Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to conventional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) therapy to reduce lead complications. Objective: To evaluate outcomes in channelopathy vs patients with structural heart disease in the EFFORTLESS-SICD Registry and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS, Lars Eckardt, MD, Dominic A. Theuns, PhD, Timothy R. Betts, MD, Andreas L. Kyriacou, MBChB, FRCP, PhD, CCDS, Elizabeth Duffy, MS, Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, CCDS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Heart Rhythm O2
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301434
_version_ 1819028461626327040
author Pier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS
Lars Eckardt, MD
Dominic A. Theuns, PhD
Timothy R. Betts, MD
Andreas L. Kyriacou, MBChB, FRCP, PhD, CCDS
Elizabeth Duffy, MS
Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, CCDS
author_facet Pier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS
Lars Eckardt, MD
Dominic A. Theuns, PhD
Timothy R. Betts, MD
Andreas L. Kyriacou, MBChB, FRCP, PhD, CCDS
Elizabeth Duffy, MS
Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, CCDS
author_sort Pier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS
collection DOAJ
description Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to conventional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) therapy to reduce lead complications. Objective: To evaluate outcomes in channelopathy vs patients with structural heart disease in the EFFORTLESS-SICD Registry and with a previously reported TV-ICD meta-analysis in channnelopathies. Methods: The EFFORTLESS registry includes 199 patients with channelopathies (Brugada syndrome 83, long QT syndrome 24, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation 78, others 14) and 786 patients with structural heart disease. Results: Channelopathy patients were younger (39 ± 14 years vs 51 ± 17 years; P < .001) with left ventricular ejection fraction 59% ± 9% vs 41% ± 18% (P < .001). The complication rate (follow-up: 3.2 ± 1.5 years vs 3.0 ± 1.5 years) was similar: 13.6% vs 11.2% (P = .42). Appropriate shocks rates were 9.5% vs 10.8% (P = .70), with shocks for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia being 2.0% vs 6.9% (P < .02) and for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) 8.0% vs 5.7% (P = .30). Conversion effectiveness of VT/VF episodes was similar: 36 of 37 (97.3%) vs 151 of 155 (97.4%, P = .59). VT/VF storm event (2% vs 0.9%, P = .33) and lower inappropriate shock (IAS) (8.5% vs 12.5%, P = .12) rates were statistically similar between channelopathy and non-channelopathy patients, with 45.5% channelopathy vs 31.4% non-channelopathy patients managed with a conditional zone > 200 beats per minute (P = .0002). Annualized appropriate shock, IAS, and complication rates appear to be lower for the S-ICD vs meta-analysis TV-ICD patients, particularly lead complications. Conclusion: EFFORTLESS demonstrates similar S-ICD efficacy and a nonsignificant, lower rate of IAS in channelopathy patients as compared to structural heart disease. Comparable IAS rates were achieved with the device programmed to higher rates for channelopathy patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:58:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9c8ef274f614046b43c94999f3c908f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5018
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:58:44Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heart Rhythm O2
spelling doaj.art-a9c8ef274f614046b43c94999f3c908f2022-12-21T19:13:48ZengElsevierHeart Rhythm O22666-50182020-12-0115326335Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomesPier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS0Lars Eckardt, MD1Dominic A. Theuns, PhD2Timothy R. Betts, MD3Andreas L. Kyriacou, MBChB, FRCP, PhD, CCDS4Elizabeth Duffy, MS5Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, CCDS6Barts Heart Centre, London, Edgware, United Kingdom; Address reprint requests and correspondence: Prof Pier D. Lambiase, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, UCL, Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.Department of Cardiology II, University Hospital, Muenster, GermanyErasmus MC, Rotterdam, NetherlandsOxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United KingdomSheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United KingdomBoston Scientific, St Paul, MinnesotaAcademic Medical Center, Amsterdam, NetherlandsBackground: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to conventional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) therapy to reduce lead complications. Objective: To evaluate outcomes in channelopathy vs patients with structural heart disease in the EFFORTLESS-SICD Registry and with a previously reported TV-ICD meta-analysis in channnelopathies. Methods: The EFFORTLESS registry includes 199 patients with channelopathies (Brugada syndrome 83, long QT syndrome 24, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation 78, others 14) and 786 patients with structural heart disease. Results: Channelopathy patients were younger (39 ± 14 years vs 51 ± 17 years; P < .001) with left ventricular ejection fraction 59% ± 9% vs 41% ± 18% (P < .001). The complication rate (follow-up: 3.2 ± 1.5 years vs 3.0 ± 1.5 years) was similar: 13.6% vs 11.2% (P = .42). Appropriate shocks rates were 9.5% vs 10.8% (P = .70), with shocks for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia being 2.0% vs 6.9% (P < .02) and for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) 8.0% vs 5.7% (P = .30). Conversion effectiveness of VT/VF episodes was similar: 36 of 37 (97.3%) vs 151 of 155 (97.4%, P = .59). VT/VF storm event (2% vs 0.9%, P = .33) and lower inappropriate shock (IAS) (8.5% vs 12.5%, P = .12) rates were statistically similar between channelopathy and non-channelopathy patients, with 45.5% channelopathy vs 31.4% non-channelopathy patients managed with a conditional zone > 200 beats per minute (P = .0002). Annualized appropriate shock, IAS, and complication rates appear to be lower for the S-ICD vs meta-analysis TV-ICD patients, particularly lead complications. Conclusion: EFFORTLESS demonstrates similar S-ICD efficacy and a nonsignificant, lower rate of IAS in channelopathy patients as compared to structural heart disease. Comparable IAS rates were achieved with the device programmed to higher rates for channelopathy patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301434ArrhythmiaChannelopathyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorSudden cardiac deathSubcutaneous ICDVentricular arrhythmias
spellingShingle Pier D. Lambiase, MBChB, PhD, FHRS
Lars Eckardt, MD
Dominic A. Theuns, PhD
Timothy R. Betts, MD
Andreas L. Kyriacou, MBChB, FRCP, PhD, CCDS
Elizabeth Duffy, MS
Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, CCDS
Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
Heart Rhythm O2
Arrhythmia
Channelopathy
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Sudden cardiac death
Subcutaneous ICD
Ventricular arrhythmias
title Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
title_full Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
title_fullStr Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
title_short Evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the EFFORTLESS cohort and comparison with a meta-analysis of transvenous ICD outcomes
title_sort evaluation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator performance in patients with ion channelopathies from the effortless cohort and comparison with a meta analysis of transvenous icd outcomes
topic Arrhythmia
Channelopathy
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Sudden cardiac death
Subcutaneous ICD
Ventricular arrhythmias
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501820301434
work_keys_str_mv AT pierdlambiasembchbphdfhrs evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT larseckardtmd evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT dominicatheunsphd evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT timothyrbettsmd evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT andreaslkyriacoumbchbfrcpphdccds evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT elizabethduffyms evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes
AT reinoudknopsmdphdccds evaluationofsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorperformanceinpatientswithionchannelopathiesfromtheeffortlesscohortandcomparisonwithametaanalysisoftransvenousicdoutcomes