Liberal autonomy in a troubled context

Autonomy, understood as self-rule, is almost routinely accepted as one of the core liberal concepts. Still, a closer view reveals that both the status and meaning of autonomy are controversial. The text departs from a short summary of the main theoretical disputes surrounding the concept. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dimitrijević Nenad
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2017-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2017/0353-57381701090D.pdf
_version_ 1818445471014715392
author Dimitrijević Nenad
author_facet Dimitrijević Nenad
author_sort Dimitrijević Nenad
collection DOAJ
description Autonomy, understood as self-rule, is almost routinely accepted as one of the core liberal concepts. Still, a closer view reveals that both the status and meaning of autonomy are controversial. The text departs from a short summary of the main theoretical disputes surrounding the concept. A critique of the standard internalist account is followed by an attempt to offer reasons for accepting a relational reading of autonomy. The central question of the text is context-specific. It asks about the possibility and meaning of liberal autonomy in a society whose past is marked by mass regime-sponsored (and sometimes widely supported) crimes. The background assumption is that mass crime leaves actors in heteronomous condition. At stake is reestablishing individual autonomies of two types of actors, whose group-specific identities have been created by crime: the ethical community of those who share collective identity with victims, and the ethical community of those who share collective identity with perpetrators.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T19:32:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9d58d1529a2419abb5c114e51d37c78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-5738
2334-8577
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-14T19:32:21Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Filozofija i Društvo
spelling doaj.art-a9d58d1529a2419abb5c114e51d37c782022-12-21T22:50:02ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772017-01-012819010910.2298/FID1701090D0353-57381701090DLiberal autonomy in a troubled contextDimitrijević Nenad0Central European University, Political Science Department, Budapest, HungaryAutonomy, understood as self-rule, is almost routinely accepted as one of the core liberal concepts. Still, a closer view reveals that both the status and meaning of autonomy are controversial. The text departs from a short summary of the main theoretical disputes surrounding the concept. A critique of the standard internalist account is followed by an attempt to offer reasons for accepting a relational reading of autonomy. The central question of the text is context-specific. It asks about the possibility and meaning of liberal autonomy in a society whose past is marked by mass regime-sponsored (and sometimes widely supported) crimes. The background assumption is that mass crime leaves actors in heteronomous condition. At stake is reestablishing individual autonomies of two types of actors, whose group-specific identities have been created by crime: the ethical community of those who share collective identity with victims, and the ethical community of those who share collective identity with perpetrators.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2017/0353-57381701090D.pdfautonomyharmmoralityethicsspecial dutiesmemoryacknowledgment
spellingShingle Dimitrijević Nenad
Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
Filozofija i Društvo
autonomy
harm
morality
ethics
special duties
memory
acknowledgment
title Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
title_full Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
title_fullStr Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
title_full_unstemmed Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
title_short Liberal autonomy in a troubled context
title_sort liberal autonomy in a troubled context
topic autonomy
harm
morality
ethics
special duties
memory
acknowledgment
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2017/0353-57381701090D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrijevicnenad liberalautonomyinatroubledcontext