Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography

Despite numerous papers addressing the topic, the gross morphology of the ratite tongue and more specifically that of the emu, has been superficially or poorly described. This paper presents the first definitive macroscopic description of the emu tongue and reviews, consolidates and compares the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.R. Crole, J.T. Soley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2009-09-01
Series:Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
Online Access:https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/39
_version_ 1811303320873074688
author M.R. Crole
J.T. Soley
author_facet M.R. Crole
J.T. Soley
author_sort M.R. Crole
collection DOAJ
description Despite numerous papers addressing the topic, the gross morphology of the ratite tongue and more specifically that of the emu, has been superficially or poorly described. This paper presents the first definitive macroscopic description of the emu tongue and reviews, consolidates and compares the scattered information on the gross morphology of the ratite tongue available in the literature. Twenty-three heads obtained from birds at slaughter were used for this study. Specimens were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin, rinsed and the gross anatomy described. The emu tongue is divided into a body and a root. The body is triangular, dorsoventrally flattened, pigmented and displays caudally directed lingual papillae on both the lateral and caudal margins. The root, a more conspicuous structure in comparison to other ratites, is triangular, with a raised bulbous component folding over the rostral part of the laryngeal fissure. Following the general trend in ratites, the emu tongue is greatly reduced in comparison to the bill length and is specifically adapted for swallowing during the cranioinertial method of feeding employed by palaeognaths. This study revealed that it is not only the shape of the tongue that differs between ratites, as previously reported, but also its colour, appearance of its margins and root, and its length in comparison to the bill, and the shape of the paraglossum.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:44:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9d74efbcf9440589ec8e4e99a715b8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-2465
2219-0635
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:44:56Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-a9d74efbcf9440589ec8e4e99a715b8d2022-12-22T02:55:43ZengAOSISOnderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research0030-24652219-06352009-09-0176333534510.4102/ojvr.v76i3.3930Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topographyM.R. CroleJ.T. SoleyDespite numerous papers addressing the topic, the gross morphology of the ratite tongue and more specifically that of the emu, has been superficially or poorly described. This paper presents the first definitive macroscopic description of the emu tongue and reviews, consolidates and compares the scattered information on the gross morphology of the ratite tongue available in the literature. Twenty-three heads obtained from birds at slaughter were used for this study. Specimens were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin, rinsed and the gross anatomy described. The emu tongue is divided into a body and a root. The body is triangular, dorsoventrally flattened, pigmented and displays caudally directed lingual papillae on both the lateral and caudal margins. The root, a more conspicuous structure in comparison to other ratites, is triangular, with a raised bulbous component folding over the rostral part of the laryngeal fissure. Following the general trend in ratites, the emu tongue is greatly reduced in comparison to the bill length and is specifically adapted for swallowing during the cranioinertial method of feeding employed by palaeognaths. This study revealed that it is not only the shape of the tongue that differs between ratites, as previously reported, but also its colour, appearance of its margins and root, and its length in comparison to the bill, and the shape of the paraglossum.https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/39
spellingShingle M.R. Crole
J.T. Soley
Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research
title Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
title_full Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
title_fullStr Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
title_full_unstemmed Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
title_short Morphology of the tongue of the emu (<i>Dromaius novaehollandiae</i>). I. Gross anatomical features and topography
title_sort morphology of the tongue of the emu i dromaius novaehollandiae i i gross anatomical features and topography
url https://ojvr.org/index.php/ojvr/article/view/39
work_keys_str_mv AT mrcrole morphologyofthetongueoftheemuidromaiusnovaehollandiaeiigrossanatomicalfeaturesandtopography
AT jtsoley morphologyofthetongueoftheemuidromaiusnovaehollandiaeiigrossanatomicalfeaturesandtopography