Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation

Abstract Background Work stress and compassion fatigue are prevalent among healthcare staff and their negative effects on staff well-being and patient care are well-known. This paper reports on the implementation and evaluation of Schwartz Rounds® (Rounds) in UK healthcare organizations, predominant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Dawson, Imelda McCarthy, Cath Taylor, Kristin Hildenbrand, Mary Leamy, Ellie Reynolds, Jill Maben
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06413-4
_version_ 1818865949512564736
author Jeremy Dawson
Imelda McCarthy
Cath Taylor
Kristin Hildenbrand
Mary Leamy
Ellie Reynolds
Jill Maben
author_facet Jeremy Dawson
Imelda McCarthy
Cath Taylor
Kristin Hildenbrand
Mary Leamy
Ellie Reynolds
Jill Maben
author_sort Jeremy Dawson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Work stress and compassion fatigue are prevalent among healthcare staff and their negative effects on staff well-being and patient care are well-known. This paper reports on the implementation and evaluation of Schwartz Rounds® (Rounds) in UK healthcare organizations, predominantly part of the National Health Service (NHS). Rounds are one-hour, typically monthly, multidisciplinary forums during which clinical and nonclinical healthcare staff discuss the emotional and social demands of delivering patient care. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Rounds attendance on the psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection of healthcare staff. Methods We used a pre-post control design to assess the effect of Rounds attendance across 10 UK healthcare organizations. This design was most appropriate given the voluntary nature of Rounds and ensured the study had ecological validity. Self-reported data were collected from attenders and non-attenders at baseline and at eight-months follow-up. The outcomes were psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection. Results During the 8 months’ study duration, regular attenders (N = 51) attended Rounds on average 4 times (2–8). Attenders showed a significantly greater decrease in psychological distress (as measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)) than non-attenders (N = 233; odds ratio of 0.197; 95% confidence interval (0.047–0.823)). However, Rounds attendance had no significant effect on work engagement, compassion and self-reflection. Conclusions Rounds attendance was linked to a 19% reduction in psychological distress adjusting for covariates. As an organization-wide intervention, Rounds thus constitute an effective, relatively low-cost intervention to assist staff in dealing with the demands of their work and to improve their well-being.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T10:55:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa2a1194e8974b75a4f1e95c97a91676
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T10:55:41Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-aa2a1194e8974b75a4f1e95c97a916762022-12-21T20:24:49ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-04-012111910.1186/s12913-021-06413-4Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluationJeremy Dawson0Imelda McCarthy1Cath Taylor2Kristin Hildenbrand3Mary Leamy4Ellie Reynolds5Jill Maben6Sheffield University Management School, University of SheffieldAston UniversityUniversity of SurreySheffield University Management School, University of SheffieldKing’s CollegeKing’s CollegeUniversity of SurreyAbstract Background Work stress and compassion fatigue are prevalent among healthcare staff and their negative effects on staff well-being and patient care are well-known. This paper reports on the implementation and evaluation of Schwartz Rounds® (Rounds) in UK healthcare organizations, predominantly part of the National Health Service (NHS). Rounds are one-hour, typically monthly, multidisciplinary forums during which clinical and nonclinical healthcare staff discuss the emotional and social demands of delivering patient care. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Rounds attendance on the psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection of healthcare staff. Methods We used a pre-post control design to assess the effect of Rounds attendance across 10 UK healthcare organizations. This design was most appropriate given the voluntary nature of Rounds and ensured the study had ecological validity. Self-reported data were collected from attenders and non-attenders at baseline and at eight-months follow-up. The outcomes were psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection. Results During the 8 months’ study duration, regular attenders (N = 51) attended Rounds on average 4 times (2–8). Attenders showed a significantly greater decrease in psychological distress (as measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)) than non-attenders (N = 233; odds ratio of 0.197; 95% confidence interval (0.047–0.823)). However, Rounds attendance had no significant effect on work engagement, compassion and self-reflection. Conclusions Rounds attendance was linked to a 19% reduction in psychological distress adjusting for covariates. As an organization-wide intervention, Rounds thus constitute an effective, relatively low-cost intervention to assist staff in dealing with the demands of their work and to improve their well-being.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06413-4Schwartz roundsIntervention studyPsychological distressEngagement
spellingShingle Jeremy Dawson
Imelda McCarthy
Cath Taylor
Kristin Hildenbrand
Mary Leamy
Ellie Reynolds
Jill Maben
Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
BMC Health Services Research
Schwartz rounds
Intervention study
Psychological distress
Engagement
title Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
title_full Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
title_short Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
title_sort effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff a pre post quasi experimental evaluation
topic Schwartz rounds
Intervention study
Psychological distress
Engagement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06413-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremydawson effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT imeldamccarthy effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT cathtaylor effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT kristinhildenbrand effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT maryleamy effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT elliereynolds effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation
AT jillmaben effectivenessofagroupinterventiontoreducethepsychologicaldistressofhealthcarestaffaprepostquasiexperimentalevaluation