Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake

Abstract Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a useful tool for detecting surface deformations at high spatial resolutions. When InSAR is applied to large surface deformations, clear fringes with complicated phase gaps often appear in the interferograms. Although the surface deformati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taku Ozawa, Yuji Himematsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-05-01
Series:Earth, Planets and Space
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01635-0
_version_ 1818238943896797184
author Taku Ozawa
Yuji Himematsu
author_facet Taku Ozawa
Yuji Himematsu
author_sort Taku Ozawa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a useful tool for detecting surface deformations at high spatial resolutions. When InSAR is applied to large surface deformations, clear fringes with complicated phase gaps often appear in the interferograms. Although the surface deformations in such areas provide valuable data for earthquake research and disaster investigation, it is difficult to convert the complicated interferometric phase to surface deformation information because of the difficulties associated with phase unwrapping. To resolve these difficulties, we created multiple SAR pairs with different frequencies using a bandpass filter and calculated the difference between the interferograms generated from these SAR pairs (referred to as the DSI analysis in this study). Generally, the obtained difference corresponds to SAR observations using long-wavelength radar. Therefore, phase wrap is less likely to occur, simplifying phase unwrapping. We applied the DSI analysis to PALSAR-2 data pairs for the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and successfully identified large crustal deformations with complicated phase gaps in the vicinity of the surface ruptures. Comparing these results with the crustal deformations observed with global navigation satellite system measurements, the root-mean-squares of the differences were found to be approximately 4 cm. Although this accuracy was lower than that of conventional InSAR, it was nearly equivalent to that of offset-tracking analysis. It should be noted that the spatial resolution of the DSI analysis was significantly improved compared to that of offset-tracking analysis. A disadvantage of this method is that its detection accuracy is significantly degraded in zones with low coherence owing to noise amplification. The standard deviation of the noise component was approximately 2 cm for pixels with coherence > 0.7. However, for pixels with a coherence < 0.2, the standard deviation was > 10 cm, and the noise component occasionally exceeded 1 m. Despite its disadvantages, this method is effective for detecting large crustal deformations with high spatial resolution in areas where conventional InSAR processing is inappropriate. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-12-12T12:49:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa1bc627d8bb496da8c410fcf7800f73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-5981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T12:49:41Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Earth, Planets and Space
spelling doaj.art-aa1bc627d8bb496da8c410fcf7800f732022-12-22T00:24:01ZengSpringerOpenEarth, Planets and Space1880-59812022-05-0174111110.1186/s40623-022-01635-0Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto EarthquakeTaku Ozawa0Yuji Himematsu1National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster ResilienceNational Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster ResilienceAbstract Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a useful tool for detecting surface deformations at high spatial resolutions. When InSAR is applied to large surface deformations, clear fringes with complicated phase gaps often appear in the interferograms. Although the surface deformations in such areas provide valuable data for earthquake research and disaster investigation, it is difficult to convert the complicated interferometric phase to surface deformation information because of the difficulties associated with phase unwrapping. To resolve these difficulties, we created multiple SAR pairs with different frequencies using a bandpass filter and calculated the difference between the interferograms generated from these SAR pairs (referred to as the DSI analysis in this study). Generally, the obtained difference corresponds to SAR observations using long-wavelength radar. Therefore, phase wrap is less likely to occur, simplifying phase unwrapping. We applied the DSI analysis to PALSAR-2 data pairs for the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and successfully identified large crustal deformations with complicated phase gaps in the vicinity of the surface ruptures. Comparing these results with the crustal deformations observed with global navigation satellite system measurements, the root-mean-squares of the differences were found to be approximately 4 cm. Although this accuracy was lower than that of conventional InSAR, it was nearly equivalent to that of offset-tracking analysis. It should be noted that the spatial resolution of the DSI analysis was significantly improved compared to that of offset-tracking analysis. A disadvantage of this method is that its detection accuracy is significantly degraded in zones with low coherence owing to noise amplification. The standard deviation of the noise component was approximately 2 cm for pixels with coherence > 0.7. However, for pixels with a coherence < 0.2, the standard deviation was > 10 cm, and the noise component occasionally exceeded 1 m. Despite its disadvantages, this method is effective for detecting large crustal deformations with high spatial resolution in areas where conventional InSAR processing is inappropriate. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01635-0DSIDifference of split-band interferogramsInSARCrustal deformationThe 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
spellingShingle Taku Ozawa
Yuji Himematsu
Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
Earth, Planets and Space
DSI
Difference of split-band interferograms
InSAR
Crustal deformation
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title_full Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title_fullStr Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title_full_unstemmed Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title_short Impact of crustal deformation detection by the DSI (difference of split-band interferograms) method with PALSAR-2 data: a case study on the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
title_sort impact of crustal deformation detection by the dsi difference of split band interferograms method with palsar 2 data a case study on the 2016 kumamoto earthquake
topic DSI
Difference of split-band interferograms
InSAR
Crustal deformation
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01635-0
work_keys_str_mv AT takuozawa impactofcrustaldeformationdetectionbythedsidifferenceofsplitbandinterferogramsmethodwithpalsar2dataacasestudyonthe2016kumamotoearthquake
AT yujihimematsu impactofcrustaldeformationdetectionbythedsidifferenceofsplitbandinterferogramsmethodwithpalsar2dataacasestudyonthe2016kumamotoearthquake