Images of the Future
This article analyzes the conceptions of anticipation and invention in the philosophies of Henri Bergson and Gilbert Simondon. In doing so, I analyze the questions how futures are anticipated and what role technologies play in the anticipation and invention of the future. Technologies are increasing...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Linköping University Electronic Press
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1689 |
| _version_ | 1818775239393280000 |
|---|---|
| author | Johannes Schick |
| author_facet | Johannes Schick |
| author_sort | Johannes Schick |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article analyzes the conceptions of anticipation and invention in the philosophies of Henri Bergson and Gilbert Simondon. In doing so, I analyze the questions how futures are anticipated and what role technologies play in the anticipation and invention of the future. Technologies are increasingly used to predict, prescribe and control behavior. These technologies are based upon the ontological belief that reality is computable and predictable. With Bergson and Simondon, I aim to show that this ontology does not take the temporal structure and the anticipatory faculty of living beings into account. Anticipation is an essential activity of a living being in its milieu. In order to survive, living beings structure their milieu to make their future actions reliable. Images are central to this process. They are constantly evoked by and with practices. They are transformed and used to anticipate and imagine the future. Yet, these images are affectively charged and can be an expression of what Bergson calls “myth-making function” (fonction fabulatrice). While Bergson describes this function as a positive force, one can ask whether this force turns against itself in face of our contemporary climate crisis, digital technologies and the crisis of open democracies. An alternative is to understand and to construct technical objects as essentially open in analogy to the living being. This implies a conception of the human not as a fixed conception, but as an “open adventure” (Simondon 2016: 121)that constantly re-invents itself in relation with nature and technology. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:53:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-aa3595f4c42f40728a41067eb2e2db4a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2000-1525 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:53:53Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Linköping University Electronic Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-aa3595f4c42f40728a41067eb2e2db4a2022-12-21T21:10:23ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252022-01-0113310.3384/cu.1689Images of the FutureJohannes Schick0University of CologneThis article analyzes the conceptions of anticipation and invention in the philosophies of Henri Bergson and Gilbert Simondon. In doing so, I analyze the questions how futures are anticipated and what role technologies play in the anticipation and invention of the future. Technologies are increasingly used to predict, prescribe and control behavior. These technologies are based upon the ontological belief that reality is computable and predictable. With Bergson and Simondon, I aim to show that this ontology does not take the temporal structure and the anticipatory faculty of living beings into account. Anticipation is an essential activity of a living being in its milieu. In order to survive, living beings structure their milieu to make their future actions reliable. Images are central to this process. They are constantly evoked by and with practices. They are transformed and used to anticipate and imagine the future. Yet, these images are affectively charged and can be an expression of what Bergson calls “myth-making function” (fonction fabulatrice). While Bergson describes this function as a positive force, one can ask whether this force turns against itself in face of our contemporary climate crisis, digital technologies and the crisis of open democracies. An alternative is to understand and to construct technical objects as essentially open in analogy to the living being. This implies a conception of the human not as a fixed conception, but as an “open adventure” (Simondon 2016: 121)that constantly re-invents itself in relation with nature and technology.https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1689Philosophy of TimePhilosophy of TechnologyPhilosophy of LifeHenri BergsonGilbert SimondonFrench Epistemology |
| spellingShingle | Johannes Schick Images of the Future Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research Philosophy of Time Philosophy of Technology Philosophy of Life Henri Bergson Gilbert Simondon French Epistemology |
| title | Images of the Future |
| title_full | Images of the Future |
| title_fullStr | Images of the Future |
| title_full_unstemmed | Images of the Future |
| title_short | Images of the Future |
| title_sort | images of the future |
| topic | Philosophy of Time Philosophy of Technology Philosophy of Life Henri Bergson Gilbert Simondon French Epistemology |
| url | https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1689 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johannesschick imagesofthefuture |