Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan

A key component of integrated vector management strategies is the efficient implementation of mosquito traps for surveillance and control. Numerous trap types have been created with distinct designs and capture mechanisms, but identification of the most effective trap type is critical for effective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao-Ying Pan, Lie Cheng, Wei-Liang Liu, Matthew P. Su, Hui-Pin Ho, Che-Hun Liao, Jui-Hun Chang, Yu-Chieh Yang, Cheng-Chun Hsu, Joh-Jong Huang, Chun-Hong Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.778736/full
_version_ 1818306929085120512
author Chao-Ying Pan
Lie Cheng
Wei-Liang Liu
Matthew P. Su
Matthew P. Su
Hui-Pin Ho
Che-Hun Liao
Jui-Hun Chang
Yu-Chieh Yang
Cheng-Chun Hsu
Joh-Jong Huang
Chun-Hong Chen
Chun-Hong Chen
author_facet Chao-Ying Pan
Lie Cheng
Wei-Liang Liu
Matthew P. Su
Matthew P. Su
Hui-Pin Ho
Che-Hun Liao
Jui-Hun Chang
Yu-Chieh Yang
Cheng-Chun Hsu
Joh-Jong Huang
Chun-Hong Chen
Chun-Hong Chen
author_sort Chao-Ying Pan
collection DOAJ
description A key component of integrated vector management strategies is the efficient implementation of mosquito traps for surveillance and control. Numerous trap types have been created with distinct designs and capture mechanisms, but identification of the most effective trap type is critical for effective implementation. For dengue vector surveillance, previous studies have demonstrated that active traps utilizing CO2 attractant are more effective than passive traps for capturing Aedes mosquitoes. However, maintaining CO2 supply in traps is so labor intensive as to be likely unfeasible in crowded residential areas, and it is unclear how much more effective active traps lacking attractants are than purely passive traps. In this study, we analyzed Aedes capture data collected in 2019 from six urban areas in Kaohsiung City to compare Aedes mosquito catch rates between (passive) gravitraps and (active) fan-traps. The average gravitrap index (GI) and fan-trap index (FI) values were 0.68 and 3.39 respectively at peak catch times from June to August 2019, with consistently higher FI values calculated in all areas studied. We compared trap indices to reported cases of dengue fever and correlated them with weekly fluctuations in temperature and rainfall. We found that FI trends aligned more closely with case numbers and rainfall than GI values, supporting the use of fan-traps for Aedes mosquito surveillance and control as part of broader vector management strategies. Furthermore, combining fan-trap catch data with rapid testing for dengue infections may improve the early identification and prevention of future disease outbreaks.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T06:50:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a922b447745045a9b618778325eedcd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T06:50:17Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-a922b447745045a9b618778325eedcd62022-12-21T23:56:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-03-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.778736778736Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in TaiwanChao-Ying Pan0Lie Cheng1Wei-Liang Liu2Matthew P. Su3Matthew P. Su4Hui-Pin Ho5Che-Hun Liao6Jui-Hun Chang7Yu-Chieh Yang8Cheng-Chun Hsu9Joh-Jong Huang10Chun-Hong Chen11Chun-Hong Chen12Department of Health, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, TaiwanNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, TaiwanInstitute of Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Biological Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, JapanDepartment of Health, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanDepartment of Health, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanEnvironmental Protection Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanEnvironmental Protection Bureau, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, TaiwanDepartment of Health, Kaohsiung City Government, Kaohsiung City, TaiwanNational Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, TaiwanNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, TaiwanA key component of integrated vector management strategies is the efficient implementation of mosquito traps for surveillance and control. Numerous trap types have been created with distinct designs and capture mechanisms, but identification of the most effective trap type is critical for effective implementation. For dengue vector surveillance, previous studies have demonstrated that active traps utilizing CO2 attractant are more effective than passive traps for capturing Aedes mosquitoes. However, maintaining CO2 supply in traps is so labor intensive as to be likely unfeasible in crowded residential areas, and it is unclear how much more effective active traps lacking attractants are than purely passive traps. In this study, we analyzed Aedes capture data collected in 2019 from six urban areas in Kaohsiung City to compare Aedes mosquito catch rates between (passive) gravitraps and (active) fan-traps. The average gravitrap index (GI) and fan-trap index (FI) values were 0.68 and 3.39 respectively at peak catch times from June to August 2019, with consistently higher FI values calculated in all areas studied. We compared trap indices to reported cases of dengue fever and correlated them with weekly fluctuations in temperature and rainfall. We found that FI trends aligned more closely with case numbers and rainfall than GI values, supporting the use of fan-traps for Aedes mosquito surveillance and control as part of broader vector management strategies. Furthermore, combining fan-trap catch data with rapid testing for dengue infections may improve the early identification and prevention of future disease outbreaks.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.778736/fullfan-trapgravitrapmosquito surveillancedengue fever vectormosquito trapAedes
spellingShingle Chao-Ying Pan
Lie Cheng
Wei-Liang Liu
Matthew P. Su
Matthew P. Su
Hui-Pin Ho
Che-Hun Liao
Jui-Hun Chang
Yu-Chieh Yang
Cheng-Chun Hsu
Joh-Jong Huang
Chun-Hong Chen
Chun-Hong Chen
Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
Frontiers in Public Health
fan-trap
gravitrap
mosquito surveillance
dengue fever vector
mosquito trap
Aedes
title Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
title_full Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
title_fullStr Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
title_short Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
title_sort comparison of fan traps and gravitraps for aedes mosquito surveillance in taiwan
topic fan-trap
gravitrap
mosquito surveillance
dengue fever vector
mosquito trap
Aedes
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.778736/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoyingpan comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT liecheng comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT weiliangliu comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT matthewpsu comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT matthewpsu comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT huipinho comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT chehunliao comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT juihunchang comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT yuchiehyang comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT chengchunhsu comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT johjonghuang comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT chunhongchen comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan
AT chunhongchen comparisonoffantrapsandgravitrapsforaedesmosquitosurveillanceintaiwan