| Summary: | Background. The solution of the tasks of import substitution and import advance
within the framework of the National Project «Science and Universities» is tied to the
implementation of development programs for universities participating in the program of
strategic academic leadership «Priority 2030». To ensure the effectiveness of university development
programs, adequate models for the implementation of the policies presented in
them are needed. The aim of the study is to develop theoretical and methodological approaches
to the formation of models for implementing the innovation policy of the universities
of the Volga Federal District, which are participants in the «Priority 2030» program.
Materials and methods. The solution of the research tasks is based on the analysis of the
effectiveness of the models for implementing the innovation policy of the universities of the
district, which received state support both in the form of a special part of the grant, and in the
form of only the basic part of the grant. To do this, we used data from monitoring the effectiveness
of universities in 2019–2021, given by the National University Ranking 2019–2022,
given by the Inventive Activity Index of Russian Universities 2022. Together with a benchmarking
analysis, a comparative analysis of university development programs was used in
terms of the implementation of scientific and research policy and policy in the field of innovation
and commercialization of developments. Results. Based on the results of the analysis,
a period of smooth evolutionary development of innovation management systems was found
in 58 % of the studied universities with different rates of deployment of new innovation management
mechanisms. An analysis of university development programs for the period up to
2030 showed the dominance of the project approach and the presence of a trend towards the
deployment of an ecosystem approach in innovation management. Conclusions. It is advisable
to expand the possibilities of innovation policy implementation models through the use
of lean production tools, product approach, etc. The conducted research does not pretend to
be a complete picture of the entire group of universities included in the «Priority 2030» Program,
since it covers only a part of its participants. The article is of interest to researchers of
the higher education system in the context of the diversification of mechanisms for increasing
the efficiency of activities.
|
|---|