A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument

John Schellenberg argues that divine hiddenness is evidence against God’s existence. More precisely, according to Schellenberg’s well-known Hiddenness Argument, God’s existence entails that there would never be any nonresistant non-believers; however, there are some non-resistant non-believers; ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erasmus Jacobus, Stratton Timothy A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2023-03-01
Series:Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0003
_version_ 1827998137001705472
author Erasmus Jacobus
Stratton Timothy A.
author_facet Erasmus Jacobus
Stratton Timothy A.
author_sort Erasmus Jacobus
collection DOAJ
description John Schellenberg argues that divine hiddenness is evidence against God’s existence. More precisely, according to Schellenberg’s well-known Hiddenness Argument, God’s existence entails that there would never be any nonresistant non-believers; however, there are some non-resistant non-believers; therefore, God does not exist. In this paper, we offer a Molinist response or solution to the Hiddenness Argument. First, we briefly explain Molinism, we then describe Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument, and, finally, we argue that Molinism undercuts the view that God would necessarily ensure there will never be any nonresistant non-believers.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:40:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa1f21ec87d44071a4e73833a58e2b12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2284-7308
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:40:13Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
spelling doaj.art-aa1f21ec87d44071a4e73833a58e2b122023-03-06T10:30:09ZengSciendoPerichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University2284-73082023-03-01211395110.2478/perc-2023-0003A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness ArgumentErasmus Jacobus0Stratton Timothy A.1School of Philosophy at North-West UniversityTrinity College of the Bible and Theological SeminaryJohn Schellenberg argues that divine hiddenness is evidence against God’s existence. More precisely, according to Schellenberg’s well-known Hiddenness Argument, God’s existence entails that there would never be any nonresistant non-believers; however, there are some non-resistant non-believers; therefore, God does not exist. In this paper, we offer a Molinist response or solution to the Hiddenness Argument. First, we briefly explain Molinism, we then describe Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument, and, finally, we argue that Molinism undercuts the view that God would necessarily ensure there will never be any nonresistant non-believers.https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0003john schellenberghiddenness argumentdivine hiddennessmolinism
spellingShingle Erasmus Jacobus
Stratton Timothy A.
A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
john schellenberg
hiddenness argument
divine hiddenness
molinism
title A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
title_full A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
title_fullStr A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
title_full_unstemmed A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
title_short A Molinist Response to Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument
title_sort molinist response to schellenberg s hiddenness argument
topic john schellenberg
hiddenness argument
divine hiddenness
molinism
url https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0003
work_keys_str_mv AT erasmusjacobus amolinistresponsetoschellenbergshiddennessargument
AT strattontimothya amolinistresponsetoschellenbergshiddennessargument
AT erasmusjacobus molinistresponsetoschellenbergshiddennessargument
AT strattontimothya molinistresponsetoschellenbergshiddennessargument