From the Editors – Redactioneel

Sometimes an issue grows naturally into a theme number. The occasion was the celebration of two hundred years of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which is almost over. BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review has put the most important publications that emerged in connection with this milestone into a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Catrien Santing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: openjournals.nl 2015-12-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/6387
_version_ 1818774171525578752
author Catrien Santing
author_facet Catrien Santing
author_sort Catrien Santing
collection DOAJ
description Sometimes an issue grows naturally into a theme number. The occasion was the celebration of two hundred years of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which is almost over. BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review has put the most important publications that emerged in connection with this milestone into a historiographical context and judged them on their merits and blind spots. In the forum ‘The Bicentennial 1813-1815’ James Kennedy, Gita Deneckere, Matthijs Lok and Alicia Schrikker take an historiographical approach and tackle the various commemorative works from the point of view of such questions as continuitydiscontinuity of the Ancien Régime in the Netherlands/Belgium 1813-1831, the national history writing about this period in the Netherlands and Belgium and the situation in the colonies, something often forgotten. Tom Verschaffel succesfully reviews three royal biographies within a single framework and points out the similarities and differences between the three. The perceptive analyses of all these monumental works to which the occasion has given rise appear to accord well with other royal material, which indicates that this is a vigorous field of research. Frans Willem Lantink demonstrates this in his dissection of the usual genres dealing with the subject. Susie Protschky extends the area of royalty research to the Netherlands-Indies. She makes clear the role played by photographs in establishing the ‘imagined community’ of royalists who were faithful to the Dutch fatherland and Queen Wilhelmina. In the discussion dossier on historical reasoning Dick de Boer, Peter Henderikx, Roos van Oosten and Erik Cordfunke and George Maat discuss the importance of innovative methods borrowed from physics and technology, in trying to solve tricky historical questions, but even this debate has a royal tinge. The protagonist, or perhaps it would be better to speak of the subject because it is about his remains, is the Dutch Count William II, elected as the King ofthe Romans in 1247. The editors hope you will royally enjoy reading this new number.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:36:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9784e182b1346189a2366c070b1ee5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:36:54Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher openjournals.nl
record_format Article
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
spelling doaj.art-a9784e182b1346189a2366c070b1ee5c2022-12-21T21:10:44Zengopenjournals.nlBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982015-12-011304From the Editors – RedactioneelCatrien SantingSometimes an issue grows naturally into a theme number. The occasion was the celebration of two hundred years of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which is almost over. BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review has put the most important publications that emerged in connection with this milestone into a historiographical context and judged them on their merits and blind spots. In the forum ‘The Bicentennial 1813-1815’ James Kennedy, Gita Deneckere, Matthijs Lok and Alicia Schrikker take an historiographical approach and tackle the various commemorative works from the point of view of such questions as continuitydiscontinuity of the Ancien Régime in the Netherlands/Belgium 1813-1831, the national history writing about this period in the Netherlands and Belgium and the situation in the colonies, something often forgotten. Tom Verschaffel succesfully reviews three royal biographies within a single framework and points out the similarities and differences between the three. The perceptive analyses of all these monumental works to which the occasion has given rise appear to accord well with other royal material, which indicates that this is a vigorous field of research. Frans Willem Lantink demonstrates this in his dissection of the usual genres dealing with the subject. Susie Protschky extends the area of royalty research to the Netherlands-Indies. She makes clear the role played by photographs in establishing the ‘imagined community’ of royalists who were faithful to the Dutch fatherland and Queen Wilhelmina. In the discussion dossier on historical reasoning Dick de Boer, Peter Henderikx, Roos van Oosten and Erik Cordfunke and George Maat discuss the importance of innovative methods borrowed from physics and technology, in trying to solve tricky historical questions, but even this debate has a royal tinge. The protagonist, or perhaps it would be better to speak of the subject because it is about his remains, is the Dutch Count William II, elected as the King ofthe Romans in 1247. The editors hope you will royally enjoy reading this new number.https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/6387HistoryLow CountriesNetherlandsBelgium
spellingShingle Catrien Santing
From the Editors – Redactioneel
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
History
Low Countries
Netherlands
Belgium
title From the Editors – Redactioneel
title_full From the Editors – Redactioneel
title_fullStr From the Editors – Redactioneel
title_full_unstemmed From the Editors – Redactioneel
title_short From the Editors – Redactioneel
title_sort from the editors redactioneel
topic History
Low Countries
Netherlands
Belgium
url https://ojs.minions.amsterdam/article/view/6387
work_keys_str_mv AT catriensanting fromtheeditorsredactioneel