Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities

To test the claim that digital learning tools enhance the acquisition of visual literacy in this generation of biology students, a learning intervention was carried out with 33 students enrolled in an introductory college biology course. This study compared learning outcomes following two types of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Justine C. Bell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2014-11-01
Series:Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol5/iss1/6
_version_ 1811318569014657024
author Justine C. Bell
author_facet Justine C. Bell
author_sort Justine C. Bell
collection DOAJ
description To test the claim that digital learning tools enhance the acquisition of visual literacy in this generation of biology students, a learning intervention was carried out with 33 students enrolled in an introductory college biology course. This study compared learning outcomes following two types of learning tools: a traditional drawing activity, or a learning activity on a computer. The sample was divided into two random groups. In the first intervention students learned how to draw and label a cell. Group 1 learned the material by computer and Group 2 learned the material by hand drawing. In the second intervention, students learned how to draw the phases of mitosis, and the two groups were inverted. After each learning activity, students were given a quiz, and were also asked to self-evaluate their performance in an attempt to measure their level of metacognition. At the end of the study, participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire that was used to measure the level of task engagement the students felt towards the two types of learning activities. The students who learned the material by drawing had a significantly higher average grade on the associated quiz compared to that of those who learned the material by computer. There were no other significant differences in learning outcomes between the two groups. This study provides evidence that drawing by hand is beneficial for learning biological images compared to learning the same material on a computer.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:28:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a8fc28a95ff3479db0d59ef6246eea24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1918-2902
1918-2902
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:28:15Z
publishDate 2014-11-01
publisher Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
spelling doaj.art-a8fc28a95ff3479db0d59ef6246eea242022-12-22T02:46:58ZengSociety for Teaching and Learning in Higher EducationCanadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1918-29021918-29022014-11-0151113http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2014.1.6Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing ActivitiesJustine C. Bell0Champlain College - St. Lambert CampusTo test the claim that digital learning tools enhance the acquisition of visual literacy in this generation of biology students, a learning intervention was carried out with 33 students enrolled in an introductory college biology course. This study compared learning outcomes following two types of learning tools: a traditional drawing activity, or a learning activity on a computer. The sample was divided into two random groups. In the first intervention students learned how to draw and label a cell. Group 1 learned the material by computer and Group 2 learned the material by hand drawing. In the second intervention, students learned how to draw the phases of mitosis, and the two groups were inverted. After each learning activity, students were given a quiz, and were also asked to self-evaluate their performance in an attempt to measure their level of metacognition. At the end of the study, participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire that was used to measure the level of task engagement the students felt towards the two types of learning activities. The students who learned the material by drawing had a significantly higher average grade on the associated quiz compared to that of those who learned the material by computer. There were no other significant differences in learning outcomes between the two groups. This study provides evidence that drawing by hand is beneficial for learning biological images compared to learning the same material on a computer.http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol5/iss1/6biologycollegevisual literacydigitaldrawing
spellingShingle Justine C. Bell
Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
biology
college
visual literacy
digital
drawing
title Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
title_full Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
title_fullStr Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
title_full_unstemmed Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
title_short Visual Literacy Skills of Students in College-Level Biology: Learning Outcomes following Digital or Hand-Drawing Activities
title_sort visual literacy skills of students in college level biology learning outcomes following digital or hand drawing activities
topic biology
college
visual literacy
digital
drawing
url http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol5/iss1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT justinecbell visualliteracyskillsofstudentsincollegelevelbiologylearningoutcomesfollowingdigitalorhanddrawingactivities