oil
spellingShingle B Kumara Raja
Kavitha Devi
Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry
chlorhexidine mouth wash
coconut oil
oil pulling
oral health
sesame oil
title Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Oral health effects of oil pulling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort oral health effects of oil pulling a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic chlorhexidine mouth wash
coconut oil
oil pulling
oral health
sesame oil
url http://www.jiaphd.org/article.asp?issn=2319-5932;year=2021;volume=19;issue=3;spage=170;epage=179;aulast=Raja
work_keys_str_mv AT bkumararaja oralhealtheffectsofoilpullingasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kavithadevi oralhealtheffectsofoilpullingasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials