The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials

Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munther N. Kazanji, Nadia T. Jaffer
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2009-08-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.html
_version_ 1811258370081947648
author Munther N. Kazanji
Nadia T. Jaffer
author_facet Munther N. Kazanji
Nadia T. Jaffer
author_sort Munther N. Kazanji
collection DOAJ
description Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere prepared in a disc shape 30 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness (2 mm for acrylic resin part and 2mm for soft lining material part). Soft lining materials were bonded to three different groups ofacrylic resin surface pretreatments (untreated, sandblasted and monomer treated denture base). Thesespecimens underwent two aging procedures: Storage with two periods (one week and one month), and500 cycles of thermalcycling inside 2% methylene blue dye. Results: Statistical analysis showed thattreating the acrylic resin denture base by sandblasting increased microleakage of silicone–based linings(UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B)and decreased microleakage of acrylic–based linings (Tru–soft and Bonyplus) in comparison to untreated denture base, while treating the denture base with MMA monomerpositively decreased microleakage for all tested soft lining materials in relation to untreated andsandblasted denture base at one week storage, one month storage and at thermalcycling. Conclusions:For all types of denture base surface treatments, microleakage was inevitable, however, wetting theacrylic resin denture base with MMA monomer was more effective in reducing microkeakage thansandblasted and untreated denture bases.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:13:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a966d3fecf794be9a3724d0c26c5c749
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:13:15Z
publishDate 2009-08-01
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
record_format Article
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
spelling doaj.art-a966d3fecf794be9a3724d0c26c5c7492022-12-22T03:21:45ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal1812-12171998-03452009-08-019216817410.33899/rden.2009.9109The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining MaterialsMunther N. Kazanji Nadia T. Jaffer Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere prepared in a disc shape 30 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness (2 mm for acrylic resin part and 2mm for soft lining material part). Soft lining materials were bonded to three different groups ofacrylic resin surface pretreatments (untreated, sandblasted and monomer treated denture base). Thesespecimens underwent two aging procedures: Storage with two periods (one week and one month), and500 cycles of thermalcycling inside 2% methylene blue dye. Results: Statistical analysis showed thattreating the acrylic resin denture base by sandblasting increased microleakage of silicone–based linings(UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B)and decreased microleakage of acrylic–based linings (Tru–soft and Bonyplus) in comparison to untreated denture base, while treating the denture base with MMA monomerpositively decreased microleakage for all tested soft lining materials in relation to untreated andsandblasted denture base at one week storage, one month storage and at thermalcycling. Conclusions:For all types of denture base surface treatments, microleakage was inevitable, however, wetting theacrylic resin denture base with MMA monomer was more effective in reducing microkeakage thansandblasted and untreated denture bases.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.htmlmicroleakagesurface treatmentssoft lining materials
spellingShingle Munther N. Kazanji
Nadia T. Jaffer
The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
microleakage
surface treatments
soft lining materials
title The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
title_full The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
title_fullStr The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
title_short The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
title_sort effect of denture base surface treatments on microlekage of soft lining materials
topic microleakage
surface treatments
soft lining materials
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.html
work_keys_str_mv AT munthernkazanji theeffectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials
AT nadiatjaffer theeffectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials
AT munthernkazanji effectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials
AT nadiatjaffer effectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials