The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials
Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere p...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
2009-08-01
|
Series: | Al-Rafidain Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.html |
_version_ | 1811258370081947648 |
---|---|
author | Munther N. Kazanji Nadia T. Jaffer |
author_facet | Munther N. Kazanji Nadia T. Jaffer |
author_sort | Munther N. Kazanji |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere prepared in a disc shape 30 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness (2 mm for acrylic resin part and 2mm for soft lining material part). Soft lining materials were bonded to three different groups ofacrylic resin surface pretreatments (untreated, sandblasted and monomer treated denture base). Thesespecimens underwent two aging procedures: Storage with two periods (one week and one month), and500 cycles of thermalcycling inside 2% methylene blue dye. Results: Statistical analysis showed thattreating the acrylic resin denture base by sandblasting increased microleakage of silicone–based linings(UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B)and decreased microleakage of acrylic–based linings (Tru–soft and Bonyplus) in comparison to untreated denture base, while treating the denture base with MMA monomerpositively decreased microleakage for all tested soft lining materials in relation to untreated andsandblasted denture base at one week storage, one month storage and at thermalcycling. Conclusions:For all types of denture base surface treatments, microleakage was inevitable, however, wetting theacrylic resin denture base with MMA monomer was more effective in reducing microkeakage thansandblasted and untreated denture bases. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:13:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-a966d3fecf794be9a3724d0c26c5c749 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1812-1217 1998-0345 |
language | Arabic |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:13:15Z |
publishDate | 2009-08-01 |
publisher | University of Mosul, College of Dentistry |
record_format | Article |
series | Al-Rafidain Dental Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-a966d3fecf794be9a3724d0c26c5c7492022-12-22T03:21:45ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal1812-12171998-03452009-08-019216817410.33899/rden.2009.9109The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining MaterialsMunther N. Kazanji Nadia T. Jaffer Aims: To evaluate the effect of two acrylic resin denture base surface trearments on microleakageof 4 soft denture lining materials (Tru–soft, Bony plus, UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B after 2 periods ofstorage and thermalcycling. Materials and methods: One hundred eighty specimens for microleakagewere prepared in a disc shape 30 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness (2 mm for acrylic resin part and 2mm for soft lining material part). Soft lining materials were bonded to three different groups ofacrylic resin surface pretreatments (untreated, sandblasted and monomer treated denture base). Thesespecimens underwent two aging procedures: Storage with two periods (one week and one month), and500 cycles of thermalcycling inside 2% methylene blue dye. Results: Statistical analysis showed thattreating the acrylic resin denture base by sandblasting increased microleakage of silicone–based linings(UfiGel–P and Molloplast–B)and decreased microleakage of acrylic–based linings (Tru–soft and Bonyplus) in comparison to untreated denture base, while treating the denture base with MMA monomerpositively decreased microleakage for all tested soft lining materials in relation to untreated andsandblasted denture base at one week storage, one month storage and at thermalcycling. Conclusions:For all types of denture base surface treatments, microleakage was inevitable, however, wetting theacrylic resin denture base with MMA monomer was more effective in reducing microkeakage thansandblasted and untreated denture bases.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.htmlmicroleakagesurface treatmentssoft lining materials |
spellingShingle | Munther N. Kazanji Nadia T. Jaffer The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials Al-Rafidain Dental Journal microleakage surface treatments soft lining materials |
title | The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials |
title_full | The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials |
title_short | The Effect of Denture Base Surface Treatments on Microlekage of Soft Lining Materials |
title_sort | effect of denture base surface treatments on microlekage of soft lining materials |
topic | microleakage surface treatments soft lining materials |
url | https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9109_5020311df517892d559b5d10d17916a7.html |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munthernkazanji theeffectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials AT nadiatjaffer theeffectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials AT munthernkazanji effectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials AT nadiatjaffer effectofdenturebasesurfacetreatmentsonmicrolekageofsoftliningmaterials |