Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nickel-titanium file systems with different taper angles working with rotation and reciprocation motion on the amount of debris extruding apically. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was performed using the Myers and Montgomery model. Forty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gazi University 2023-09-01
Series:Acta Odontologica Turcica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2536951
_version_ 1797692747373608960
author Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
author_facet Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
author_sort Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nickel-titanium file systems with different taper angles working with rotation and reciprocation motion on the amount of debris extruding apically. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was performed using the Myers and Montgomery model. Forty-five human maxillary anterior teeth were inserted into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and randomly classified into three groups. After manual glide-path preparation, the teeth in each group were instrumented to the working length set 1 mm short of the anatomical apex using the standard sequence provided by the manufacturers: Group 1: Reciproc Blue (Easy In Smile, New Jersey, USA), Group 2: T-endo must (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey),Group 3: T-endo mis (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey). Root canals were irrigated with 10 mL 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and distilled water between each file insertion. The tubes with collected debris were stored in an incubator at 70°C for 7 days. Measurement of the weight of extruded debris was performed by subtracting the pre-instrumentation from the post-instrumentation weight of the tubes. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference Test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The weights of the apically extruded debris were 0.0094±0.0015 g in Group 1, 0.0075±0.0012 g in Group 2, and 0.0044±0.0010 g in Group 3, and the difference between all groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The amount of apically extruded debris is related to the taper angle of the file used and the kinematics of the file.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:33:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a974582a476c404cbab31e3371182198
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2147-690X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:33:03Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Gazi University
record_format Article
series Acta Odontologica Turcica
spelling doaj.art-a974582a476c404cbab31e33711821982023-09-05T07:35:49ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2023-09-01403798310.17214/gaziaot.114342329Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue FilesFunda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci0ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nickel-titanium file systems with different taper angles working with rotation and reciprocation motion on the amount of debris extruding apically. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was performed using the Myers and Montgomery model. Forty-five human maxillary anterior teeth were inserted into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and randomly classified into three groups. After manual glide-path preparation, the teeth in each group were instrumented to the working length set 1 mm short of the anatomical apex using the standard sequence provided by the manufacturers: Group 1: Reciproc Blue (Easy In Smile, New Jersey, USA), Group 2: T-endo must (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey),Group 3: T-endo mis (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey). Root canals were irrigated with 10 mL 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and distilled water between each file insertion. The tubes with collected debris were stored in an incubator at 70°C for 7 days. Measurement of the weight of extruded debris was performed by subtracting the pre-instrumentation from the post-instrumentation weight of the tubes. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference Test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The weights of the apically extruded debris were 0.0094±0.0015 g in Group 1, 0.0075±0.0012 g in Group 2, and 0.0044±0.0010 g in Group 3, and the difference between all groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The amount of apically extruded debris is related to the taper angle of the file used and the kinematics of the file.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2536951apical foramenendodonticsroot canal preparationroot canal therapyapikal foramenendodontikök kanalını hazırlamakök kanal tedavisi
spellingShingle Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
Acta Odontologica Turcica
apical foramen
endodontics
root canal preparation
root canal therapy
apikal foramen
endodonti
kök kanalını hazırlama
kök kanal tedavisi
title Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
title_full Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
title_fullStr Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
title_short Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
title_sort comparison of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using t endo must t endo mis and reciproc blue files
topic apical foramen
endodontics
root canal preparation
root canal therapy
apikal foramen
endodonti
kök kanalını hazırlama
kök kanal tedavisi
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2536951
work_keys_str_mv AT fundafundaoglukucukekenci comparisonofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringrootcanalinstrumentationusingtendomusttendomisandreciprocbluefiles