The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Advancements in motion sensing technology can potentially allow clinicians to make more accurate range-of-motion (ROM) measurements and informed decisions regarding patient management. The aim of this study was to systematically review and appraise the literature on the reliability of the Kinect, in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Beshara, David B. Anderson, Matthew Pelletier, William R. Walsh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/24/8186
_version_ 1797500859250114560
author Peter Beshara
David B. Anderson
Matthew Pelletier
William R. Walsh
author_facet Peter Beshara
David B. Anderson
Matthew Pelletier
William R. Walsh
author_sort Peter Beshara
collection DOAJ
description Advancements in motion sensing technology can potentially allow clinicians to make more accurate range-of-motion (ROM) measurements and informed decisions regarding patient management. The aim of this study was to systematically review and appraise the literature on the reliability of the Kinect, inertial sensors, smartphone applications and digital inclinometers/goniometers to measure shoulder ROM. Eleven databases were screened (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL, SPORTSDiscus, Compendex, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Proquest Science and Technology, Scopus, and PubMed). The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Reliability assessment used intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the criteria from Swinkels et al. (2005). Thirty-two studies were included. A total of 24 studies scored “adequate” and 2 scored “very good” for the reliability standards. Only one study scored “very good” and just over half of the studies (18/32) scored “adequate” for the measurement error standards. Good intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.85) and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.80) was demonstrated with the Kinect, smartphone applications and digital inclinometers. Overall, the Kinect and ambulatory sensor-based human motion tracking devices demonstrate moderate–good levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability to measure shoulder ROM. Future reliability studies should focus on improving study design with larger sample sizes and recommended time intervals between repeated measurements.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:09:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8e1c4e4c70d4c3f8c0a41857e194417
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:09:55Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-a8e1c4e4c70d4c3f8c0a41857e1944172023-11-23T10:27:56ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-12-012124818610.3390/s21248186The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPeter Beshara0David B. Anderson1Matthew Pelletier2William R. Walsh3Department of Physiotherapy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2031, AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, AustraliaPrince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, AustraliaAdvancements in motion sensing technology can potentially allow clinicians to make more accurate range-of-motion (ROM) measurements and informed decisions regarding patient management. The aim of this study was to systematically review and appraise the literature on the reliability of the Kinect, inertial sensors, smartphone applications and digital inclinometers/goniometers to measure shoulder ROM. Eleven databases were screened (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL, SPORTSDiscus, Compendex, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Proquest Science and Technology, Scopus, and PubMed). The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Reliability assessment used intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the criteria from Swinkels et al. (2005). Thirty-two studies were included. A total of 24 studies scored “adequate” and 2 scored “very good” for the reliability standards. Only one study scored “very good” and just over half of the studies (18/32) scored “adequate” for the measurement error standards. Good intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.85) and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.80) was demonstrated with the Kinect, smartphone applications and digital inclinometers. Overall, the Kinect and ambulatory sensor-based human motion tracking devices demonstrate moderate–good levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability to measure shoulder ROM. Future reliability studies should focus on improving study design with larger sample sizes and recommended time intervals between repeated measurements.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/24/8186Kinectreliabilityrange of motioninertial sensormeta-analysis
spellingShingle Peter Beshara
David B. Anderson
Matthew Pelletier
William R. Walsh
The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sensors
Kinect
reliability
range of motion
inertial sensor
meta-analysis
title The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Reliability of the Microsoft Kinect and Ambulatory Sensor-Based Motion Tracking Devices to Measure Shoulder Range-of-Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort reliability of the microsoft kinect and ambulatory sensor based motion tracking devices to measure shoulder range of motion a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Kinect
reliability
range of motion
inertial sensor
meta-analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/24/8186
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbeshara thereliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidbanderson thereliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matthewpelletier thereliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamrwalsh thereliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peterbeshara reliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT davidbanderson reliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matthewpelletier reliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamrwalsh reliabilityofthemicrosoftkinectandambulatorysensorbasedmotiontrackingdevicestomeasureshoulderrangeofmotionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis