The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets

Breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle are generally derived indoors on high-concentrate (HC) diets. Within temperate regions of north-western Europe, however, the majority of a growing beef animal’s lifetime dietary intake comes from grazed grass and grass silage. Using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Lahart, R. Prendiville, F. Buckley, E. Kennedy, S.B. Conroy, T.M. Boland, M. McGee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731120000853
_version_ 1819100475821129728
author B. Lahart
R. Prendiville
F. Buckley
E. Kennedy
S.B. Conroy
T.M. Boland
M. McGee
author_facet B. Lahart
R. Prendiville
F. Buckley
E. Kennedy
S.B. Conroy
T.M. Boland
M. McGee
author_sort B. Lahart
collection DOAJ
description Breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle are generally derived indoors on high-concentrate (HC) diets. Within temperate regions of north-western Europe, however, the majority of a growing beef animal’s lifetime dietary intake comes from grazed grass and grass silage. Using 97 growing beef cattle, the objective of the current study was to assess the repeatability of both feed intake and feed efficiency across 3 successive dietary test periods comprising grass silage plus concentrates (S+C), grazed grass (GRZ) and a HC diet. Individual DM intake (DMI), DMI/kg BW and feed efficiency-related parameters, residual feed intake (RFI) and gain to feed ratio (G : F) were assessed. There was a significant correlation for DMI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.32; P < 0.01) as well as between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.41; P < 0.001), whereas there was no association for DMI between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for DMI/kg BW between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.33; P < 0.01) and between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), but there was no association for the trait between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for RFI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05) as well as between S+C and HC periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05), whereas there was no association for RFI between the GRZ and HC periods. Gain to feed ratio was not correlated between any of the test periods. A secondary aspect of the study demonstrated that traits recorded in the GRZ period relating to grazing bite rate, the number of daily grazing bouts and ruminating bouts were associated with DMI (r = 0.28 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001), DMI/kg BW (r = 0.36 to 0.45; P < 0.01 - 0.001) and RFI (r = 0.31 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001). Additionally, the number of ruminating boli produced per day and per ruminating bout were associated with G : F (r = 0.28 and 0.26, respectively; P < 0.05). Results from this study demonstrate that evaluating animals for both feed intake and feed efficiency indoors on HC diets may not reflect their phenotypic performance when consuming conserved forage-based diets indoors or when grazing pasture.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:03:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a906169dedd14b499255c0787107e04c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:03:22Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-a906169dedd14b499255c0787107e04c2022-12-21T18:44:09ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112020-01-01141122882297The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based dietsB. Lahart0R. Prendiville1F. Buckley2E. Kennedy3S.B. Conroy4T.M. Boland5M. McGee6Animal Bioscience Department, Animal &amp; Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, P61 P302, Ireland; School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin-4 D04 V1W8, IrelandLivestock Systems Research Department, Animal &amp; Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, IrelandAnimal Bioscience Department, Animal &amp; Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, P61 P302, IrelandGrassland Science Department, Animal &amp; Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, P61 P302, IrelandIrish Cattle Breeding Federation, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon P72 X050, Co. Cork, IrelandSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin-4 D04 V1W8, IrelandLivestock Systems Research Department, Animal &amp; Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, C15 PW93, IrelandBreeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle are generally derived indoors on high-concentrate (HC) diets. Within temperate regions of north-western Europe, however, the majority of a growing beef animal’s lifetime dietary intake comes from grazed grass and grass silage. Using 97 growing beef cattle, the objective of the current study was to assess the repeatability of both feed intake and feed efficiency across 3 successive dietary test periods comprising grass silage plus concentrates (S+C), grazed grass (GRZ) and a HC diet. Individual DM intake (DMI), DMI/kg BW and feed efficiency-related parameters, residual feed intake (RFI) and gain to feed ratio (G : F) were assessed. There was a significant correlation for DMI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.32; P < 0.01) as well as between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.41; P < 0.001), whereas there was no association for DMI between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for DMI/kg BW between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.33; P < 0.01) and between the S+C and HC periods (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), but there was no association for the trait between the GRZ and HC periods. There was a significant correlation for RFI between the S+C and GRZ periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05) as well as between S+C and HC periods (r = 0.25; P < 0.05), whereas there was no association for RFI between the GRZ and HC periods. Gain to feed ratio was not correlated between any of the test periods. A secondary aspect of the study demonstrated that traits recorded in the GRZ period relating to grazing bite rate, the number of daily grazing bouts and ruminating bouts were associated with DMI (r = 0.28 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001), DMI/kg BW (r = 0.36 to 0.45; P < 0.01 - 0.001) and RFI (r = 0.31 to 0.42; P < 0.05 - 0.001). Additionally, the number of ruminating boli produced per day and per ruminating bout were associated with G : F (r = 0.28 and 0.26, respectively; P < 0.05). Results from this study demonstrate that evaluating animals for both feed intake and feed efficiency indoors on HC diets may not reflect their phenotypic performance when consuming conserved forage-based diets indoors or when grazing pasture.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731120000853beef cattlefeed efficiencyre-rankingingestive behaviourherbage intake
spellingShingle B. Lahart
R. Prendiville
F. Buckley
E. Kennedy
S.B. Conroy
T.M. Boland
M. McGee
The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
Animal
beef cattle
feed efficiency
re-ranking
ingestive behaviour
herbage intake
title The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
title_full The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
title_fullStr The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
title_full_unstemmed The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
title_short The repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high-concentrate, grass silage and pasture-based diets
title_sort repeatability of feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle offered high concentrate grass silage and pasture based diets
topic beef cattle
feed efficiency
re-ranking
ingestive behaviour
herbage intake
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731120000853
work_keys_str_mv AT blahart therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT rprendiville therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT fbuckley therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT ekennedy therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT sbconroy therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT tmboland therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT mmcgee therepeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT blahart repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT rprendiville repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT fbuckley repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT ekennedy repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT sbconroy repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT tmboland repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets
AT mmcgee repeatabilityoffeedintakeandfeedefficiencyinbeefcattleofferedhighconcentrategrasssilageandpasturebaseddiets