Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa

In this study, we investigated the impact of institutional quality on private and public investments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a sample of forty-one (41) countries between 2002–2021 using a system GMM. Using seven proxies of institutional variables, the results showed that all the institutio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Gbanja Abdulai, Yazidu Ustarz, Daniel Chris Boakye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2024-02-01
Series:Quantitative Finance and Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/QFE.2024005?viewType=HTML
_version_ 1797202199173922816
author Mohammed Gbanja Abdulai
Yazidu Ustarz
Daniel Chris Boakye
author_facet Mohammed Gbanja Abdulai
Yazidu Ustarz
Daniel Chris Boakye
author_sort Mohammed Gbanja Abdulai
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we investigated the impact of institutional quality on private and public investments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a sample of forty-one (41) countries between 2002–2021 using a system GMM. Using seven proxies of institutional variables, the results showed that all the institutional proxies had a positive and significant effect on private investment and a negative effect on public investment. We argued that higher institutional quality reduced the costs of doing business, increased investor confidence in the economy, and that property rights enforcement and the legal system increased the attractiveness of private investment in the region. Conversely, for public investment, we argued that better institutional quality exposed the inefficiency of the sector as they were mostly used for rent-seeking and perpetrate corruption, and as such reduced public investment. The results were also robust to different measures of institutions and governance indicators. We recommended that SSA governments improve project oversight and accountability, reduce corruption, promote transparency and citizen participation, strengthen anti-corruption measures, and invest in infrastructure through public-private partnerships in order to improve efficiency in the public sector. Also, governments must ensure lower lending rates, improve the efficiency of credit markets, and ensure better institutional indicators in order to increase private investment.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:59:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a981068eb6444b23be829d9f1a12b1be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2573-0134
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:59:38Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher AIMS Press
record_format Article
series Quantitative Finance and Economics
spelling doaj.art-a981068eb6444b23be829d9f1a12b1be2024-04-18T01:46:04ZengAIMS PressQuantitative Finance and Economics2573-01342024-02-018110312510.3934/QFE.2024005Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara AfricaMohammed Gbanja Abdulai0Yazidu Ustarz1Daniel Chris Boakye 21. Department of Economic Studies, School of Economics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana2. Department of Finance, School of Business, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana1. Department of Economic Studies, School of Economics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaIn this study, we investigated the impact of institutional quality on private and public investments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a sample of forty-one (41) countries between 2002–2021 using a system GMM. Using seven proxies of institutional variables, the results showed that all the institutional proxies had a positive and significant effect on private investment and a negative effect on public investment. We argued that higher institutional quality reduced the costs of doing business, increased investor confidence in the economy, and that property rights enforcement and the legal system increased the attractiveness of private investment in the region. Conversely, for public investment, we argued that better institutional quality exposed the inefficiency of the sector as they were mostly used for rent-seeking and perpetrate corruption, and as such reduced public investment. The results were also robust to different measures of institutions and governance indicators. We recommended that SSA governments improve project oversight and accountability, reduce corruption, promote transparency and citizen participation, strengthen anti-corruption measures, and invest in infrastructure through public-private partnerships in order to improve efficiency in the public sector. Also, governments must ensure lower lending rates, improve the efficiency of credit markets, and ensure better institutional indicators in order to increase private investment.https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/QFE.2024005?viewType=HTMLinvestmentgovernanceinstitutionsproperty rightssub-sahara africagmm
spellingShingle Mohammed Gbanja Abdulai
Yazidu Ustarz
Daniel Chris Boakye
Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
Quantitative Finance and Economics
investment
governance
institutions
property rights
sub-sahara africa
gmm
title Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
title_full Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
title_fullStr Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
title_full_unstemmed Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
title_short Effect of governance on investment: Evidence from Sub-Sahara Africa
title_sort effect of governance on investment evidence from sub sahara africa
topic investment
governance
institutions
property rights
sub-sahara africa
gmm
url https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/QFE.2024005?viewType=HTML
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedgbanjaabdulai effectofgovernanceoninvestmentevidencefromsubsaharaafrica
AT yaziduustarz effectofgovernanceoninvestmentevidencefromsubsaharaafrica
AT danielchrisboakye effectofgovernanceoninvestmentevidencefromsubsaharaafrica