Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting.
This research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts'...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5491216?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1811224088224464896 |
|---|---|
| author | Marisela Rodríguez-Salvador Rosa María Rio-Belver Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe |
| author_facet | Marisela Rodríguez-Salvador Rosa María Rio-Belver Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe |
| author_sort | Marisela Rodríguez-Salvador |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts' feedback. It enables the definition of the growth rate of scientific and technological output in terms of the top countries, institutions and journals producing knowledge within the field as well as the identification of main areas of research and development by analyzing the International Patent Classification codes including keyword clusterization and co-occurrence of patent assignees and patent codes. This model was applied to the evolving domain of 3D bioprinting. Scientific documents from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, along with patents from 27 authorities and 140 countries, were retrieved. In total, 4782 scientific publications and 706 patents were identified from 2000 to mid-2016. The number of scientific documents published and patents in the last five years showed an annual average growth of 20% and 40%, respectively. Results indicate that the most prolific nations and institutions publishing on 3D bioprinting are the USA and China, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA), Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and Tsinghua University (China), respectively. Biomaterials and Biofabrication are the predominant journals. The most prolific patenting countries are China and the USA; while Organovo Holdings Inc. (USA) and Tsinghua University (China) are the institutions leading. International Patent Classification codes reveal that most 3D bioprinting inventions intended for medical purposes apply porous or cellular materials or biologically active materials. Knowledge clusters and expert drivers indicate that there is a research focus on tissue engineering including the fabrication of organs, bioinks and new 3D bioprinting systems. Our model offers a guide to researchers to understand the knowledge production of pioneering technologies, in this case 3D bioprinting. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:43:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a92ce99865e0477caf498795b74830ef |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:43:00Z |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-a92ce99865e0477caf498795b74830ef2022-12-22T03:39:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e018037510.1371/journal.pone.0180375Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting.Marisela Rodríguez-SalvadorRosa María Rio-BelverGaizka Garechana-AnacabeThis research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts' feedback. It enables the definition of the growth rate of scientific and technological output in terms of the top countries, institutions and journals producing knowledge within the field as well as the identification of main areas of research and development by analyzing the International Patent Classification codes including keyword clusterization and co-occurrence of patent assignees and patent codes. This model was applied to the evolving domain of 3D bioprinting. Scientific documents from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, along with patents from 27 authorities and 140 countries, were retrieved. In total, 4782 scientific publications and 706 patents were identified from 2000 to mid-2016. The number of scientific documents published and patents in the last five years showed an annual average growth of 20% and 40%, respectively. Results indicate that the most prolific nations and institutions publishing on 3D bioprinting are the USA and China, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA), Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and Tsinghua University (China), respectively. Biomaterials and Biofabrication are the predominant journals. The most prolific patenting countries are China and the USA; while Organovo Holdings Inc. (USA) and Tsinghua University (China) are the institutions leading. International Patent Classification codes reveal that most 3D bioprinting inventions intended for medical purposes apply porous or cellular materials or biologically active materials. Knowledge clusters and expert drivers indicate that there is a research focus on tissue engineering including the fabrication of organs, bioinks and new 3D bioprinting systems. Our model offers a guide to researchers to understand the knowledge production of pioneering technologies, in this case 3D bioprinting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5491216?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Marisela Rodríguez-Salvador Rosa María Rio-Belver Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. PLoS ONE |
| title | Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. |
| title_full | Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. |
| title_fullStr | Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. |
| title_short | Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. |
| title_sort | scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies the case of 3d bioprinting |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5491216?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariselarodriguezsalvador scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting AT rosamariariobelver scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting AT gaizkagarechanaanacabe scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting |