Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism

Abstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or Biocontrol strains inevitably encounter heavy metal excess stress during the product’s processing and application. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 was a potential biocontrol strain with strong heavy metal resistant ability. To understand its he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuanchan Luo, Lei Chen, Zhibo Lu, Weijian Zhang, Wentong Liu, Yuwei Chen, Xinran Wang, Wei Du, Jinyan Luo, Hui Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-07-01
Series:Bioresources and Bioprocessing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00563-x
_version_ 1818192982058205184
author Yuanchan Luo
Lei Chen
Zhibo Lu
Weijian Zhang
Wentong Liu
Yuwei Chen
Xinran Wang
Wei Du
Jinyan Luo
Hui Wu
author_facet Yuanchan Luo
Lei Chen
Zhibo Lu
Weijian Zhang
Wentong Liu
Yuwei Chen
Xinran Wang
Wei Du
Jinyan Luo
Hui Wu
author_sort Yuanchan Luo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or Biocontrol strains inevitably encounter heavy metal excess stress during the product’s processing and application. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 was a potential biocontrol strain with strong heavy metal resistant ability. To understand its heavy metal resistance mechanism, the complete genome of Bam1 had been sequenced, and the comparative genomic analysis of Bam1 and FZB42, an industrialized PGPR and biocontrol strain with relatively lower heavy metal tolerance, was conducted. The comparative genomic analysis of Bam1 and the other nine B. amyloliquefaciens strains as well as one Bacillus velezensis (genetically and physiologically very close to B. amyloliquefaciens) was also performed. Our results showed that the complete genome size of Bam1 was 3.95 Mb, 4219 coding sequences were predicted, and it possessed the highest number of unique genes among the eleven analyzed strains. Nine genes related to heavy metal resistance were detected within the twelve DNA islands of Bam1, while only two of them were detected within the seventeen DNA islands of FZB42. When compared with B. amyloliquefaciens type strain DSM7, Bam1 lacked contig L, whereas FZB42 lacked contig D and I, as well as just possessed contig B with a very small size. Our results could also deduce that Bam1 promoted its essential heavy metal resistance mainly by decreasing the import and increasing the export of heavy metals with the corresponding homeostasis systems, which are regulated by different metalloregulators. While Bam1 promoted its non-essential heavy metal resistance mainly by the activation of some specific or non-specific exporters responding to different heavy metals. The variation of the genes related to heavy metal resistance and the other differences of the genomes, including the different number and arrangement of contigs, as well as the number of the heavy metal resistant genes in Prophages and Genomic islands, led to the significant different resistance of Bam1 and FZB42 to heavy metals. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a9f2d0c83ddc4426a28b46d768d6f2f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-4365
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:39:09Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Bioresources and Bioprocessing
spelling doaj.art-a9f2d0c83ddc4426a28b46d768d6f2f82022-12-22T00:44:18ZengSpringerOpenBioresources and Bioprocessing2197-43652022-07-019112310.1186/s40643-022-00563-xGenome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanismYuanchan Luo0Lei Chen1Zhibo Lu2Weijian Zhang3Wentong Liu4Yuwei Chen5Xinran Wang6Wei Du7Jinyan Luo8Hui Wu9Department of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Plant Quarantine, Shanghai Extension and Service Center of Agriculture TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyAgricultural Technology Extension Station of NingxiaDepartment of Plant Quarantine, Shanghai Extension and Service Center of Agriculture TechnologyDepartment of Applied Biology, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or Biocontrol strains inevitably encounter heavy metal excess stress during the product’s processing and application. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 was a potential biocontrol strain with strong heavy metal resistant ability. To understand its heavy metal resistance mechanism, the complete genome of Bam1 had been sequenced, and the comparative genomic analysis of Bam1 and FZB42, an industrialized PGPR and biocontrol strain with relatively lower heavy metal tolerance, was conducted. The comparative genomic analysis of Bam1 and the other nine B. amyloliquefaciens strains as well as one Bacillus velezensis (genetically and physiologically very close to B. amyloliquefaciens) was also performed. Our results showed that the complete genome size of Bam1 was 3.95 Mb, 4219 coding sequences were predicted, and it possessed the highest number of unique genes among the eleven analyzed strains. Nine genes related to heavy metal resistance were detected within the twelve DNA islands of Bam1, while only two of them were detected within the seventeen DNA islands of FZB42. When compared with B. amyloliquefaciens type strain DSM7, Bam1 lacked contig L, whereas FZB42 lacked contig D and I, as well as just possessed contig B with a very small size. Our results could also deduce that Bam1 promoted its essential heavy metal resistance mainly by decreasing the import and increasing the export of heavy metals with the corresponding homeostasis systems, which are regulated by different metalloregulators. While Bam1 promoted its non-essential heavy metal resistance mainly by the activation of some specific or non-specific exporters responding to different heavy metals. The variation of the genes related to heavy metal resistance and the other differences of the genomes, including the different number and arrangement of contigs, as well as the number of the heavy metal resistant genes in Prophages and Genomic islands, led to the significant different resistance of Bam1 and FZB42 to heavy metals. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00563-xBacillus amyloliquefaciensHeavy metal resistance mechanismComparative genomic analysisResistance to essential heavy metalsResistance to non-essential heavy metals
spellingShingle Yuanchan Luo
Lei Chen
Zhibo Lu
Weijian Zhang
Wentong Liu
Yuwei Chen
Xinran Wang
Wei Du
Jinyan Luo
Hui Wu
Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
Bioresources and Bioprocessing
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Heavy metal resistance mechanism
Comparative genomic analysis
Resistance to essential heavy metals
Resistance to non-essential heavy metals
title Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
title_full Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
title_fullStr Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
title_full_unstemmed Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
title_short Genome sequencing of biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
title_sort genome sequencing of biocontrol strain bacillus amyloliquefaciens bam1 and further analysis of its heavy metal resistance mechanism
topic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Heavy metal resistance mechanism
Comparative genomic analysis
Resistance to essential heavy metals
Resistance to non-essential heavy metals
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-022-00563-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanchanluo genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT leichen genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT zhibolu genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT weijianzhang genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT wentongliu genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT yuweichen genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT xinranwang genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT weidu genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT jinyanluo genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism
AT huiwu genomesequencingofbiocontrolstrainbacillusamyloliquefaciensbam1andfurtheranalysisofitsheavymetalresistancemechanism