Welfare of pigs on farm

Abstract This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin‐Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Barbara Padalino, Helen Clare Roberts, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Sandra Edwards, Sonya Ivanova, Christine Leeb, Beat Wechsler, Chiara Fabris, Eliana Lima, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali, Hans Spoolder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-08-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421
_version_ 1817983170036891648
author EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Elisabetta Canali
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas
Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Barbara Padalino
Helen Clare Roberts
Karl Stahl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Sandra Edwards
Sonya Ivanova
Christine Leeb
Beat Wechsler
Chiara Fabris
Eliana Lima
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Yves Van der Stede
Marika Vitali
Hans Spoolder
author_facet EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Elisabetta Canali
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas
Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Barbara Padalino
Helen Clare Roberts
Karl Stahl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Sandra Edwards
Sonya Ivanova
Christine Leeb
Beat Wechsler
Chiara Fabris
Eliana Lima
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Yves Van der Stede
Marika Vitali
Hans Spoolder
author_sort EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal‐based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. Recommendations are also provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of pigs related to tail biting and related to the European Citizen's Initiative ‘End the Cage Age’. For example, the AHAW Panel recommends how to mitigate group stress when dry sows and gilts are grouped immediately after weaning or in early pregnancy. Results of a comparative qualitative assessment suggested that long‐stemmed or long‐cut straw, hay or haylage is the most suitable material for nest‐building. A period of time will be needed for staff and animals to adapt to housing lactating sows and their piglets in farrowing pens (as opposed to crates) before achieving stable welfare outcomes. The panel recommends a minimum available space to the lactating sow to ensure piglet welfare (measured by live‐born piglet mortality). Among the main risk factors for tail biting are space allowance, types of flooring, air quality, health status and diet composition, while weaning age was not associated directly with tail biting in later life. The relationship between the availability of space and growth rate, lying behaviour and tail biting in rearing pigs is quantified and presented. Finally, the panel suggests a set of ABMs to use at slaughter for monitoring on‐farm welfare of cull sows and rearing pigs.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:30:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9492ab12feb4a2a9ef76e5d840d2246
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:30:01Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-a9492ab12feb4a2a9ef76e5d840d22462022-12-22T02:24:57ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322022-08-01208n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421Welfare of pigs on farmEFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)Søren Saxmose NielsenJulio AlvarezDominique Joseph BicoutPaolo CalistriElisabetta CanaliJulian Ashley DreweBruno Garin‐BastujiJose Luis Gonzales RojasGortázar SchmidtMette HerskinVirginie MichelMiguel Ángel Miranda ChuecaOlaf Mosbach‐SchulzBarbara PadalinoHelen Clare RobertsKarl StahlAntonio VelardeArvo ViltropChristoph WincklerSandra EdwardsSonya IvanovaChristine LeebBeat WechslerChiara FabrisEliana LimaOlaf Mosbach‐SchulzYves Van der StedeMarika VitaliHans SpoolderAbstract This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal‐based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. Recommendations are also provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of pigs related to tail biting and related to the European Citizen's Initiative ‘End the Cage Age’. For example, the AHAW Panel recommends how to mitigate group stress when dry sows and gilts are grouped immediately after weaning or in early pregnancy. Results of a comparative qualitative assessment suggested that long‐stemmed or long‐cut straw, hay or haylage is the most suitable material for nest‐building. A period of time will be needed for staff and animals to adapt to housing lactating sows and their piglets in farrowing pens (as opposed to crates) before achieving stable welfare outcomes. The panel recommends a minimum available space to the lactating sow to ensure piglet welfare (measured by live‐born piglet mortality). Among the main risk factors for tail biting are space allowance, types of flooring, air quality, health status and diet composition, while weaning age was not associated directly with tail biting in later life. The relationship between the availability of space and growth rate, lying behaviour and tail biting in rearing pigs is quantified and presented. Finally, the panel suggests a set of ABMs to use at slaughter for monitoring on‐farm welfare of cull sows and rearing pigs.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421on‐farm pig welfarepig categorieshusbandry systemswelfare consequencesanimal‐based measuresend the cage age
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Julio Alvarez
Dominique Joseph Bicout
Paolo Calistri
Elisabetta Canali
Julian Ashley Drewe
Bruno Garin‐Bastuji
Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas
Gortázar Schmidt
Mette Herskin
Virginie Michel
Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Barbara Padalino
Helen Clare Roberts
Karl Stahl
Antonio Velarde
Arvo Viltrop
Christoph Winckler
Sandra Edwards
Sonya Ivanova
Christine Leeb
Beat Wechsler
Chiara Fabris
Eliana Lima
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Yves Van der Stede
Marika Vitali
Hans Spoolder
Welfare of pigs on farm
EFSA Journal
on‐farm pig welfare
pig categories
husbandry systems
welfare consequences
animal‐based measures
end the cage age
title Welfare of pigs on farm
title_full Welfare of pigs on farm
title_fullStr Welfare of pigs on farm
title_full_unstemmed Welfare of pigs on farm
title_short Welfare of pigs on farm
title_sort welfare of pigs on farm
topic on‐farm pig welfare
pig categories
husbandry systems
welfare consequences
animal‐based measures
end the cage age
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonanimalhealthandwelfareahaw welfareofpigsonfarm
AT sørensaxmosenielsen welfareofpigsonfarm
AT julioalvarez welfareofpigsonfarm
AT dominiquejosephbicout welfareofpigsonfarm
AT paolocalistri welfareofpigsonfarm
AT elisabettacanali welfareofpigsonfarm
AT julianashleydrewe welfareofpigsonfarm
AT brunogarinbastuji welfareofpigsonfarm
AT joseluisgonzalesrojas welfareofpigsonfarm
AT gortazarschmidt welfareofpigsonfarm
AT metteherskin welfareofpigsonfarm
AT virginiemichel welfareofpigsonfarm
AT miguelangelmirandachueca welfareofpigsonfarm
AT olafmosbachschulz welfareofpigsonfarm
AT barbarapadalino welfareofpigsonfarm
AT helenclareroberts welfareofpigsonfarm
AT karlstahl welfareofpigsonfarm
AT antoniovelarde welfareofpigsonfarm
AT arvoviltrop welfareofpigsonfarm
AT christophwinckler welfareofpigsonfarm
AT sandraedwards welfareofpigsonfarm
AT sonyaivanova welfareofpigsonfarm
AT christineleeb welfareofpigsonfarm
AT beatwechsler welfareofpigsonfarm
AT chiarafabris welfareofpigsonfarm
AT elianalima welfareofpigsonfarm
AT olafmosbachschulz welfareofpigsonfarm
AT yvesvanderstede welfareofpigsonfarm
AT marikavitali welfareofpigsonfarm
AT hansspoolder welfareofpigsonfarm