An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different uterine closure techniques, used during cesarean section (CS) operations on isthmocele formation. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed on 138 patients in a university hospital be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziya Kalem, Aski Ellibes Kaya, Batuhan Bakırarar, Alper Basbug, Müberra Namlı Kalem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Investigative Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1610530
_version_ 1797684689937367040
author Ziya Kalem
Aski Ellibes Kaya
Batuhan Bakırarar
Alper Basbug
Müberra Namlı Kalem
author_facet Ziya Kalem
Aski Ellibes Kaya
Batuhan Bakırarar
Alper Basbug
Müberra Namlı Kalem
author_sort Ziya Kalem
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different uterine closure techniques, used during cesarean section (CS) operations on isthmocele formation. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed on 138 patients in a university hospital between the dates December 2016 and August 2017. Uterine closures were performed using the double-layer, far-far-near-near (FFNN) unlocked technique, in the study group (n = 70) and using a single-layer continuous locked (SLL) technique in the control group (n = 68). The presence of isthmocele, residual myometrial thickness (RMT), postmenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain and uterus position were evaluated in postoperative sixth month. Results: Isthmocele formation was less frequent and RMT was greater in the study group when compared to the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Duration of operation, amount of blood loss and additional hemostatic suture requirement were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.221, p = 0.520 and p = 0.930, respectively). Postmenstrual spotting was less common in FFNN group, while the rates of chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.205 and p = 0.490, respectively). Conclusion: The findings of the present study demonstrate that uterine closure using the FFNN technique is beneficial in terms of providing protection from isthmocele formation and ensuring sufficient RMT. This method has the potential to become the optimal uterine closure technique, but the findings of the present study should be supported by large-scale studies in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:33:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a96824654e1e47eab8f36255af0b0eca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0894-1939
1521-0553
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:33:21Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Investigative Surgery
spelling doaj.art-a96824654e1e47eab8f36255af0b0eca2023-09-15T10:07:30ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Investigative Surgery0894-19391521-05532021-02-0134214815610.1080/08941939.2019.16105301610530An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled StudyZiya Kalem0Aski Ellibes Kaya1Batuhan Bakırarar2Alper Basbug3Müberra Namlı Kalem4Gurgan Clinic IVF and Women Health CenterDuzce UniversityAnkara UniversityDuzce UniversityLiv Hospital AnkaraObjective: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two different uterine closure techniques, used during cesarean section (CS) operations on isthmocele formation. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study was performed on 138 patients in a university hospital between the dates December 2016 and August 2017. Uterine closures were performed using the double-layer, far-far-near-near (FFNN) unlocked technique, in the study group (n = 70) and using a single-layer continuous locked (SLL) technique in the control group (n = 68). The presence of isthmocele, residual myometrial thickness (RMT), postmenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain and uterus position were evaluated in postoperative sixth month. Results: Isthmocele formation was less frequent and RMT was greater in the study group when compared to the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Duration of operation, amount of blood loss and additional hemostatic suture requirement were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.221, p = 0.520 and p = 0.930, respectively). Postmenstrual spotting was less common in FFNN group, while the rates of chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.205 and p = 0.490, respectively). Conclusion: The findings of the present study demonstrate that uterine closure using the FFNN technique is beneficial in terms of providing protection from isthmocele formation and ensuring sufficient RMT. This method has the potential to become the optimal uterine closure technique, but the findings of the present study should be supported by large-scale studies in the future.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1610530cesareanisthmocelesuturing techniqueresidual myometrial thicknessscar healingdouble-layer suturing
spellingShingle Ziya Kalem
Aski Ellibes Kaya
Batuhan Bakırarar
Alper Basbug
Müberra Namlı Kalem
An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
Journal of Investigative Surgery
cesarean
isthmocele
suturing technique
residual myometrial thickness
scar healing
double-layer suturing
title An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort optimal uterine closure technique for better scar healing and avoiding isthmocele in cesarean section a randomized controlled study
topic cesarean
isthmocele
suturing technique
residual myometrial thickness
scar healing
double-layer suturing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1610530
work_keys_str_mv AT ziyakalem anoptimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT askiellibeskaya anoptimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT batuhanbakırarar anoptimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT alperbasbug anoptimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT muberranamlıkalem anoptimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ziyakalem optimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT askiellibeskaya optimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT batuhanbakırarar optimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT alperbasbug optimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT muberranamlıkalem optimaluterineclosuretechniqueforbetterscarhealingandavoidingisthmoceleincesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy