Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment

Abstract Background The anchoring effect refers to the tendency that an individual’s numerical judgment would assimilate to an anchor (a numerical value) that appears before that judgment. This study investigated whether the anchoring effect exists in the emotion judgment of younger and older adults...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Menghan Jin, Huamao Peng, Dahua Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01101-w
_version_ 1827943193591676928
author Menghan Jin
Huamao Peng
Dahua Wang
author_facet Menghan Jin
Huamao Peng
Dahua Wang
author_sort Menghan Jin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The anchoring effect refers to the tendency that an individual’s numerical judgment would assimilate to an anchor (a numerical value) that appears before that judgment. This study investigated whether the anchoring effect exists in the emotion judgment of younger and older adults and observed the age-related characteristics. This could not only broaden the explanation of the anchoring effect but also link this classic judgment bias with daily emotion judgment to refresh our understanding of older adults’ ability in emotional perspective taking. Method Participants (older adults: n = 64, age range: 60–74, 27 males; younger adults: n = 68, age range: 18–34, 34 males) read a brief emotional story and compared the protagonist’s emotion intensity to a given numerical anchor (lower or higher than the anchor) and then estimated the protagonist’s possible emotion intensity in that story. The task was divided into two cases according to anchor relevance (anchors are relevant or irrelevant relative to the judgment target). Results The results showed that the estimates were higher under high-anchor than low-anchor conditions, suggesting the robust anchoring effect. Further, the anchoring effect was greater for anchor-relevant than anchor-irrelevant tasks and for negative rather than positive emotions. No age differences were found. Discussion and conclusions The results indicated that the anchoring effect is robust and stable for younger and older adults, even though the anchor information seemed irrelevant. Finally, perceiving others’ negative emotions is a crucial but rather difficult aspect of empathy, which could be a challenge and requires more caution for accurate interpretation.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:11:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa01cb6aecd144fca871bd537da7c9cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-7283
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:11:46Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj.art-aa01cb6aecd144fca871bd537da7c9cd2023-05-21T11:30:27ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832023-05-0111111410.1186/s40359-023-01101-wAge similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgmentMenghan Jin0Huamao Peng1Dahua Wang2Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal UniversityInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal UniversityInstitute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal UniversityAbstract Background The anchoring effect refers to the tendency that an individual’s numerical judgment would assimilate to an anchor (a numerical value) that appears before that judgment. This study investigated whether the anchoring effect exists in the emotion judgment of younger and older adults and observed the age-related characteristics. This could not only broaden the explanation of the anchoring effect but also link this classic judgment bias with daily emotion judgment to refresh our understanding of older adults’ ability in emotional perspective taking. Method Participants (older adults: n = 64, age range: 60–74, 27 males; younger adults: n = 68, age range: 18–34, 34 males) read a brief emotional story and compared the protagonist’s emotion intensity to a given numerical anchor (lower or higher than the anchor) and then estimated the protagonist’s possible emotion intensity in that story. The task was divided into two cases according to anchor relevance (anchors are relevant or irrelevant relative to the judgment target). Results The results showed that the estimates were higher under high-anchor than low-anchor conditions, suggesting the robust anchoring effect. Further, the anchoring effect was greater for anchor-relevant than anchor-irrelevant tasks and for negative rather than positive emotions. No age differences were found. Discussion and conclusions The results indicated that the anchoring effect is robust and stable for younger and older adults, even though the anchor information seemed irrelevant. Finally, perceiving others’ negative emotions is a crucial but rather difficult aspect of empathy, which could be a challenge and requires more caution for accurate interpretation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01101-wAge SimilarityAnchoring EffectEmotional JudgmentJudgment Bias
spellingShingle Menghan Jin
Huamao Peng
Dahua Wang
Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
BMC Psychology
Age Similarity
Anchoring Effect
Emotional Judgment
Judgment Bias
title Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
title_full Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
title_fullStr Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
title_full_unstemmed Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
title_short Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
title_sort age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment
topic Age Similarity
Anchoring Effect
Emotional Judgment
Judgment Bias
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01101-w
work_keys_str_mv AT menghanjin agesimilaritiesintheanchoringeffectinemotionintensityjudgment
AT huamaopeng agesimilaritiesintheanchoringeffectinemotionintensityjudgment
AT dahuawang agesimilaritiesintheanchoringeffectinemotionintensityjudgment