Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid

Introduction: Evaluation of university faculty members which is aimed to improve teaching quality is performed through several methods. One of the most common and conflicting methods is faculty evaluation by students. This method is commonly used in most universities in spite of controversy over its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hossein Dargahi, Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center 2013-04-01
Series:مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2213-en.pdf
_version_ 1827771902729388032
author Hossein Dargahi
Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
author_facet Hossein Dargahi
Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
author_sort Hossein Dargahi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Evaluation of university faculty members which is aimed to improve teaching quality is performed through several methods. One of the most common and conflicting methods is faculty evaluation by students. This method is commonly used in most universities in spite of controversy over its validity. This paper presents a glance at the current research literature on the viewpoints of faculty members toward their evaluation by students. Methods: This study is a literature review performed using library studies and electronic databases. First, 64 articles in the area of faculty member evaluation were studied. Out of these articles, 42 ones were selected which met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria encompassed articles related to teacher evaluation, faculty members, and students’ viewpoints toward teaching approaches of faculties, teachers’ characteristics, classroom management, teachers’ communication skills and their relationship with students. Using the keywords of evaluation, student, faculty member, and university, we searched in journals such as Iranian Journal of Medical Education, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Knowledge and Research in Education, and other specialized journals in medical education area. Using scientific search engines such as Iran Medex, Magiran, SID, PubMed, Google Scholar, ISC, Medline, and Scopus the articles published or indexed between 1991 and 2010 were retrieved. Other papers which evaluated teachers and faculty members from other aspects or via other viewpoints were excluded. Results: The results were presented in three parts as “proponent to faculty evaluation by students”, “opponent”, and “teaching conditions affecting teacher evaluation by students”. The results showed that evaluation of teaching process must consider six aspects of content, students’ learning, classroom behavior, curriculum and materials, knowledge of faculty member, student characteristics (including material, students with high or low background, and postgraduate students), self-evaluation by the faculty member, evaluation by colleagues, educational administrators, and educational consultants and it must be compatible to organizational goals. Conclusion: The viewpoints of most faculty members of national universities and other countries states that they basically consider evaluation by their students as a valuable and reliable source of information for feedback to teachers in order to improve the quality of education. But, they believe that interventional factors should be identified and considered in this method. They also believed that teacher evaluation by students should be a part of comprehensive evaluation system of faculty members. But if the evaluation results are going to be utilized in commendation and promotion of faculty members, it would be better to employ other evaluation methods comprehensively.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T13:00:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9846ef35a794f3bafb4c1b532fba265
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1608-9359
1735-8892
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-11T13:00:48Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center
record_format Article
series مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
spelling doaj.art-a9846ef35a794f3bafb4c1b532fba2652023-11-03T16:40:56ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Centerمجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی1608-93591735-88922013-04-011313948Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or InvalidHossein Dargahi0Niloofar Mohammadzadeh1 Introduction: Evaluation of university faculty members which is aimed to improve teaching quality is performed through several methods. One of the most common and conflicting methods is faculty evaluation by students. This method is commonly used in most universities in spite of controversy over its validity. This paper presents a glance at the current research literature on the viewpoints of faculty members toward their evaluation by students. Methods: This study is a literature review performed using library studies and electronic databases. First, 64 articles in the area of faculty member evaluation were studied. Out of these articles, 42 ones were selected which met the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria encompassed articles related to teacher evaluation, faculty members, and students’ viewpoints toward teaching approaches of faculties, teachers’ characteristics, classroom management, teachers’ communication skills and their relationship with students. Using the keywords of evaluation, student, faculty member, and university, we searched in journals such as Iranian Journal of Medical Education, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Knowledge and Research in Education, and other specialized journals in medical education area. Using scientific search engines such as Iran Medex, Magiran, SID, PubMed, Google Scholar, ISC, Medline, and Scopus the articles published or indexed between 1991 and 2010 were retrieved. Other papers which evaluated teachers and faculty members from other aspects or via other viewpoints were excluded. Results: The results were presented in three parts as “proponent to faculty evaluation by students”, “opponent”, and “teaching conditions affecting teacher evaluation by students”. The results showed that evaluation of teaching process must consider six aspects of content, students’ learning, classroom behavior, curriculum and materials, knowledge of faculty member, student characteristics (including material, students with high or low background, and postgraduate students), self-evaluation by the faculty member, evaluation by colleagues, educational administrators, and educational consultants and it must be compatible to organizational goals. Conclusion: The viewpoints of most faculty members of national universities and other countries states that they basically consider evaluation by their students as a valuable and reliable source of information for feedback to teachers in order to improve the quality of education. But, they believe that interventional factors should be identified and considered in this method. They also believed that teacher evaluation by students should be a part of comprehensive evaluation system of faculty members. But if the evaluation results are going to be utilized in commendation and promotion of faculty members, it would be better to employ other evaluation methods comprehensively.http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2213-en.pdfevaluationfaculty membersstudentuniversity.
spellingShingle Hossein Dargahi
Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی
evaluation
faculty members
student
university.
title Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
title_full Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
title_fullStr Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
title_short Faculty Members’ Evaluation by Students: Valid or Invalid
title_sort faculty members evaluation by students valid or invalid
topic evaluation
faculty members
student
university.
url http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2213-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseindargahi facultymembersevaluationbystudentsvalidorinvalid
AT niloofarmohammadzadeh facultymembersevaluationbystudentsvalidorinvalid