The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia

Abstract Background From 2013, the Zambian Corrections Service (ZCS) worked with partners to strengthen prison health systems and services. One component of that work led to the establishment of facility-based Prison Health Committees (PrHCs) comprising of both inmates and officers. We present findi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie M. Topp, Anjali Sharma, Chisela Chileshe, George Magwende, German Henostroza, Clement N. Moonga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-09-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0783-3
_version_ 1818837168916791296
author Stephanie M. Topp
Anjali Sharma
Chisela Chileshe
George Magwende
German Henostroza
Clement N. Moonga
author_facet Stephanie M. Topp
Anjali Sharma
Chisela Chileshe
George Magwende
German Henostroza
Clement N. Moonga
author_sort Stephanie M. Topp
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background From 2013, the Zambian Corrections Service (ZCS) worked with partners to strengthen prison health systems and services. One component of that work led to the establishment of facility-based Prison Health Committees (PrHCs) comprising of both inmates and officers. We present findings from a nested evaluation of the impact of eight PrHCs 18 months after programme initiation. Methods In-depth-interviews were conducted with 11 government ministry and Zambia Corrections Service officials and 6 facility managers. Sixteen focus group discussions were convened separately with PrHC members (21 females and 51 males) and non-members (23 females and 46 males) in 8 facilities. Memos were generated from participant observation in workshops and meetings preceding and after implementation. We sought evidence of PrHC impact, refined with reference to Joshi’s three domains of impact for social accountability interventions – state (represented by facility-based prison officials), society (represented here by inmates), and state-society relations (represented by inmate-prison official relations). Further analysis considered how project outcomes influenced structural dimensions of power, ability and justice relating to accountability. Results Data pointed to a compelling series of short- and mid-term outcomes, with positive impact on access to, and provision of, health services across most facilities. Inmates (members and non-members) reported being empowered via a combination of improved health literacy and committee members’ newly-given authority to seek official redress for complaints and concerns. Inmates and officers described committees as improving inmate-officer relations by providing a forum for information exchange and shared decision making. Contributing factors included more consistent inmate-officer communications through committee meetings, which in turn enhanced trust and co-production of solutions to health problems. Nonetheless, long-term sustainability of accountability impacts may be undermined by permanently skewed power relations, high rates of inmate (and thus committee member) turnover, variable commitment from some officers in-charge, and the anticipated need for more oversight and resources to maintain members’ skills and morale. Conclusion Our study shows that PrHCs do have potential to facilitate improved social accountability in both state and societal domains and at their intersection, for an extremely vulnerable population. However, sustained and meaningful change will depend on a longer-term strategy that integrates structural reform and is delivered through meaningful cross-sectoral partnership.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:18:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a900fa3162c34c4383080438b9f4550c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:18:13Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal for Equity in Health
spelling doaj.art-a900fa3162c34c4383080438b9f4550c2022-12-21T20:37:49ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762018-09-0117111310.1186/s12939-018-0783-3The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in ZambiaStephanie M. Topp0Anjali Sharma1Chisela Chileshe2George Magwende3German Henostroza4Clement N. Moonga5Centre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaZCS HeadquartersZCS HeadquartersCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaAbstract Background From 2013, the Zambian Corrections Service (ZCS) worked with partners to strengthen prison health systems and services. One component of that work led to the establishment of facility-based Prison Health Committees (PrHCs) comprising of both inmates and officers. We present findings from a nested evaluation of the impact of eight PrHCs 18 months after programme initiation. Methods In-depth-interviews were conducted with 11 government ministry and Zambia Corrections Service officials and 6 facility managers. Sixteen focus group discussions were convened separately with PrHC members (21 females and 51 males) and non-members (23 females and 46 males) in 8 facilities. Memos were generated from participant observation in workshops and meetings preceding and after implementation. We sought evidence of PrHC impact, refined with reference to Joshi’s three domains of impact for social accountability interventions – state (represented by facility-based prison officials), society (represented here by inmates), and state-society relations (represented by inmate-prison official relations). Further analysis considered how project outcomes influenced structural dimensions of power, ability and justice relating to accountability. Results Data pointed to a compelling series of short- and mid-term outcomes, with positive impact on access to, and provision of, health services across most facilities. Inmates (members and non-members) reported being empowered via a combination of improved health literacy and committee members’ newly-given authority to seek official redress for complaints and concerns. Inmates and officers described committees as improving inmate-officer relations by providing a forum for information exchange and shared decision making. Contributing factors included more consistent inmate-officer communications through committee meetings, which in turn enhanced trust and co-production of solutions to health problems. Nonetheless, long-term sustainability of accountability impacts may be undermined by permanently skewed power relations, high rates of inmate (and thus committee member) turnover, variable commitment from some officers in-charge, and the anticipated need for more oversight and resources to maintain members’ skills and morale. Conclusion Our study shows that PrHCs do have potential to facilitate improved social accountability in both state and societal domains and at their intersection, for an extremely vulnerable population. However, sustained and meaningful change will depend on a longer-term strategy that integrates structural reform and is delivered through meaningful cross-sectoral partnership.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0783-3PrisonsHealth systemsAccountabilityHealth committeesZambia
spellingShingle Stephanie M. Topp
Anjali Sharma
Chisela Chileshe
George Magwende
German Henostroza
Clement N. Moonga
The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
International Journal for Equity in Health
Prisons
Health systems
Accountability
Health committees
Zambia
title The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
title_full The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
title_fullStr The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
title_full_unstemmed The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
title_short The health system accountability impact of prison health committees in Zambia
title_sort health system accountability impact of prison health committees in zambia
topic Prisons
Health systems
Accountability
Health committees
Zambia
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-018-0783-3
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniemtopp thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT anjalisharma thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT chiselachileshe thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT georgemagwende thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT germanhenostroza thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT clementnmoonga thehealthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT stephaniemtopp healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT anjalisharma healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT chiselachileshe healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT georgemagwende healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT germanhenostroza healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia
AT clementnmoonga healthsystemaccountabilityimpactofprisonhealthcommitteesinzambia